SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İHYA Uluslararası İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

ELEAZAR B. YOSE HA-GALILI AND THIRTY TWO HERMENEUTIC RULES

ELEAZAR B. YOSE HA-GALİLİ VE OTUZ İKİ YORUM KURALI

Ömer Faruk ARAZ
Pages
98–118
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to the interpretation rules of Hillel and Yishmael, 32 interpretation rules of Yose ha-Galili were also used for the interpretation of narrative texts except for the purpose of making judgments from religious texts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The plural form of the word Midda is middot and is the name given to the rules of interpretation created for the interpretation of sacred texts in Judaism and for legal inferences from these texts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These rules appear as a list of 7 rules of interpretation that were first attributed to Rabbi Hillel.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to the interpretation rules of Hillel and Yishmael, 32 interpretation rules of Yose ha-Galili were also used for the interpretation of narrative texts except for the purpose of making judgments from religious texts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The plural form of the word Midda is middot and is the name given to the rules of interpretation created for the interpretation of sacred texts in Judaism and for legal inferences from these texts. These rules appear as a list of 7 rules of interpretation that were first attributed to Rabbi Hillel. Then, the 13 interpretation rules attributed to Rabbi Yishmael, who lived in the 1-2. centuries AD are the extended and improved form of Hillel's rules. The subject of our study is Rabbi Eliezer b. Yose ha-Galili's 32 interpretation rules constitute the third step of this process. In addition to the interpretation rules of Hillel and Yishmael, 32 interpretation rules of Yose ha-Galili were also used for the interpretation of narrative texts except for the purpose of making judgments from religious texts.

Özet

Midda kelimesinin çoğulu middot olup, Yahudilikte kutsal metinlerin yorumlanması, bu metinlerden hukuki çıkarımlarda bulunulması için oluşturulmuş yorum kurallarına verilen isimdir. Bu kurallar bir liste halinde ilk olarak Rabbi Hillel’e izafe edilen 7 yorum kuralı olarak karşımıza çıkar. Daha sonra miladi 1-2. Asırlarda yaşamış olan Rabbi Yişmael’e izafe edilen 13 yorum kuralı Hillel’in kurallarının genişletilmiş ve geliştirilmiş biçimidir. Çalışmamızın konusu olan Rabbi Eliezer b. Yose ha-Galili’nin 32 yorum kuralı ise bu sürecin üçüncü adımını oluşturmaktadır. Ayrıca Hillel ve Yişmael’in yorum kurallarından farklı olarak Yose ha-Galili’nin 32 yorum kuralı dini metinlerden hüküm çıkarma gayesi dışında rivayet özellikli metinlerin yorumu için de kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAZ, Ö. F. (2022). ELEAZAR B. YOSE HA-GALILI AND THIRTY TWO HERMENEUTIC RULES. İHYA Uluslararası İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 98–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/544246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. ARAZ, Ömer Faruk. “Rabbâni Gelenekte Rabbi Yişmael’in Tevrat Tefsiri İçin Oluşturduğu On üç Yorum Kuralı”. Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 51/Aralık (2016): 115-134.
  2. ARAZ, Ömer Faruk. “Rabbani Yahudiliğin İlk Yorum Prensipleri: Hillel’in Yedi Yorum Kuralı”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 5/2 (06 Nisan 2016): 321-337. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.00110.
  3. ARAZ, Ömer Faruk. Yahudilikte Tefsir Geleneği. 1. Bs. İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2019. Babil Talmudu. t.y. https://www.sefaria.org/texts/Talmud.
  4. BEN DAVİD, Hillel. “Rules of Jewish Hermeneutics”. Erişim: 04 Haziran 2019. http://www.betemunah.org/rules.html.
  5. CINON, Rabbi Samson of. Sefer Keritot. Varşova: -, 1854. DAN, Joseph. “Is Midrash Exegesis”. Study and Knowledge in Jewish Thought. 81-99. Ber Sheva: Ben Gurion University of Negev Press, 2006.
  6. EISENBERG, Ronald L. Essential Figures in the Talmud. New York and UK: Jason Arason Publication, 2013.
  7. ENELOW, Hyman Gerson. Mişnat Rabbi Eliezer o Midraş Şeloşim u Ştayim Middot. New York, 1933.
  8. ENELOW, Hyman Gerson. “The Midrash of Thirty-Two Rules of Interpretation”. The Jewish Quarterly Review 23/4 (Nisan 1933): 357-367.
  9. EPSTEIN, Isidore. “Foreword”. Midrash Rabbah. I. London: The Soncino Press, 1939.
  10. FREEDMAN, Harry - Wald, Stephen G. “Akiva”. Encyclopaedia Judaica. I: 562. USA: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006.
  11. FRIEDMAN, H. - Simon, Maurice, ed. Midrash Rabbah. London: The Soncino Press, 1939.
  12. GINZBERG, Louis. “Akiba ben Joseph”. The Jewish Encyclopaedia. I: 304-306. New York and London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1901.
  13. GINZBERG, Louis. “Baraita of the Thirty-Two Rules”. The Jewish Encyclopaedia. II: 520-521. New York and London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1901.
  14. HANDELMAN, Susan A. The Slayers of Moses, The Emergence of Rabbinic Interpretation in Modern Literary Theory. New York: The State Univ. of New York Press, 1982.
  15. HARRIS, Jay M. How Do We Know This? Midrash and the Fragmentation of Modern Judaism. USA: The State Univ. of New York Press, 1995. “Hermeneutics”. The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion. 318. New York: The Oxford University Press, 1997.
  16. HILEWITZ, Alter. “Eliezer ben Yose ha-Gelili”. VI: 329-330. USA: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006. Kitab-ı Mukaddes. İstanbul: Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi, 1997.
  17. KRAEMER, David. “Tannaim”. Encyclopaedia of Religion. XIII: 898. USA: Macmillan Reference USA, 2005.
  18. LAUTERBACH, Jacob Z. “Rules of Eliezer b. Jose ha-Gelili, Thirty-Two”. The Jewish Encyclopaedia. X: 510-511. Funk and Wa