Journals / Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon / 2006 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Yaşlılarda yapısal ayak deformitelerinin ayak fonksiyonları üzerine etkisi

Effect of structural foot deformities on foot function in the elderly

Pages
84–88
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed that there was a statistically significant correlation only between walking speed, total muscle strength and foot function index (r=0.353-0.499, p0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine how structural foot problems affected foot function and walking speed in the elderly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Thirty nine elderly retirement home residents without significant disease and an average age of 74.36±7.71 (55-91) years were assessed for presence of deformity, the severity-rigidity and symptoms of that deformity, and the number of deformities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed that there was a statistically significant correlation only between walking speed, total muscle strength and foot function index (r=0.353-0.499, p0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine how structural foot problems affected foot function and walking speed in the elderly. Materials and methods: Thirty nine elderly retirement home residents without significant disease and an average age of 74.36±7.71 (55-91) years were assessed for presence of deformity, the severity-rigidity and symptoms of that deformity, and the number of deformities. Subjects were also evaluated for total muscle strength of related muscles, Foot Function Index (FFI) and comfortable walking speed of 100 meters. Correlations between these parameters were investigated. Results: The results showed that there was a statistically significant correlation only between walking speed, total muscle strength and foot function index (r=0.353-0.499, p0.05). Conclusion: To provide an insight for the complex nature of elderly foot problems factors like foot pain, nail problems and hyperkeratotic lesions should also be taken into consideration besides structural foot deformities.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, yapısal ayak problemlerinin geriatriklerde ayak fonksiyonu ve yürüme hızını nasıl etkilediğini belirlemek üzere gerçekleştirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Belli bir hastalığı olmayan, ve yaş ortalaması 74.36±7.71 (55-91) yıl olan huzurevinde yaşayan 39 yaşlı üzerinde deformite varlığı, de/ormitenin şiddeti-rijiditesi, semptomları ve deformite sayısı değerlendirildi. Ayrıca olguların ilgili kaslarda kas kuvveti, Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi (FFI) ve 100 metre yürüyüş hızları değerlendirildi. Bu parametreler arasındaki korelasyon incelendi. Sonuçlar: Sadece yürüme hızı ile toplam kas kuvveti ve ayak fonksiyon indeksi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı korelasyon bulundu (r: 0.353-0.499, p0.05). Tartışma: Geratriklerde ayak problemlerinin karmaşık doğasını kavrayabilmek için yapısal ayak deformitelerinin yanı sıra ağrı, tırnak problemleri ve hiperkeratotik lezyonlar gibi faktörler de göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, E., BEK, N., KAVLAK, Y., YAKUT, Y., EREL, S., UYGUR, F., MUTLU, A. (2022). Yaşlılarda yapısal ayak deformitelerinin ayak fonksiyonları üzerine etkisi. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 84–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/650641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Markinson BC. Three-step approach to in-office assessment of the geriatric foot. Geriatrics. 2001;56:48- 52
  2. Menz HB, Lord SR. The contribution of foot problems to mobility impairment and falls in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1651-1656
  3. Menz HB, Lord SR. Foot pain impairs balance and functional ability in community-dwelling older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91:222-229
  4. Davidovich O. An overview of the painful geriatric foot. Geriatr Aging. 2003;6:26-29
  5. Reuben DB, Valle LA, Hays RD, et al. Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: a comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:17-23
  6. VanSwearingen JM, Brach JS. Making geriatric assessment work: Selecting useful measures. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1233-1252
  7. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Analysis of clinical grading scales for the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:443-446
  8. Shrader JA, Popovich JM Jr, Gracey GC, et al. Navicular drop measurement in people with rheumatoid arthritis: Interrater and intrarater reliability. Phys Ther. 2005;85:656-664
  9. Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: Reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:864-871
  10. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys MedRehabil. 1995;76:45-49
  11. Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: A measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:561-570
  12. Kuyvenhoven MM, Gorter KJ, Zuithoff P, et al. The foot function index with verbal rating scales (FFI-5pt): A clinimetric evaluation and comparison with the original FFI. JRheumatol. 2002;29:1023-1028
  13. Cress ME, Schechtman KB, Mulrow CD, et al. Relationship between physical performance and self- perceived physical function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:93-101
  14. Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: Reference values and determinants. Age Aging. 1997;26:15-19
  15. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002;82:128-137
  16. Peel C, Sawyer Baker P, Roth DL, et al. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment. Phys Ther. 2005;85:1008-1019.