SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22

Eğitim Hakkı ve Uzaktan Öğretim

Right of Education and Distance Learning

Kıymet SELVİ
Pages
201–211
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, inflexibility of programs, the high costs of technological infrastructure, the lack of financial support for economical disadvantageous individuals is the main disadvantages of right of education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, distance learning programs and their applications which are carried out by Anadolu University were analyzed within the context of the right of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Qualitative research method was applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, inflexibility of programs, the high costs of technological infrastructure, the lack of financial support for economical disadvantageous individuals is the main disadvantages of right of education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, distance learning programs and their applications which are carried out by Anadolu University were analyzed within the context of the right of education. Qualitative research method was applied. In the first part of study, the concept of right of education was analyzed within the context of international and national laws. Additionally, basic aims, applications and features of the distance learning were examined. In the second part of the study features of the distance learning programs were analyzed in this context. The study showed that distance learning programs which are carried out by Anadolu University provides a number of individuals who lives in different parts of the country and who are at various ages and have different qualifications with the opportunity to use the right of education. However, inflexibility of programs, the high costs of technological infrastructure, the lack of financial support for economical disadvantageous individuals is the main disadvantages of right of education.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Anadolu Üniversitesi tarafından yürütülen uzaktan öğretim programları ve bunlara ilişkin uygulamalar, eğitim hakkı kavramı bağla- mında analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünde uluslararası sözleşmeler ve ulusal yasalar açısından eğitim hakkı kavramı analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca, uzaktan öğretimin temel amacı, uygulamaları ve özellikleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın ikinci bölümünde uzaktan öğretim programları eğitim hakkı kavramı bağlamında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, Anadolu Üniversitesi tarafından yürütülen uzaktan eğitim programlarının, farklı bölgelerde yaşayan, her yaştan ve farklı nitelikteki çok sayıdaki bireye eğitim hakkını kullanma olanağı sağladığı saptanmıştır. Ancak, programların yapısının esnek olma- ması, teknolojik altyapının çok pahalı olması, gelir düzeyi düşük bireylerin sisteme girişinin desteklenmemesi eğitim hakkı açısından önemli olum- suzluklardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, K. (2022). Eğitim Hakkı ve Uzaktan Öğretim. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22, 201–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/507731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. AOF öğrenci istatistikleri. (2004). Anadolu Üniversitesi AOF istatistik birimi dökümanları. Eskişekir.Unpublished raw data. Balcı, M. (1998). Eğitim ve öğretimde haklar ve yükümlülükler. İstanbul: Umut Kağıtçılık- Matbaacılık San.Tic. ltd.Sti. Benedek, W. & M. Nikolova. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding human rights: Manual on human rights education. Human security network, Graz: Austria. (online) Retrieved on18-March-2004, at URL: http://www.etc-graz.at/human-security/manual/
  2. Charles, C. M. & C. A. Mertler. (2002). Introduction to educational research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Chander, N. J. (1991). Management of distance education. New Delhi: Sterling. Gülmez, M. (2000). Eğitim ve insan hakları eğitimi hakkı. In Gökçen Alpakay (Ed.), Insan hakları (309-336). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  3. Hatiboğlu, T. (1995). Yüksek öğretim mevzuatı. Istanbul: Selvi Yayınları.
  4. Hitchcock, G. & D. Hughes. (1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school- based research. London: Routledge. http://www.aof.anadolu.edu.tr/a0521.htm. Retrieved February 06, 2005. http://ogrsayi.anadolu.edu.tr/ozet.htm. Retrieved August 09, 2004.
  5. Marland, P. (1997). Towards more effective open & distance teaching. London: Kogan Page. McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the customer. Boston: Parson A&B. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded form case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  6. Mills, R. (1999). Diversity, convergence and the evolution of student support in higher education in the UK. In A. Tait and R. Mills (Eds.), The Convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for individual learners (pp.71-85). London: Routledge Moore, M. & G. Kearsley. (1996). Distance education. London: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Nowak M. (1997).
  7. The right of education. In A. Eide, C. Krause and A. Rosas (Eds.), Economic social and cultural rights (pp.189-211). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  8. Peters, O. (2001). Learning & teaching in distance education. London: Kogan Page Limited. Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Shoemaker, C. C. J. (1998). Leadership in continuing and distance education in higher Education. London: Alley and Bacon. Smith, M. L. & G. V. Glass. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliff