Journals / NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-CARE AGENCY AND SUCCESSFUL AGING IN INDIVIDUALS AGED 65 OR OVER

Pages
67–77
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An information form, the Self-Care Agency Scale, and the Successful Aging Scale (SAS) were employed in data collection. p values

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the association between self-care agency and successful aging in individuals aged 65 or over.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was performed with elderly individuals (n:125) presenting to a training and research hospital between July and October 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An information form, the Self-Care Agency Scale, and the Successful Aging Scale (SAS) were employed in data collection. p values
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yaşlılık · Başarılı Yaşlanma · Öz Bakım

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between self-care agency and successful aging in individuals aged 65 or over. The research was performed with elderly individuals (n:125) presenting to a training and research hospital between July and October 2012. An information form, the Self-Care Agency Scale, and the Successful Aging Scale (SAS) were employed in data collection. p values

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 65 yaş ve üstü bireylerde öz bakım gücü ile başarılı yaşlanma arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Araştırma, Temmuz - Ekim 2021 tarihleri arasında, bir eğitim araştırma hastanesine başvuran yaşlılarda (n: 125) yürütüldü. Veri toplamada, bilgi formu, öz bakım gücü ölçeği ve başarılı yaşlanma ölçeği kullanıldı. İstatistiksel anlamlılık seviyesi p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, A., SAYILAN, A. A. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-CARE AGENCY AND SUCCESSFUL AGING IN INDIVIDUALS AGED 65 OR OVER. NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER DERGİSİ, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 67–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/584492

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abdi, S., Spann, A., Borilovic, J., de Witte, L., Hawley, M. (2019). Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC Geriatr, 19 (1), 195. Altay, B., Aydın Avcı, İ. (2009). Huzurevinde yaşayan yaşlılarda özbakım gücü ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişki. Dicle Tıp Derg/Dicle Med J, 36(4), 275-282.
  2. Amegbor, P.M., Kuuire, V.Z., Robertson, H., Kuffuor, O.A. (2018). Predictors of basic self-care and intermediate self-care functional disabilities among older adults in Ghana. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 77, 81-88. Apóstolo, J., Bobrowicz-Campos, E., Gil, I., Silva, R., Costa, P., Couto, F., Cardoso, D., Barata, A., Almeida, M. (2019). Cognitive Stimulation in Older Adults: An Innovative Good Practice Supporting Successful Aging and Self-Care. Transl Med UniSa, 19, 90-94.
  3. Blanco-Molina, M., Pinazo-Hernandis, S., Montoro-Rodriguez, J., Tomas, J.M. (2021). Testing a Proactive Model of Successful Aging Among Older Adults in Costa Rica and Spain. Int J Aging Hum Dev, 93 (1), 619-635.
  4. Curcio CL, Pineda A, Quintero P, Rojas Á, Muñoz S, Gómez F. Successful Aging in Colombia: The Role of Disease. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Oct 30;4:2333721418804052. doi: 10.1177/2333721418804052. Çunkuş, N., Taşdemir Yiğitoğlu, G., Akbaş, E. (2019). Yaşlılık ve Toplumsal Dışlanma. Geriatrik Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 58-67. Dziechciaż, M., Filip, R. (2014). Biological psychological and social determinants of old age: bio-psycho-social aspects of human aging. Ann Agric Environ Med, 21 (4), 835-8.
  5. Erci, B., Yılmaz, D., Budak, F. (2017). Yaşlı Bireylerde Özbakım Gücü ve Yaşam Doyumunun Umut Düzeylerine Etkisi. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi - Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 8 (2), 72–76.
  6. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R. (1975) J Psychiatr Res, 12 (3), 189-98.
  7. Freedman, V.A., Spillman, B.C. (2014). Disability and care needs among older Americans. The Milbank Quarterly, 92 (3), 509–541.
  8. Güngen, C., Ertan, T., Eker, E., Yaşar, R., ENgin, F. (2002). Standardize Mini Mental Test’in Türk toplumunda hafif demans tanısında geçerlik ve güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13, 273-81. Gutiérrez, M., Tomás, J.M., Calatayud, P. (2018). Contributions of Psychosocial Factors and Physical Activity to Successful Aging. Span J Psychol, 21, E26. Hazer, O., Özsungur, F. (2017). Başarılı Yaşlanma Ölçeği (SAS) Türkçe Versiyonu, International Journal of Education