SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

InvestigationofEthnopedagogicalFactorsinTeacherEducation: KyrgyzstanSample

Kıymet SELVİ
Yaprak ALAGÖZ HAMZAJ
Pages
319–338
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They also indicated furtherinsightandconcreteproposals.Asacountrywithadeepand rich history, it would be a great chance for Turkey to benefit from this educationalexperience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Thepurposeofthisstudyistoinvestigatetheethnopedagogyeducationin the teacher education programs in Kyrgyzstan.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Basic qualitative research methodwasappliedinthestudy.Thedatawerecollectedthroughdocument reviewand interviewswithgraduate students from Kyrgyz-TurkishManas Universityandinstructors.TheresearcherstayedinBishkek,Kyrgyzstanfor 50 days to collect the data, the documents and to plan and conduct the interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They also indicated furtherinsightandconcreteproposals.Asacountrywithadeepand rich history, it would be a great chance for Turkey to benefit from this educationalexperience.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Thepurposeofthisstudyistoinvestigatetheethnopedagogyeducationin the teacher education programs in Kyrgyzstan. Basic qualitative research methodwasappliedinthestudy.Thedatawerecollectedthroughdocument reviewand interviewswithgraduate students from Kyrgyz-TurkishManas Universityandinstructors.TheresearcherstayedinBishkek,Kyrgyzstanfor 50 days to collect the data, the documents and to plan and conduct the interviews. The data collected via document review and interviews, were analyzedbycontentanalysismethod.Asaresultoftheanalysis,information abouttheethnopedagogyclassatKyrgyz-TurkishManasUniversityteacher education program was reviewed and the instructors’ opinions about ethnopedagogyeducationatteachereducationprogramsandthegraduate students’opinionsabouttheethnopedagogyclasswereidentified.Themost important result can be seen as that instructors and students give great importance to ethnopedagogy and adopt its ideas. They also indicated furtherinsightandconcreteproposals.Asacountrywithadeepand rich history, it would be a great chance for Turkey to benefit from this educationalexperience.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, K., HAMZAJ, Y. A. (2022). InvestigationofEthnopedagogicalFactorsinTeacherEducation: KyrgyzstanSample. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 319–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/644649

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Afanasyev, V. (1966). The development of school and pedagogical thinking in Yakutia. Republic of Sakha: Sakha book publishing. Alimbekov, A. (2007). Etnopedagojı ̇ve Kırgız etnopedagojisinin temel kavramları. Türk Yurdu, 27(242), 31-36.
  2. Alimbekov, A. (2012). Kyrgyz ethnopedagogy: student book for higher and secondary educational institutions providing pedagogical education. Bishkek. Alimbekov, A. (2015). Kırgızistan'da öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının etnopedagojik yönden gelişimi. Uluslararası 3. Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi.
  3. Anwar-Hafid, Amiruddin, Suardika, K. Sartono, & Peribadi (2015). An analysis of kalosara function as ethnopedagogic media in nation character-building in south east Sulawesi. International Research Journal of Emerging Trends in Multidisciplinary, 1(9), 1-15.
  4. Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi. (2006). Söylev ve demeçler. Ankara:
  5. ATAM. Gashimov, A. S. & Sadigov, F. B. (1970). Azerbaijani folk pedagogy. Baku: Azer Nashr. Indiati, I., Rosilawati, A., Sarwi, Hartono, & Prayito, M. (2020). Ethnopedagogy Oriented Learning Model. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019), 443, 79-82. Doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200620.015 Khanbikov, J. I (1967). Educational thought history of Tatar people. Kazan: Tatar Book Publishing. Kuzmin, V. K., Krylov, D. A., Komelin, & V. A., Kuzmin, N. V. (2014). Ethnopedagogical competence of teachers: criteria, indicators and level of development. Modern problems of science and education, (5). Latyshina, D. N., & Khayrullin, P. Z. (2014). Etnopedagogika. Moskova: Yurayt Publishing House. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Shavadi, A. (2015). New information technologies in ethnopedagogical process. In Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), 9th International Conference, IEEE, (pp. 595- 599). Doi: 10.1109/ICAICT.2015.7338630 Volkov, G. N. (1974).
  6. Etnopedagıgıka. Çeboksarı. Volkov, G. N. (1958). Chuvash folk pedagogy. Cheboksary: Chuvashgosizdat. Zaydullina, N. N. (2015). Role of labour education in the ethnopedagogics in the modern World. Young Scientist USA, 4, 29-31.