Journals / Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

An Analysis Of The Logistics And Environmental Performance Of Bri Countries

Kuşak Yol Ülkelerinin Lojistik ve Çevresel Performansının Analizi

Pages
1893–1915
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the environmental and logistics performance evaluation, Singapore in 2014 and Greece in 2016 and 2018 ranked first among the countries with the best environmental and logistics performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to evaluate the environmental and logistics performance of Belt and Road countries through integrated Entropy-TOPSIS methods within the scope of Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) sub-criteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research, the environmental and logistics performance of the countries that handle five hundred thousand TEU containers annually within the scope of the Belt Road project created in 2013 was evaluated according to the sub-criteria scores of the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) reports for the years 2014, 2016 and 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the environmental and logistics performance evaluation, Singapore in 2014 and Greece in 2016 and 2018 ranked first among the countries with the best environmental and logistics performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research is to evaluate the environmental and logistics performance of Belt and Road countries through integrated Entropy-TOPSIS methods within the scope of Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) sub-criteria. In the research, the environmental and logistics performance of the countries that handle five hundred thousand TEU containers annually within the scope of the Belt Road project created in 2013 was evaluated according to the sub-criteria scores of the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) reports for the years 2014, 2016 and 2018. According to the results of the environmental and logistics performance evaluation, Singapore in 2014 and Greece in 2016 and 2018 ranked first among the countries with the best environmental and logistics performance. Singapore, Slovenia, Portugal Greece, Myanmar, Italy, United Arab Emirates, Israel and Kuwait in 2014, Greece, Italy, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, Portugal, Slovenia, Philippines, Lebanon, Thailand, Israel, Kenya, Malaysia, Turkey in 2016 and Algeria, and in 2018, Greece, Italy, Romania, Russia, Israel, Portugal, Kuwait, Malaysia, Lebanon, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Algeria were determined to be successful countries in environmental and logistics performance evaluation. In addition, it was concluded that China, Hong Kong, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Philippines in 2014, Myanmar and Pakistan in 2016 and Pakistan and India in 2018 were unsuccessful countries in environmental and logistics performance evaluation. In the research, it was seen that air quality in 2014, water and sanitation in 2016, water resources in 2018 were the highest scoring criteria, and the efficiency of customs control transactions for 2014, 2016 and 2018 were the lowest scoring criteria

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Kuşak Yol ülkelerinin çevresel ve lojistik performansını Lojistik Performans Endeksi(LPI) ve Çevresel Performans Endeksi (EPI) alt kriterleri kapsamında bütünleşik Entropi-TOPSISyöntemleriyle değerlendirmektir. Araştırmada 2013 yılında oluşturulan Kuşak Yol projesi kapsamında yıllıkbeş yüz bin TEU konteyner elleçleyen ülkelerin 2014, 2016 ve 2018 yılları Lojistik Performans Endeksi (LPI)ve Çevre Performans Endeks (EPI) raporlarında yer alan alt kriter puanlarına göre çevresel ve lojistikperformansının değerlendirmesi yapılmıştır. Çevresel ve lojistik performans değerlendirmesi sonucuna göre2014 yılında Singapur, 2016 ve 2018 yılında Yunanistan ilk sırada yer alarak en iyi çevresel ve lojistikperformans gösteren ülkeler olmuştur. 2014 yılında Singapur, Slovenya, Portekiz Yunanistan, Myanmar,İtalya, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri, İsrail ve Kuveyt, 2016 yılında Yunanistan, İtalya, Romanya, Rusya, Ukrayna,Portekiz, Slovenya, Filipinler, Lübnan, Tayland, İsrail, Kenya, Malezya, Türkiye ve Cezayir ve 2018 yılındaYunanistan, İtalya, Romanya, Rusya, İsrail, Portekiz, Kuveyt, Malezya, Lübnan, Singapur, Birleşik ArapEmirlikleri, Mısır ve Cezayir çevresel ve lojistik performans değerlendirmesinde başarılı ülkeler olduğubelirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, 2014 yılında Çin, Hong Kong, Hindistan, Kenya, Pakistan ve Filipinler, 2016 yılındaMyanmar ve Pakistan ve 2018 yılında Pakistan ve Hindistan çevresel ve lojistik performansdeğerlendirmesinde başarısız ülkeler olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmada 2014 yılında hava kalitesi,2016 yılında su ve sanitasyon, 2018 yılında su kaynakları en yüksek puanlı kriterler ve 2014, 2016 ve 2018yılları için gümrük kontrol işlemlerinin verimliliği en düşük puanlı kriter olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKANDERE, G. (2022). An Analysis Of The Logistics And Environmental Performance Of Bri Countries. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 1893–1915. https://ajindex.com/articles/519021

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aboul-Dahab, K. ve Ibrahim, M. A. (2020). Investigating the efficiency of the logistics performance index (LPI) weighting system using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, International Journal of Science and Research, 9, 269-277. Antão, P., Calderón, M., Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C. ve Darbra, R. M. (2016). Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance ındicators ın port areas, Safety Science, 85, 266–275.
  2. Ayçin, E. ve Çakın, E. (2019). Ülkelerin çevresel performanslarının çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ve bulanık mantık tabanlı bir yaklaşım ile bütünleşik olarak değerlendirilmesi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14(3), 631-656.
  3. Bilbao-Terol, A., Arenas-Parra, M., Cañal-Fernández, V. ve Antomil-Ibias, J. (2014). Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds. Omega, 49, 1-17.
  4. BRI Big Data Report. (2017). Big Data Report of the Trade Cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative. Erişim Tarihi: 15. 02. 2021, https://eng.yidaiyilu.gov.cn/qwyw/rdxw/2201.htm.
  5. Cansız, Ö. F. ve Ünsalan, K. (2020). Yapay zekâ ve istatistiksel yöntemler ile küresel ticarette rekabet ölçütü olan lojistik performans endeksine (LPI) etken parametrelerin ülke bazlı incelenmesi ve tahmin modellerinin geliştirilmesi, Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 32(2), 571-582.
  6. Çakır, S. (2017). Measuring logistics performance of OECD countries via fuzzy linear regression, Journal of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3-4), 177-186.
  7. Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., Willis, R. J. (2000), Inter-company comparison using modified topsis with objective weights, Computers and Operations Research, 27, 963–973.
  8. Dianawati, F. ve Perdana, W. S. (2019). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and topsıs for designing green public procurement indicator on trans-java toll rest area, In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering, 237- 242. EPI, (2020b). Environmental performance index 2020 report, Erişim Tarihi: 22. 02. 2021, https://epi.yale.edu/downloads/epi2020report20210112.pdf EPI, (2021a). Environmental performance index rankings, Erişim Tarihi: 10. 02. 2021, www.epi.yale.edu EPI, (2021c). About the environmental performance index, Erişim Tarihi: 22. 02. 2021, https://epi.yale.edu/about-epi ESI, (2021).
  9. Environmental sustainability index, Erişim Tarihi: 11. 06. 2021, https://sedac.ciesi