SavedAdd your journal

Journals / History Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 5

The Naval Battle of Artemision: A New Assessment

Artemision Deniz Savaşı: Yeni Bir Değerlendirme

Alifer ÇİFTCİ
Pages
2371–2394
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aim to reveal the objectives and phases of the Battle of Artemision, indetail and more obviously, within the frame of the points of view which were asserted by theresearchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the struggle between the Persians and the Greek cities continued for more than twocenturies, in this period the most important battles happened in the years of 490 and 480 or 479BC when the Persians tried to obtain the Greek mainland.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Obviously, the Persian kings Darius I(522-486 BC) and Xerxes (486-465 BC) wanted to expand the borders of their empire by takingGreece under their rule.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aim to reveal the objectives and phases of the Battle of Artemision, indetail and more obviously, within the frame of the points of view which were asserted by theresearchers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although the struggle between the Persians and the Greek cities continued for more than twocenturies, in this period the most important battles happened in the years of 490 and 480 or 479BC when the Persians tried to obtain the Greek mainland. Obviously, the Persian kings Darius I(522-486 BC) and Xerxes (486-465 BC) wanted to expand the borders of their empire by takingGreece under their rule. Accordingly, the strategic and tactical problems of the Persian attackswere analyzed by the researchers at all points and they have continued to be studied in the presentday. The narration of Herodotus regarding the Naval Battle of Artemision is an example for theaforesaid problems. We aim to reveal the objectives and phases of the Battle of Artemision, indetail and more obviously, within the frame of the points of view which were asserted by theresearchers.

Özet

Persler ile Yunan kentleri arasındaki mücadele iki yüz yıldan daha uzun bir süre devam etmiş olsa da bu süreçte en önemli savaşlar Perslerin Yunan anakarasını MÖ 490 ve 480/479’da ele geçirmeye çalıştığı sırada yaşanmıştır. Açıkçası Pers Kralları Dareios I (MÖ 522-486) ve Kserkses (MÖ 486-465), Yunanistan’ı hâkimiyet altına alıp imparatorluk sınırlarını genişletmek istemiştir. Bu doğrultuda Pers saldırılarının stratejik ve taktiksel problemleri, her yönüyle araştırmacılar tarafından tetkik edilmiş olup günümüzde de incelenmeye devam edilmektedir. Bu tür problemlere bir örnek, Herodotos’un Artemison Savaşı’na dair anlatımıdır. Amacımız antik kaynaklar ile araştırmacıların öne sürdüğü görüşler çerçevesinde Artemision Savaşı’nın amacı ve safhalarını ayrıntılı ve daha açık bir şekilde ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTCİ, A. (2022). The Naval Battle of Artemision: A New Assessment. History Studies, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 5, 2371–2394. https://ajindex.com/articles/536648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aristophanes, Lysistrata, Thesmophoriazusae, Ecclesiazusae, Plutus, vol. III, Translation, B. B. Rogers, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 1946.
  2. Aristoteles, Athenaion Politeia (Atinalıların Devleti), çev., A. Çokona, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2019.
  3. Cornelius Nepos, On the Great Generals of Foreign Nations (Ünlü Kişilerin Yaşamları), çev., Ü. Fafo Telatar, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul 2016.
  4. Demosthenes, Orations I-XVII, XX: Olynthiacs; Philippics; Halonnesus; Minor Public Orations; Speech Against Leptines, vol. I, Trans., J. H. Vince, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 2004.
  5. Diodoros, Bibliotheke Historike: Diodorous of Sicily, Trans., C. H. Oldfather, vol. I-VI; C. H. Sherman, vol. VII; C. B. Welles, vol. VIII; R. M. Geer, vol. IX-X; F. R. Walton, vol. XI-XII, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 1933-2004.
  6. Dio Khrysostomos, Orationes: Dio Chrysostom, Trans., J. W. Cohoon- H. L. Crosby, London, New York 1932-1953;
  7. Cambridge, Mass-London 2006.
  8. Herodotos, Historiae (Herodot Tarihi), çev., M. Ökmen, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2016.
  9. Isokrates, Isocrates, Trans., G. Norlin, vol. I-II, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.- London 1980.
  10. Lysias, Lysias, Trans., W. R. M. Lamb, Cambridge-Massachusetts 2000.
  11. Marcus Iulianus Iustinus, M. Iuliani Iustini Epitoma Historiarum Phillippicarum Pompei Trogi, Epitome of the Phillippic History of Pompeius Trogus, Translation by J. C. Yardley, With Introduction and explanatory notes by R. Develin, Atlanta 1994.
  12. Pausanias, Periegesis tes Hellados: Description of Greece, Trans., W. H. Jones-H. A. Ormerod, Vol. I-VI, New York 1918.
  13. Plinius Secundus, Naturalis Historia, Natural History, Trans., J. H. R. Rackham, W. H. S. Jones, D. E. Eichholz, Vol. I-X, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 1938- 1971.
  14. Plutarkhos, Bioi Paralelloi: Themistokles, Trans., B. Perrin, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 1914.
  15. Cambridge, Bioi Paralelloi:Aristides, Trans., B. Perrin, The Loeb Classical Library,Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1914.
  16. Cambridge, Bioi Paralelloi: Kimon, Trans., B. Perrin, The Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1914.
  17. Cambridge, Plutarch’s Moralia, Trans., F. C. Babbith- W. C. Helmbold, vols. I-XIV, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.-London 1928-1967.
  18. Polyainos, Stratagemata: Stratagems of War, Trans., P. Kerentz and E. L. Wheeler. Vol. I- II. Ares Publishers, Chicago 1994. Strabo