Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2008 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of quality of life in different regions of musculoskeletal diseases

Farklı bölge kas iskelet sistemi hastalıklarında yaşam kalitesinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
123–128
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: A difference was found in age and occupation distribution in the sub-groups with respect to demographic features (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics and quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal system disorders localized in various regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among these patients, 3 different groups were formed as low back, neck and multi-involved and they were compared with respect to NHP.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: A difference was found in age and occupation distribution in the sub-groups with respect to demographic features (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics and quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal system disorders localized in various regions. Material and methods: Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was applied in order to measure life qualities of the patients and a questionnaire of personal information was given. Among these patients, 3 different groups were formed as low back, neck and multi-involved and they were compared with respect to NHP. Binary comparisons were performed in parameters which demonstrated a difference. Demographic properties, exercise habits and pain severity that is measured with visual analog scale were taken down. Low back pain, neck and multi-involved patient group’s results were compared. Results: A difference was found in age and occupation distribution in the sub-groups with respect to demographic features (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, farklı bölgelerde lokalize olan kas iskelet sistemi problemlerinin yaşam kalitesi üzerindeki etkileri ile demografik özellikleri karşılaştırmak amaçlandı. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya kas iskelet sistemi problemi olan 171 hasta katıldı. Yaşam kalitesini ölçmek amacıyla Nottingham Sağlık Profili ve kişisel bilgileri içeren bir anket uygulandı. Demografik özellikler, egzersiz alışkanlığı ve görsel analog skalası kullanılarak ölçülen ağrı şiddeti kaydedildi. Bel, boyun ve çoklu tutulumu olan hastaların sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Sonuçlar: Gruplar arasında yaş ve meslek dağılımı, Nottingham Sağlık Profili, fiziksel mobilite ve ağrı parametrelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olduğu saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GEZİCİ, B., ÖZDİNÇ, A. S., KOKİNO, S., HAKGÜDER, A., TURAN, F. N. (2022). Comparison of quality of life in different regions of musculoskeletal diseases. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 123–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/516888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Özdemir F, Kokino S, Taştekin N. Osteoporozlu hastalarda Nottingham Sağlık Profilinin kullanımı. Osteoporoz Dünyasından. 1999;5:119-124
  2. Birtane M, Tuna H, Ekuklu G, et al. Edirne Huzurevi sakinlerinde yaşam kalitesine etki eden etmenlerin irdelenmesi. Geriatri. 2000;3:141-145
  3. Kind P, Carr-Hill R. The Nottingham Health Profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists? Soc Sci Med. 1987; 25:905-910
  4. Berker E. Bel ağrılarında epidemiyoloji ve risk faktörleri. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 1998;44:3 (www.ftr.org.tr, 8 Kasım 2007
  5. Oğuz H. Kronik ağrı tedavisi. In: Hasan O, ed. Tıbbi Rehabilitasyon. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri Ltd Şti; 1995: 685- 695
  6. Yurtkuran M, Alp A, Konur S, et al. Laser acupuncture in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25:14-20
  7. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. Measurement of health status in patients with chronic illness: comparison of the Nottingham health profile and the general health questionnaire. Fam Prac. 1990;7:121-124
  8. Madenci E, Gürsoy S, Büyükbeşe Aİ. Diz osteoartritli olgularda iyontoforez ve fonoforez yöntemlerinin etkinliklerinin ve yaşam kalitesine olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Romatoloji ve Tıbbi Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2002;13: 98-101
  9. Hepgüler S, Şahin Y, Barış M, et al. Gonartrozlu hastalarda klinik bulgularda çeşitli yaşam kalitesi ölçümleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 1988;1:49-54
  10. Sivas F, Erçin O, Tanyolaç O, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation with other health status measurements and clinic variables. Rheumatol Int. 2004;24:203-206
  11. Van Schoor NM, Smit JH, Twisk JW, et al. Impact of vertebral deformities osteoarthritis and other chronic diseases on quality of life: a population-based study. Osteporos Int. 2005;16:749-756
  12. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34:281-286
  13. Ebrahim S, Barer D, Nouri F. Use of the Nottingham Health profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;40:166-169
  14. Wann-Hansson C, Hallberg IR, Risberg B, et al. A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:9
  15. Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, Korb J, et al. Health-related qual