Journals / Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Turkish Draft Law on Mediation of Civil Disputes: A comparative study of the regulations in Turkey and the united kingdom

Hukuk uyuşmazlıklarında arabuluculuk kanunu tasarısı: İngiltere'deki düzenlemeler ile karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme

Pages
55–66
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Part II examines the regulation for professional activities of mediators and the differences between states regarding the conditions for acceptance into profession.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the National Programmes of 2003 and 2008, Turkey claimed its willingness for harmonization with EU acquits in the field of alternative dispute resolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this regard, Turkish Draft Law on Mediation of Civil Disputes was completed in 2008 and as of today it has been waiting before Turkish Parliament for enactment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Part II examines the regulation for professional activities of mediators and the differences between states regarding the conditions for acceptance into profession.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the National Programmes of 2003 and 2008, Turkey claimed its willingness for harmonization with EU acquits in the field of alternative dispute resolution. In this regard, Turkish Draft Law on Mediation of Civil Disputes was completed in 2008 and as of today it has been waiting before Turkish Parliament for enactment. In brief, Draft Law regulates mediation process in the resolution of civil disputes and meditation profession. The Article aims to examine Draft Law and parallel regulations in United Kingdom, in a comparative way. Part I focuses on mediation process and asserts that there are differences between these two states concerning the methods and the scope of regulations, their effects on the promotion of mediation and factors affecting these processes. Part II examines the regulation for professional activities of mediators and the differences between states regarding the conditions for acceptance into profession.

Özet

2003 ve 2008 yılı Ulusal Programlarında, alternatif uyuşmazlık çözümü alanındaki Avrupa Birliği mevzuatı ile uyumlulaştırma hedefine yer verilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, 2008 yılında hazırlanan Hukuk Uyuşmazlıklarında Arabuluculuk Kanunu Tasarısı, günümüz itibari ile yasalaşmayı beklemektedir. Özetle, Kanun Tasarısı, özel hukuk uyuşmazlıklarının çözümünde arabuluculuk yönteminin kullanımını ve arabuluculuk mesleğine ilişkin düzenlemeleri içermektedir. Çalışmada, Kanun Tasarısının İngilteredeki benzeri düzenlemeler ile karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. İlk kısımda, arabuluculuk süreci üzerinde durulmakta ve her iki ülke arasındaki düzenlemelerin, düzenleme yöntemi ve kapsamı, arabuluculuk kullanımının teşvikine etkisi ve düzenlemelere etki eden etmenler açısından farklılıklar içerdiği iddiasında bulunulmaktadır. İkinci bölümde ise, arabulucuların mesleki faaliyetine ilişkin düzenlemeler incelenmekte ve her iki ülke arasında mesleğe kabul şartları arasında yer alan farklılıklar üzerinde durulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, S. S. (2022). Turkish Draft Law on Mediation of Civil Disputes: A comparative study of the regulations in Turkey and the united kingdom. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 55–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/528885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ANTAKİ, Nabil N.,“Cultural Diversity and ADR Practices in the World”, ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, Goldsmith, Jean-Claude/ Pointon, Gerald (eds.), Kluwer Law International, 2006, (s.265-302).
  2. BOK, Derek, “A Flawed System of Law Practice and Training”, Journal of Legal Eduaction, Yıl:1983, Sayı:4, (s. 570-585).
  3. BOULLE, Laurence /NESIC, Miryana, Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice, Butterworths, London, 2001.
  4. BROWN, Henry /MARRIOTT, Arthur, ADR Principles and Practice, Sweet&Maxwell, London, 1999.
  5. CLARKE, Anthony, The Woolf Reforms: “A Singular Event or an Ongoing Process”, The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On, Dwyer, Deirdre (ed.), Oxford University Press, 2009, (s. 33-52).
  6. DEMİR, Şamil, “Yeni Bir Meslek Arabuluculuk”, Terazi Hukuk Dergisi, Yıl: 2008, Cilt: 21, (s. 137-145).
  7. GENN, Hazel., Judging Civil Justice, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008.
  8. GREENE, David, The New Civil Procedure Rules, Butterworths, London, 1999.
  9. FREEDMAN, Clive./ BARTLE, Philip.,“Franchising Disputes”, ADR and Commercial Disputes, Sweet-Maxwell, London, 2002.
  10. ILDIR, Gülgün.“Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözümü ve Hak Arama Özgürlüğü”, 75. Yaş Günü İçin Prof.Dr. Baki Kuru Armağanı, Pekcanıtez, Hakan (ed.) Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları, Ankara, 2004, (s. 385-403)
  11. LORD WOOLF, Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System of England and Wales (Final Report), HMSO, London. LORD WOOLF, Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales, HMSO, London, 1995.
  12. MELAMED, James, “Attorneys and Mediation: From Threat to Opportunity”, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Yıl: 1989, Sayı: 23,(s. 13-22).
  13. MNOOKIN, Robert, “Alternative Dispute Resolution”, Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. Paper 232, http://lsr.nellco.org/harvard_olin/232 (erişim tarihi: 20.12.2011).
  14. MISTELIS, Loukas A.,“ADR in England and Wales”, The American Review of International Arbitration,Yıl:2001, (s. 167-221).
  15. NOLAN-HALEY, Jacqueline, Evolving Paths to Justice: Assessing the EU Directive on Mediation, http:// ssrn.com/abstract=1942391 (erişim tarihi: 15.12.2011)
  16. ÖZBEK, Mustafa S., “ Avukatlık Kanunu’nun 35/A Maddesine Göre Arabuluculuk”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Yıl: 2001, Sayı: 3, (s. 113-139).
  17. ROBERTS, Marian.,“Family Mediation: The Develpment of the Regulatory Framework in the United Kingdom (Regulatory Framework)”, Conflict Resolu