SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

The Impact of Globalization on Corporate Taxation: Evidence from The KOF Globalization Index

Küreselleşmenin Kurumlar Vergilendirmesi Üzerine Etkisi: KOF Küreselleşme Endeksi’nden Bulgular

Gamze Öz-yalaman(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, MALİYE BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-4760-523X
Deniz Sevinç(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6223-9450
Güven Sevil(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, AÇIKÖĞRETİM FAKÜLTESİ)
Pages
350–369
Publication Date
2019-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The empirical results suggest a negative relationship between globalization and corporate tax.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increase in globalization has led to the redefinition of the tax policy perceptions of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increase in globalization has also led to pressures on governments to revise their taxation policies in order to compensate for the potential risks that may arise.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The empirical results suggest a negative relationship between globalization and corporate tax.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Küreselleşme · Kurumlar Vergi Oranı · Panel Veri

Abstract

The increase in globalization has led to the redefinition of the tax policy perceptions of countries. The increase in globalization has also led to pressures on governments to revise their taxation policies in order to compensate for the potential risks that may arise. It is noteworthy that many countries around the world have reduced corporate tax rates in recent years. Thus, this paper investigates the role of increasing globalization in this process of decline. For this, the paper tests whether globalization has a significant effect on corporate taxation by using a panel of 33 countries over the period 1998-2016. The paper takes into account three main dimensions of globalization: economic, trade and politics. Moreover, the paper uses the two different measurements of globalization: de facto and de jure . The empirical results suggest a negative relationship between globalization and corporate tax. The results are robust in terms of different dimensions and measurements of globalization. It can be concluded that global integration does matter for policymakers and increasing integration also influences independent national fiscal and economic policies of countries.

