SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2

The Moderating Role of Workplace Ostracism on the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Counterproductive Work Behavior

İstismarcı Yönetimin Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde İşyerinde Dışlanmanın Düzenleyici Rolü

Erkan TAŞKIRAN
Nihal KARTALTEPE BEHRAM
Esra DİNÇ ELMALI
Gülşah GENÇER ÇELİK
Pages
782–802
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research; abusive supervision has a positive and significant effect on counterproductive work behavior and it has been concluded that workplace ostracism plays a moderator role on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the moderator role of workplace ostracism on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data in the study were collected through a survey technique from 274 people working in businesses operating in the fields of banking, tourism and health in Istanbul.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research; abusive supervision has a positive and significant effect on counterproductive work behavior and it has been concluded that workplace ostracism plays a moderator role on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderator role of workplace ostracism on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior. The data in the study were collected through a survey technique from 274 people working in businesses operating in the fields of banking, tourism and health in Istanbul. Correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used to test the research hypotheses. As a result of the research; abusive supervision has a positive and significant effect on counterproductive work behavior and it has been concluded that workplace ostracism plays a moderator role on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işyerinde dışlanmanın düzenleyici (moderatör) rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmada veriler İstanbul’da bankacılık, turizm ve sağlık alanında faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde çalışan 274 kişiden anket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerinin test edilmesinde, korelasyon analizi ve hiyerarşik regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu görülürken, istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işyerinde dışlanmanın düzenleyici rol oynadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞKIRAN, E., BEHRAM, N. K., ELMALI, E. D., ÇELİK, G. G. (2022). The Moderating Role of Workplace Ostracism on the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Counterproductive Work Behavior. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2, 782–802. https://ajindex.com/articles/633270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akram, Z., Li, Y., & Akram, U. (2019). When employees are emotionally exhausted due to abusive supervision: a conversation of resources perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1-17.
  2. An, F. & Wang, B. (2016). Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behavior: moderating effect of negative affectivity. Journal of Service Science and Management, 9, 66-73.
  3. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
  4. Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
  5. Bamberger, P. A. & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account, Human Relations, 59(6), 723- 752. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  6. Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269-309.
  7. Brees, J., Mackey, J., Martinko, M., & Harvey, P. (2014). The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 403-413.
  8. Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018).
  10. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, Ankara:
  11. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Cacciatore, G. (2015). Petty tranny as a form of destructive leadership: Results of studies based on a french-canadian measure, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Quebec: University of Quebec. Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrewé, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937-961.
  12. Chen, Z. X., & Wang, H. Y. (2017). Abusive supervision and employees' job performance: A multiple mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(5), 845-858.
  13. Cropanzano, R