SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 55

THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE TAX ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT

KURUMLAR VERGİSİNİN DOĞRUDAN YABANCI SERMAYE YATIRIMLARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Gamze ÖZ-YALAMAN
Pages
221–243
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that there are 15 countries efficient for maximizing FDI by using corporate tax rate while 20 countries are inefficient and the average efficiency scores range from 100% to 30.93%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper primarily investigates the effect of corporate tax on foreign direct investment inflows using data from a panel of 35 countries over the period between 2005 and 2016.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The paper finds that the impact of corporate tax rates on foreign direct investment inflows is significantly negative.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that there are 15 countries efficient for maximizing FDI by using corporate tax rate while 20 countries are inefficient and the average efficiency scores range from 100% to 30.93%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper primarily investigates the effect of corporate tax on foreign direct investment inflows using data from a panel of 35 countries over the period between 2005 and 2016. The paper finds that the impact of corporate tax rates on foreign direct investment inflows is significantly negative. Also, the paper calculates relative efficiency scores and potential recovery rates of 35 countries by using Data Envelopment Analysis in order to help policymakers about how to change corporate tax rates so that FDI becomes efficient. The results show that there are 15 countries efficient for maximizing FDI by using corporate tax rate while 20 countries are inefficient and the average efficiency scores range from 100% to 30.93%.

Özet

Bu çalışma ilk olarak kurumlar vergisi oranlarının doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarına etkisini araştırmaktadır. Bu kapsamda çalışmada 2005- 2016 yılları için 35 ülkeye ait panel veri seti kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada kurumlar vergisi oranlarının doğrudan yabancı sermaye girişlerine olan etkisinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve negatif olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada ikinci olarak, göreli olarak daha etkin doğrudan yabancı sermaye girişleri elde edebilmek için kurumlar vergisi oranının nasıl değiştirilmesi konusunda yol gösterebilmek amacıyla ülkelerin göreli etkinlik puanları ve potansiyel iyileştirme oranları hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, kurumlar vergisi oranını kullanarak etkin doğrudan yabancı sermaye girişleri elde edebilen 15, elde edemeyen 20 ülkenin olduğunu göstermektedir. Ülkelerin ortalama etkinlik puanları % 100 ile % 30.93 arasında değişmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ-YALAMAN, G. (2022). THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE TAX ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 55, 221–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/503429

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., and Sayek, S. (2004). “FDI and economic growth,” The role of local financial markets, Journal of International Economics, 64: 113-134.
  2. Aziz, O.G. (2018). “Institutional quality and FDI inflows in Arab economies,” Finance Research Letters, 25: 111-123.
  3. Aziz, O.G. and Mishra, A.V. (2016). “Determinants of FDI inflows to Arab economies,” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3): 325-356.
  4. Baldwin, R.E. (1963). “Export technology and development from a subsistence level,” The Economic Journal, 73(289): 80-92.
  5. Barassi, M.R. and Zhou, Y. (2012). “The effect of corruption on FDI: A parametric and non-parametric analysis,” European Journal of Political Economy, 28: 302-312.
  6. Barrios, S., Huizinga, H., Laeven, L. and Nicodème, G. (2009). “International taxation and multinational firm location decisions,” Economic Papers 356, European Commission. Beck, S. and Chaves, A. (2012). “The impacts of various taxes on foreign direct investment,” University of Delaware, Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics, Working Paper No. 2011-18.
  7. Becker, J., Fuest, C. and Riedel, N. (2012). “Corporate tax effects on the quality and quantity of FDI,” European Economic Review, 56: 1495-1511.
  8. Benassy-Quere, A., Fontagne, L. and Lahreche-Revil, A. (2005). “How does FDI react to corporate taxation?,” International Tax and Public Finance, 12: 583–603.
  9. Boateng, A., Hua, X., Nisar, S. and Wu, J. (2015). “Examining the determinants of inward FDI: evidence from Norway,” Economic Modelling, 47: 118-127.
  10. Boskin, M.J. and Gale, W.G. (1987). “New results on the effects of tax policy on the international location of investment,” The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation, ed. Martin Feldstein, University of Chicago Press, ISBN: 0-226-24088-6: 201-222.
  11. Boussofiane, A., Dyson R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991). “Applied data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1): 1-15.
  12. Campos, N.F. and Kinoshita, Y. (2003). “Why does FDI go where it goes? New evidence from the transition economies,” IMF Working Paper, WP/03/228. Cassou, S.P. (1997). “The link between tax rates and foreign direct investment,” Applied Economics, 29(10): 1295-1301.
  13. Chakrabarti, A. (2001). “The determinants of foreign direct investment: sensitivity analyses of cross-country regressions,” KYKLOS, 54: 89-114.
  14. Chanegriha, M., Stewart, C. and Tsoukis, C. (2017). “Identifying the robust economic, geographical and political determinants of