Özet

Küreselleşmedeki artış, ülkelerin vergi politikalarını yeniden tanımlamalarına yol açmaktadır. Ayrıca küreselleşme ortaya çıkabilecek olası riskleri telafi etme amacıyla hükümetler üzerinde vergi politikalarını gözden geçirme baskısı da yaratmıştır. Bu kapsamda dünyada birçok ülkenin son yıllarda kurumlar vergisi oranlarını düşürmüş olması dikkat çekicidir. Bu nedenle, çalışma, küreselleşme artışının bu düşüş sürecindeki rolünü araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada, 1998-2016 dönemi için 33 ülkeden oluşan panel veri seti kullanılarak, küreselleşmenin kurumlar vergisi üzerinde önemli bir etkisinin olup olmadığı test edilmiştir. Çalışmada küreselleşmenin ekonomi, ticaret ve politika olmak üzere üç ana boyutu ele alınmıştır. Bunun yanında de facto ve de jure olmak üzere iki farklı ölçüm yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Ampirik sonuçlar, küreselleşme ile kurumlar vergisi arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, küreselleşmenin farklı boyutları ve ölçümleri açısından da tutarlıdır. Küresel entegrasyonun politika yapıcılar için önemli olduğu ve entegrasyonun artmasının ülkelerin bağımsız ulusal mali ve ekonomik politikalarını da etkilediği sonucuna varılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öz-yalaman, G., Sevinç, D., Sevil, G. (2019). The Impact of Globalization on Corporate Taxation: Evidence from The KOF Globalization Index. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 350–369. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.632288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Adam, A., & Kammas, P. (2007). Tax policies in a globalized world: Is it politics after all?. Public Choice, 133(3-4), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9190-9
  2. Adam, A., Kammas, P., & Lagou, A. (2013). The effect of globalization on capital taxation: What have we learned after 20 years of empirical studies?. Journal of Macroeconomics, 35, 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.09.003
  3. Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003). Economic geography and public policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  4. Baldwin, R., & Krugman, P. (2004). Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation. European Economic Review, 48(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00318-5
  5. Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2002). Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: Theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(4), 695-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00115-5
  7. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2005). Globalization and international tax competition: Empirical evidence based on effective tax rates. Journal of Economic Integration, 20(3), 530-542. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
  8. Clausing, K. A. (2008). Closer economic integration and corporate tax systems. Global Economy Journal, 8(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1359
  9. Dreher, A. (2002). Does globalization affect growth? (University of Mannheim Working Paper). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.348860
  10. Dreher, A. (2005). Globalization and taxation in the OECD: Evidence from a new indicator of integration. Public Finance and Management, 5(3), 400-420. Retrieved from https://pfm.spaef.org/
  11. Dreher, A. (2006a). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
  12. Dreher, A. (2006b). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.04.006
  13. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalisation-gauging its consequences. NY: Springer.
  14. Egger, P. H., Nigai, S., & Strecker, N. M. (2019). The taxing deed of globalization. American Economic Review, 109(2), 353-390. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160600
  15. Exbrayat, N. (2017). Does trade liberalisation trigger tax competition? Theory and evidence from OECD Countries. The World Economy, 40(1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12405
  16. Garrett, G. (1995). Capital mobility, trade, and the domestic politics of economic policy. International Organization, 49(4), 657-687. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
  17. Gelleny, R., & McCoy, M. (2001). Globalization and government policy independence: The Issue of Taxation. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.2307/449268
  18. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index –revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2
  19. Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. (1998). Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD Countries: The importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31(3), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031003003
  20. Hansson, A., & Olofsdotter, K. (2003). The effects of tax competition and new economic geography on taxation in OECD Countries (Lund University Working Papers). Lund: Lund University.
  21. Hays, J. (2003). Globalization and capital taxation in consensus and majoritarian democracies. World Politics, 56(1), 79-113. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0004
  22. Heinemann, F. (2000). Does globalization restrict budgetary autonomy?. Intereconomics, 35(6), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02930289
  23. Kenny, L. W., & Winer, S. L. (2006). Tax systems in the world: An empirical investigation into the importance of tax bases, administration costs, scale and political regime. International Tax and Public Finance, 13(2), 181-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-3564-7
  24. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, Jr. J. S. (2000). Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what?). Foreign Policy, 118, 104-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149673
  25. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  26. Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the inequality of nations (NBER Working Paper No. w5098). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=225876
  27. Kubátová, K., Vančurová, A., & Foltysová, M. (2008). Impact of globalization on taxation mixes in OECD Countries during 1965-2003. Prague Economic Papers, 17(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.318
  28. Kumar M. S., & Quinn, D. P. (2012). Globalization and corporate taxation (IMF Working Papers No: 12/252). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/ Globalization-and-Corporate-Taxation-40059
  29. Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2005), The CSGR globalization index: An introductory guide (Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization). Retrieved from https://www.warwick.ac.uk /fac/soc/csgr/index
  30. Ludema, R. D., & Wooton, I. (2000). Economic geography and the fiscal effect of regional integration. Journal of International Economics, 52(2), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00050-1
  31. Mendoza, E. G., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., & Asea, P. (1997). On the ineffectiveness of tax policy in altering long-run growth: Harberger's superneutrality conjecture. Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00011-X
  32. Neumann, R., Holman, J., & Alm, J. (2009). Globalization and tax policy. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(2), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2009.02.001
  33. Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90036-9
  34. Onaran, Ö., & Boesch, V. (2014). The effect of globalization on the distribution of taxes and social expenditures in Europe: Do welfare state regimes matter?. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(2), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45370
  35. Onaran, O., Boesch, V., & Leibrecht, M. (2012), How does globalization affect the implicit tax rates on labor income, capital income, and consumption in the European Union?. Economic Inquiry, 50(4), 880-904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00420.x
  36. Overesch, M., & Rincke, J. (2009). Competition from low wage countries and the decline of corporate tax rates: Evidence from European Integration. The World Economy, 32(9), 1346-1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01214.x
  37. Quinn, D. (1997). The correlates of change in international financial regulation. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 531-551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952073
  38. Quinn, D., & Inclan, C. (1997). The origins of financial openness: A study of current and capital account liberalization. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 771-813. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111675
  39. Ranjan, P., & Gozgor, G. (2018). Globalization and taxation: Theory and evidence (Working Paper No: 181903). Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:irv:wpaper:181903
  40. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalisation gone too far?. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  41. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (1999). Globalisation of the economy and nation state. The World Economy, 22(3), 295-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00205
  42. Slemrod, J. (2004). Are corporate tax rates, or countries, converging?. Journal of Public Economics, 88(6), 1169-1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00061-6
  43. Swank, D. (1998). Funding the welfare state: Globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Political Studies, 46(4), 671-692. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00161
  44. Swank, D. (2016). Taxing choices: International competition, domestic institutions and the transformation of corporate tax policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(4), 571-603, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1053511
  45. Swank, D., & Steinmo, S. (2002). The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 642-655. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088405
  46. Tanzi, V. (2000). Globalization, technological developments, and the work of fiscal termites (IMF Working Paper No: 00/181). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/ wp00181.pdf
  47. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
  48. Wibbels, E., & Arce, M. (2003). Globalization, taxation, and burden-shifting in Latin America. International Organization, 57(1), 111-136. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571041
  49. Wildasin, D. E. (1988). Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition. Journal of Public Economics, 35(2), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90055-2
  50. Wilson, J. D. (1991). Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21(3), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90066-V
  51. Wilson, J. D. (1995). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52(2), 269-304. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/
  52. Winner, H. (2005). Has tax competition emerged in OECD Countries? Evidence from panel data. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(5), 667-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-2915-0
  53. Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 356-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(86)90048-3