Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

The Relationship Between Bank Deposits And Industrial Production: A Causality Analysis On Monetary Transmission Mechanism

Banka Mevduatları ve Sanayi Üretimi İlişkisi: Parasal Aktarım Mekanizması Üzerine Bir Nedensellik İncelemesi

Pages
1717–1734
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In summary, it is concluded that the causality detected in the short-run istemporary and therefore cannot be permanent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The transfer of the savings to those with fund deficits constitutes the basis of financial markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, it is anotherexpectation that revenue increases as a result of increased production activities, and this is reflected in savings.In this study, which examines the causality relationship between deposit total and industrial production,Granger’s (1986) causality test and Breitung and Candelon (2006) frequency causality test are conductedthroughout January 2008 - December 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In summary, it is concluded that the causality detected in the short-run istemporary and therefore cannot be permanent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The transfer of the savings to those with fund deficits constitutes the basis of financial markets. Deposit banks,which are the leading actors of the money market, play an important intermediary role. Deposits are expectedto be transferred to deposits in banks directly or indirectly through investments. On the other hand, it is anotherexpectation that revenue increases as a result of increased production activities, and this is reflected in savings.In this study, which examines the causality relationship between deposit total and industrial production,Granger’s (1986) causality test and Breitung and Candelon (2006) frequency causality test are conductedthroughout January 2008 - December 2019. The obtained study results reveal the presence of a unilateralcausality between the change in industrial production and the change in the total of bank deposits. Accordingly,the change in industrial production causes changes in bank deposits in the short-run. In the long run, however,there is no such causal relationship. In summary, it is concluded that the causality detected in the short-run istemporary and therefore cannot be permanent.

Özet

Fon fazlası olanların, tasarruflarını fon açığı olanlara aktarması finansal piyasaların temelini oluşturur. Bu konuda para piyasasının öncü aktörü olan mevduat bankaları önemli birer aracı kurum rolü üstlenir. Mevduat bankalarda toplanan mevduatın doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak yatırımlar yoluyla üretime aktarılması beklenir. Diğer yandan, üretim faaliyetlerinin artmasının bir sonucu olarak gelirin artması ve bunun da tasarruflara yansıması diğer bir beklentidir. Mevduat toplamı ve sanayi üretimi arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisinin incelendiği bu çalışmada, Ocak 2008 – Aralık 2019 dönemi için Granger (1986) nedensellik testi ile Breitung ve Candelon (2006) frekans nedensellik testi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, sanayi üretimindeki değişim ile mevduatlardaki değişim arasında tek yönlü bir nedenselliğin varlığını ortaya koymaktadır. Buna göre, sanayi üretimindeki değişim kısa dönemde mevduatlardaki değişime neden olmaktadır. Uzun dönemde ise, herhangi bir nedensellik ilişkisi oluşmamaktadır. Özetle, kısa dönemde tespit edilen nedenselliğin geçici olduğu, dolayısıyla kalıcı olmayacağı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, H. E. (2022). The Relationship Between Bank Deposits And Industrial Production: A Causality Analysis On Monetary Transmission Mechanism. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 1717–1734. https://ajindex.com/articles/519067

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahad, M., Dar, A. A. & M. Imran, M. (2017). Does financial development promote ındustrial production in pakistan? evidence from combine cointegration and causality approach. Germany: University Library of Munich, Ahmed, H. & Miller, S. M. (1997). Monetary and exchange rate policy in multisectoral economies. Journal of Economics and Business, 49 (4), 321-334.
  2. Ahmed, S. (1987). Wage stickiness and the non-neutrality of money: a cross-ındustry analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 20 (1), 25-50.
  3. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Cambridge, MA, 84 (3), 488-500.
  4. Angelonı, I., Kashyap, A. & Mojon, B. (2003). Monetary policy transmission in the euro area. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  5. Anyanwu, F., Ananwude, A. & Okoye, N. (2017). An empirical assessment of the ımpact of commercial banks’ lending on economic development of nigeria. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 1 (1), 14-29.
  6. Bernanke, B. S. & Blinder, A.S. (1988). Credit, money and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, 78 (2), 435-439.
  7. Bernanke, B. S. &. Blınder, A.S. (1992). The federal funds rate and the transmission of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 82 (4), 901-921.
  8. Bernanke, B. S. & Gertler, M. (1986). Agency costs, collateral, and business fluctuations (No. w2015),
  9. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Bernanke, B.S. & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the black box: the credit channel of monetary policy transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 27-48.
  10. Berument, M. H., Ceylan, N.B. & Yücel, E. (2004). The differential sectoral effects of policy shocks: evidence from Turkey. Working Paper, No. 0703, Bilkent University, Department of Economics. Breitung, J. & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short and long-run causality: a frequency domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132 (2), 363-378. Bulíř, A. (2001). Inequality: Does inflation matter? IMF Staff Papers, 48 (1), 139-159.
  11. Claus, I. & Grimes, A. (2003). Asymmetric information, financial ıntermediation and the monetary transmission mechanism: a critical review. Treasury Working Paper Series 03/19, New Zealand Treasury. Dağıdır, C. (2010). Türk bankacılık sektöründe karlılık ve makro ekonomik değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, (1), s.25-33.
  12. Dale, S. & Haldane, A.G. (1995). Interest rates and the channels of monetary transmission: some s