Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53

CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN CARRY TRADE INVESTMENTS AND ITS DETERMINANTS: THE CASE OF TURKEY

CARRY TRADE YATIRIMLARI VE BELİRLEYİCİLERİ ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
309–324
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to asymmetric causality results; there are significant causal relationships from interest rate differentials, VIX and S&P-500 index to carry trade volume.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Carry trade which focuses on making profit from interest rate differentials between countries in low exchange rate volatility; constitute a significant portion of short-term capital movements to developing countries such as Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, causal relationship between carry trade volume realized on US dollar basis in Turkey and its determinants examined for the period 2005:M09-2018:M08.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to asymmetric causality results; there are significant causal relationships from interest rate differentials, VIX and S&P-500 index to carry trade volume.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Carry trade which focuses on making profit from interest rate differentials between countries in low exchange rate volatility; constitute a significant portion of short-term capital movements to developing countries such as Turkey. In this context, it is important to determine the direction and degree of the relationship between carry trade investments and its determinants. In this study, causal relationship between carry trade volume realized on US dollar basis in Turkey and its determinants examined for the period 2005:M09-2018:M08. According to frequency domain causality results; there are strong causal relationships from nominal exchange rate, interest rate differences, VIX and BIST-100 index to carry trade volume. According to asymmetric causality results; there are significant causal relationships from interest rate differentials, VIX and S&P-500 index to carry trade volume.

Özet

Düşük kur oynaklığında, ülkeler arasındaki faiz oranı farklılıklarından kazanç elde etmeyedayanan carry trade yatırımları Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelere yönelik kısa vadeli sermayehareketlerinin önemli kısmını oluşturmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, carry trade yatırımları ve belirleyicileriarasındaki ilişkinin yönü ve derecesinin tespit edilmesi önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada Türkiye için2005:09 ve 2018:08 döneminde ABD doları bazında gerçekleşen carry trade işlem hacmi vebelirleyicileri arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Frekans alanı nedensellik sonuçlarına göre;nominal döviz kuru, faiz oranı farklılıkları, VIX ve BIST-100 endeksinden carry trade işlem hacminedoğru güçlü nedensellik ilişkileri mevcuttur. Asimetrik nedensellik sonuçlarına göre de faiz oranıfarklılıkları, VIX ve S&P-500 endeksinden carry trade işlem hacmine doğru anlamlı nedensellikilişkileri bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZ, M. (2022). CAUSAL RELATION BETWEEN CARRY TRADE INVESTMENTS AND ITS DETERMINANTS: THE CASE OF TURKEY. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 53, 309–324. https://ajindex.com/articles/503458

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Ames, M., Bagnarosa, G., ve Peters, G. W. (2017). Violations of uncovered interest rate parity and international exchange rate dependences. Journal of International Money and Finance, 73, 162-187.
  2. Aydın, F. ve Us, V. (2007). Carry trade: Gelişmeler ve riskler. TİSK Akademi Dergisi, 2(3), 175-185.
  3. Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (2003a). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22.
  4. Bai, J. ve Perron, P. (2003b). Critical values for multiple structural change tests, Econometrics Journal, 6, 72-78.
  5. Bhansali, V. (2007).
  6. Volatility and the carry trade, Journal of Fixed Income, 17(3), 72-84.
  7. Bleaney, M. ve Laxton, D. (2003). Real interest rates and real exchange rates: Evidence from indexed bonds, The Manchester School, 71(1), 65-77.
  8. Breitung, J. ve Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach, Journal of Econometrics, 132, 363-378.
  9. Clarida, R., Davis, J., ve Pedersen, N. (2009). Currency carry trade regimes: Beyond the Fama Regression, Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(8), 1375-1389.
  10. Czech, K. ve Washkovski, A. (2012). Financial determinants of carry trade activity, Oeconomia, 11(4), 15-22.
  11. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Econometrica, 49, 1057- 1072. Erdem, E. ve Ulucak, R. (2016). Efficiency of stock exchange markets in G7 countries: Bootstrap causality approach, Economics World, 4(1), 17-24.
  12. Ferreira, L. A. (2009). Is it risk? An automated approach to explain the ex-ante UIP deviations of Brazil, Cuadernos de Economia, 46, 51-66.
  13. Flood, R. P. ve Rose A. K. (2002).
  14. Uncovered interest parity in crisis, IMF Staff Papers, 49(2), 252-266.
  15. Frankel, J. (2007). “Getting Carried Away: How the carry trade and its potential unwinding can explain movements in international financial markets”, The Milken Institute Review, 19, 1-21.
  16. Fung, H. G., Tse, Y., ve Zhao L. (2013). Are stock markets in Asia related to carry trade?, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25, 200-216.
  17. Gacener Atış, A. ve Erer, D. (2016). Türkiye ekonomisinin carry trade odaklı büyüme trendi: 2002-2016 dönemi analizi, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Economics by Turkish Economic Assocation içinde (ss. 488-501).
  18. Ankara.
  19. Hatemi-J, A. ve Roca, E. (2014a). BRICs And PIGS in the presence of Uncle Sam and Big Brothers: Who drive who? Evidence based on asymmetric causality tests, Griffith Business School Discus