SavedAdd your journal

Journals / History Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

ATHANASIUS’ POLEMICAL USE OF GENDER AND THE WORD“EUNUCH” TO COMBAT EARLY ARIANISM

Athanasius’un Erken Aryanizm ile Mücadelede Cinsiyeti ve “Hadım” Sözcüğünü Polemik Amaçlı Kullanımı

Paul BRAZINSKI
Pages
371–378
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the process, this paperalso fills a lacuna in the history of eunuchsduring Late Antiquity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Several scholars have researched the change andcontinuity of the late antiquity world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During thisperiod, heretical religious groups, such as theArians, were threats to the identity ofmainstream Christianity since both groups calledthemselves Christians.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the process, this paperalso fills a lacuna in the history of eunuchsduring Late Antiquity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Several scholars have researched the change andcontinuity of the late antiquity world. During thisperiod, heretical religious groups, such as theArians, were threats to the identity ofmainstream Christianity since both groups calledthemselves Christians. Indeed, scholarship hasshown how closely contested these two groupswere in hindsight in the development of“mainstream” Christianity. This paper looks atthe early Christian use of gender, namely fromAthanasius, to differentiate Arian practices andtheology from his mainstream viewpoint. Itargues why eunuchs were welcomed to Arianismand how Athanasius, the bishop of Alexandria,countered his opponents’ advances to protectChristianity’s identity. In the process, this paperalso fills a lacuna in the history of eunuchsduring Late Antiquity.

Özet

Birçok araştırmacı geç antik dönemin değişimini vedevamlılığını araştırmaktadır. Bu dönemde, Aryanlargibi heretik dini gruplar kendilerini Hristiyan olarakadlandırdıklarından Hristiyanlık anlayışına tehditoluşturmuşlardır. Aslına bakılırsa, ilim dünyasıbirbirine muhalif bu iki grubun Hristiyanlıkanlayışının gelişimindeki rolünü anlamakta geçkalmıştır. Bu çalışmada Aryanların adetleri veteolojisini Athanasius’un temel görüşünden ayırtetmek için erken dönem Hristiyan cinsiyet kullanımıincelenmektedir. Yine bu çalışma Aryanizm’dehadımların niçin hoş karşılandıklarını ve İskenderiyepiskoposu Athanasius’un Hristiyanlık kimliğinikorumak için rakipleriyle nasıl mücadele ettiğini elealınmaktadır. Ayrıca geç antik dönemdeki hadımlarıntarihinde yer alan boşluğu doldurmayıamaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BRAZINSKI, P. (2022). ATHANASIUS’ POLEMICAL USE OF GENDER AND THE WORD“EUNUCH” TO COMBAT EARLY ARIANISM. History Studies, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 371–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/536550

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Athanasius, The Life of Antony: And the Letter to Marcellinus. Edited by William A. Clebsch and Robert C. Gregg. Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1980.
  2. BARNES, Michel R., and Daniel H. Williams, eds. Arianism after Arius. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1993.
  3. BAUER, Walter. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. London: SCM Press, 1972.
  4. BERNDT, Guido M., and Roland Steinacher, eds. Arianism: Roman Heresy and Barbarian Creed. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
  5. BROWN, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. Twentieth-anniversary ed. with a new introduction. ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
  6. BROWN, Peter. The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, A.D. 200-1000. 10th ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
  7. BURRUS, Virginia. The Sex Lives of Saints: An Erotics of Ancient Hagiography. Kindle Edition. ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.
  8. EHRMAN, Bart D. Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  9. EL-AZHARI, Taef Kamal. Queens, Eunuchs and Concubines in Islamic History, 661-1257. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.
  10. GREGORY, Timothy E. A History of Byzantium. 2nd ed. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
  11. JAMES, Liz, ed. Women, Men, and Eunuchs: Gender in Byzantium. London: Routledge, 2006.
  12. KUEFLER, Mathew. The Manly Eunuch: Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
  13. MACHAFFIE, Barbara J. Her Story: Women in Christian Tradition. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006.
  14. MAYER, Wendy, and Pauline Allen. John Chrysostom. London: Routledge, 2011.
  15. RINGROSE, Kathryn. "Living in the Shadows; Eunuchs and Gender in Byantine." In Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, edited by Gilbert H. Herdt, 85-111. New York: Zone Books, 2003.
  16. RINGROSE, Kathryn M. The Perfect Servant: Eunuchs and the Social Construction of Gender in Byzantium. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
  17. SCHAFF, Philip, and Henry Wace, eds. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994.
  18. SCHOLTZ, Piotr O. Eunuchs and Castrati: The Emasculation of Eros. Princeton, N.J.: Markus Weiner, 1999.
  19. STEVENSON, Walter. "The Rise of Eunuchs in Greco-Roman Antiquity." Journal of the History of Sexuality 5, no. 4 (1995): 495-511.
  20. TOUGHER, Shaun. The Eunuch in Byzantine Hi