SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

The effect of contact lens usage on corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconus patients

Keratokonus hastalarında kontakt lens kullanımının korneal biyomekanik parametreler üzerine etkisi

Dilek İLERİ
Pelin YILMAZBAŞ
Alpaslan ANAYOL
Ali Bülent ÇANKAYA
Faruk ÖZTÜRK
Pages
197–201
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences in mean CH between Group A and the other two groups were statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To determine and compare the corneal biomechanical properties in keratoconus patients using rigid gas permeable contact lenses and keratoconus patients who do not use contact lenses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The study consisted of 70 healthy controls (Group A), 27 ketatoconus subjects who do not use contact lens (Group B) and 36 rigid gas permeable contact lens using keratoconic patients (Group C).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences in mean CH between Group A and the other two groups were statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To determine and compare the corneal biomechanical properties in keratoconus patients using rigid gas permeable contact lenses and keratoconus patients who do not use contact lenses. Material and Method: The study consisted of 70 healthy controls (Group A), 27 ketatoconus subjects who do not use contact lens (Group B) and 36 rigid gas permeable contact lens using keratoconic patients (Group C). Corneal viscoelastic parameters were measured with an Ocular response analyzer (ORA). Central corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences in ORA parameters between the groups were compared. Results: The mean corneal hysteresis (CH) in Groups A, B, and C were 10.3±1.5 mm Hg, 7.8±1.4 mm Hg, and 7.4±1.2 mm Hg, respectively. The differences in mean CH between Group A and the other two groups were statistically significant (p

Özet

Amaç: Sert gaz geçirgen kontakt lens kullanan ve kullanmayan keratokonus olgularına ait korneal biyomekanik özelliklerin karşılaştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 70 sağlıklı olgu (Grup A) ile kontakt lens kullanmayan 27 keratokonus olgusu (Grup B) ve sert gaz geçirgen kontakt lens kullanmakta olan 36 keratokonus olgusu (Grup C) dahil edildi. Korneal viskoelastik parametreler Oküler respons analizörü (ORA) ile merkezi korneal kalınlık ultrasonik pakimetri ile ölçüldü. Elde edilen veriler gruplar arasında karşılaştırıldı.Sonuçlar: Grup A, B, C’den elde edilen ortalama korneal histerezis (KH) değerleri sırası ile 10,3±1,5 mm Hg, 7,8±1,4 mm Hg ve 7,4±1,2 mm Hg idi. Grup B ve C’ye ait KH değerleri Grup A’dan anlamlı ölçüde düşük bulundu ( her iki karşılaştırma için p

🔖

Cite This Article

İLERİ, D., YILMAZBAŞ, P., ANAYOL, A., ÇANKAYA, A. B., ÖZTÜRK, F. (2022). The effect of contact lens usage on corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconus patients. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 197–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/638259

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:146-55
  2. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3026-31
  3. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:673-9
  4. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:616-22
  5. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-62
  6. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:364-70
  7. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, Rama P, Campanelli P, Pye D. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32:11-9
  8. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:39-47
  9. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alio JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371–5
  10. Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, Gatinel D. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2912–6
  11. Hamilton K, Pye D, Hua S, Yu F, Chung J, Hou Q. The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1636–8
  12. Oh JH, Yoo C, Kim YY, Kim HM, Song JS. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:371-5
  13. Chen D, Lam AKC, Cho P. A pilot study on the corneal biomechanical changes in short-term orthokeratology. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2009;29:464-71
  14. Kotecha A. What Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Are Relevant for the Clinician? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:109-14.