Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35

The determinants of currency substitution in turkish economy: a bound testing approach to cointegration

Türk ekonomisinde para ikamesinin belirleyicilerinin sınır testi yaklaşımı ile eş-bütünleşme analizi

Pages
199–231
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main policy implication that follows from this study is that central bank's gross foreign exchange reserves are important to prevent currency substitution

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper analyzes the relationships between currency substitution, trade openness, expected real exchange rate, expected inflation rates and interest rate differentials between Turkey and USA.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The bound test approach is applied in the analysis between 1988 and 2009 for Turkish economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main policy implication that follows from this study is that central bank's gross foreign exchange reserves are important to prevent currency substitution
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationships between currency substitution, trade openness, expected real exchange rate, expected inflation rates and interest rate differentials between Turkey and USA. It also especially examines central bank's gross foreign exchange reserves in the analysis. The bound test approach is applied in the analysis between 1988 and 2009 for Turkish economy. The findings show that, in the long run, all the variables have positive impact on currency substitution. The analysis indicates that all variables are significant at the 10 percent level and with the expected sign, except for trade openness. The main policy implication that follows from this study is that central bank's gross foreign exchange reserves are important to prevent currency substitution

Özet

Bu çalışma ticarî dışa açıklık, beklenen döviz kuru, beklenen enflasyon oranı ve Türkiye ile ABD arasındaki reel faiz oranları farkı ile para ikamesi arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmektedir. Belirtilen değişkenlerin yanı sıra özellikle merkez bankasının brüt döviz rezervleri analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada 1988 ve 2009 yılları arasında Türk ekonomisi için sınır testi yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları para ikamesi ile tüm açıklayıcı değişkenler arasında pozitif ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ticarî dışa açıklık dışında, tüm açıklayıcı değişkenlerin uzun dönemde %10 önem düzeyinde anlamlı olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın temel politika sonucu ise, merkez bankasının brüt döviz rezervlerinin para ikamesinin önlenmesinde önem arz etmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMRUL, C. (2022). The determinants of currency substitution in turkish economy: a bound testing approach to cointegration. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 35, 199–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/503579

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADANUR-AKLAN, Nejla; (2001), “Para İkamesi Süreci ve Türkiye Örneği”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 7(1), ss. 197–207. ALESINA Alberto ve Robert J. BARRO; (2001), “Dollarization”, The American Economic Review, 91(2), ss. 381–385
  2. ASTERIOU, Dimitrios ve Stephen G. HALL; (2007),
  3. Applied Econometrics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 436s. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, Mohsen ve Ilker DOMAC; (2003), “On the Link between Dollarisation and Inflation: Evidence from Turkey”, Comparative Economic Studies, 45(3), ss. 306–328.
  4. BAŞKURT, Özge; (2005), Financial Dollarization and Currency Substitution in Turkey, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 78s. BENCIVENGA, Valerie R.; Elisabeth HUYBENS ve Bruce D. SMITH; (2001), “Dollarization and the Integration of International Capital Markets: A Contribution to the Theory of Optimal Currency Areas”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(2), ss. 548–589.
  5. BORDO, Michael D. ve Ehsan U. CHOUDHRI; (1982), “Currency Substitution and the Demand for Money: Some Evidence for Canada”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 14(1), ss. 48–57.
  6. BUFMAN, Gil ve Leonardo LEIDERMAN; (1993), “Currency Substitution under Nonexpected Utility: Some Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(3), ss. 320–335.
  7. CALVO, Guillermo ve Carlos VEGH; (1992), “Currency Substition in Developing Countries: An Introduction”, IMF Working Paper, No: 92/40, İnternet Adresi: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=884762Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2010. CATÃO, Luis ve Marco TERRONES; (2000), “Determinants of Dollarization: The Banking Side”, IMF Working Paper, WP/99/146, İnternet Adresi: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/wp00146.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2010.
  8. CLEMENTS, Benedict ve Gerd SHWARTZ; (1992), “Currency Substitution: The Recent Experience of Bolivia”, IMF Working Paper, İnternet Adresi: http://papers.ssrn.com, Erişim Tarihi: 04.05.2010.
  9. CİVCİR, İrfan; (2003a), “Dollarization and Its Long-run Determinants in Turkey”, Middle East Economics Series, İnternet Adresi: www.ecomod.net/conferences/ecomod2002/papers/civcir.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2004.
  10. CİVCİR, İrfan; (2003b); “Money Demand, Financial Liberalization and Currency Substitution in Turkey”, Journal of Economic Studies, 30(5), ss. 514–534.
  11. DANIEL, Betty C. ve Harold O. FRIED; (1983), “Currency Substitution, Postal Strikes, and Canadian Money Demand”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 16(4), ss. 612–624.
  12. DORNBUSCH, Rudiger ve Alejandro REYNOSO; (1989), “Financial Factors in Economic Deve