SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Modernism To Postmodernism: Barbie

Modernleşmeden Postmodernleşmeye Barbie

Dilara Buket TATAR
Pages
167–192
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally Barbie’s these last changes will whether or not eliminate feminist critics about Barbie was evaluated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:D ue to her recognition widely shared by with other member of one’s society, Barbie can be called as an icon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides Barbie refers to a specific corporate attitude, a perceived ideal of the female form, a fashion queen of pop culture, and a phenomenon brand that has exploded throughout the world in the last fifty years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally Barbie’s these last changes will whether or not eliminate feminist critics about Barbie was evaluated
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Modern · postmodern · modernleşme

Abstract

D ue to her recognition widely shared by with other member of one’s society, Barbie can be called as an icon. Besides Barbie refers to a specific corporate attitude, a perceived ideal of the female form, a fashion queen of pop culture, and a phenomenon brand that has exploded throughout the world in the last fifty years. This paper reviews “modern” and “postmodern” referring to Barbie with all of these qualifications. Firstly Barbie’s revolution was examined in the context of Eurocentrism and cultural relativism. It has been later discussed that while Barbie could be shown as an example of secularism, how she was turned to be religious. Moreover the changes of Barbie occurred from globalization to glocalization were examined. Finally Barbie’s these last changes will whether or not eliminate feminist critics about Barbie was evaluated

Özet

Kişinin üyesi olduğu toplumun diğer üyelerince de tanınması ve toplum açısından ortak bir payda oluşturmasıyla bir ikon olarak nitelendirilebilecek Barbie, özel bir şirket tavrına, ideal kadın vücudu algısına, popüler kültürün moda kraliçeliğine ve son elli yılda dünya çapında fenomen olan bir markaya işaret etmektedir. Çalışmada bu yönleriyle Barbie ekseninde “modern” ve “postmodern” üzerine bir inceleme yapılması hedeflenmiştir. Öncelikle Barbie’nin Avrupa merkezcilik ve kültürel rölativizm bağlamında geçirdiği değişim ele alınmıştır. Daha sonra sekülerizmin bir örneği olarak gösterilebilecekken, nasıl dindarlaştırıldığı ve kapitalizmin bir ürünü olma özelliğini koruyarak, globalizasyondan glokalizasyona Barbie’de nelerin değiştiği incelenmiştir. Son olarak, Barbie’nin son zamanlarda geçirdiği değişimlerin, Barbie’ye feminist bakışça getirilen eleştirileri bertaraf edip edemeyeceği değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TATAR, D. B. (2022). Modernism To Postmodernism: Barbie. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 167–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/528817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. ASLAN, Seyfettin/YILMAZ, Abdullah, “Modernizme Bir Başkaldırı Projesi Olarak Postmodernizm”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 2, No.: 2. BADO-FRALICK, Nikki/NORRIS, Rebecca Sachs, Toying with God: The World of Religious Games and Dolls, Baylor University Press, 2010.
  2. BECK, Ulrich, Was Ist Globalisierung?, 1. Aufl., Schurkampf, Frankfurt/Main. BROWNELL, Kelly D./NAPOLITANO, Melissa A., “Distorting Reality For Children: Body Size Proportions of Barbie and Ken Dolls”, International Journal Eat Disord, Vol.: 18, No.: 3, 295-298.
  3. BRUZZI, Stella, Undressing Cinema: Clothing and Identity in the Movies, Routledge, London, New York, 1997.
  4. BULAÇ, Ali, Din ve Modernizm, Çıra Yayınları, İstanbul, 2012. Byron Lars Collection “Treasures of Africa”, http://www.thebarbiecollection.com/nne-barbie- doll-b3423, (erişim tarihi 21.03.2016).
  5. DE CERTEAU, Michel, Culture in the Plural, (ed. Luce Giard, trans. Tom Conley), Minneapolis, MN and London, University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
  6. DELIOVSKY, Kathy, “Normative White Femininity: Race, Gender and the Politics of Beauty”, Atlantis, Vol.: 33, No.: 1, 2008.
  7. DEMBNER, Alice, “Thirty-five and Still a Doll”, Boston Globe, 9 March, 1994.
  8. DITTMAR, Helga/HALLIWELL, Emma/IVE, Suzanne, “Does Barbie Make Girls Want to Be Thin? The Effect of Experimental Exposure to Images of Dolls on the Body Image of 5- to 8-Year-Old Girls”, Developmental Psychology, Vol.: 42, No.: 2, 2006, 283–292.
  9. DOCKTERMAN, Eliana, “A Barbie For Everybody”, Time, February 8, 2016.
  10. DOĞAN, İlyas, Devlet ve Toplum Kuramlarına Yeni Yaklaşımlar, 3. Baskı,
  11. Astana Yayınları,
  12. Ankara,
  13. DU BOIS, W.E.B., The Souls of Black Folk, Introduction and chronology by Jonathan Scott Holloway, Yale University Press, New Haven London, 2015.
  14. DUCILLE, Ann, Dyes and Dolls: Multicultural Barbie and Merchandising of Difference”, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, Vol.: 6, No.: 1, 1994.
  15. ERCAN, Fuat, Modernizm, Kapitalizm ve Azgelişmişlik, Bağlam Yayıncılık, İstanbul. Ethnicity, (ed. John Hutchinson, Anthony D. Smith), Oxford University Press,
  16. Oxford, New York, 1996.
  17. FILIPOVIC, Jill, “Barbie’s Problem is Far Beyond Skin-Deep”, Time, February 8, 2016.
  18. FORMANEK-BRUNELL, Miriam, Made to Play House: Dolls and the Commercialization of American Girlhood, 1830–1930,
  19. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore London, 1998.
  20. GIDDENS, Anthony, Modernliğin Sonuçları, (çev. Ersin Kuşdil), 5. Basım, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2012.
  21. GÖKALP, Emre, “Kültür ve