SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30

Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyete mahalle yönetimi

Esra IŞIK
Musa ŞAHİN
Pages
221–229
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, the inverted U-shaped relationship between income and environmental sustainability, corruption variable loses its significance when included in the model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study, using data for 43 countries, a comparative analysis is the relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to estimations made by the method of OLS, there is negative and significant relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, the inverted U-shaped relationship between income and environmental sustainability, corruption variable loses its significance when included in the model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study, using data for 43 countries, a comparative analysis is the relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability. According to estimations made by the method of OLS, there is negative and significant relationship between corruption and environmental sustainability. The study also tested the Environmental Kuznets Curve is valid or not. Accordingly, the inverted U-shaped relationship between income and environmental sustainability, corruption variable loses its significance when included in the model.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 43 ülke verisinin yardımıyla, yozlaşma ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkiyi karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmektir. EKK yöntemiyle yapılan tahminlemeye göre yozlaşma ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasında negatif yönlü ve anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Araştırmada ayrıca Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisinin geçerli olup olmadığı da sınanmıştır. Buna göre, gelir ile çevresel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ters U şeklinde ilişki, yozlaşma değişkeni modele dahil edildiğinde anlamlılığını yitirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, E., ŞAHİN, M. (2022). Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyete mahalle yönetimi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30, 221–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/493252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. CARTER, T. S. (1997), “The failure of environmental regualiton in New York: the role of co-optation, corruption, and a co-operative enforcement approach”, Crime Law and Social Change, 26 (1): 27-52.
  2. DAMANIA, R., P., G., FREDRIKSSON ve A., J., LIST (2003), “ Trade Liberalization, corruption, and environmental polcy formulation: theory and evidenve”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46 (3): 490-512.
  3. DALY, H. E. (1993), “The Perils of Free Trade”, Scientific American, 269: 50-57.
  4. DILLON, J., E., KARMA, A., FEIGHERY ve R., GARRET (2006), “Corruption & The Environment” http://www.transperancy.org.ru/ doc/Columbia_Universty_Workshop_May2006_0I000_184.pdf (Erişim: 30.04.2011).
  5. DOIG, A. ve S., McIVOR (1999) “Corruption and its control in the developmental context: an analysis and selective review of the literature”, Third World Quarterly, 20(3): 657-676.
  6. ER, Mevliyar (2008), “Corruption from the Islamic Perspective: Some Recommendations for the MENA Region”, International Journal and Middle Eastern Finance and Mangement, 1(1): 31-51.
  7. FABER, D. (1992), “The Ecological Crisis of Latin America: A Theoretical Introduction”, Latin Amerikan Perspectives, 19 (1): 3-16.
  8. FINNIE, Bruce W., Linda K., GIBSON, David E., MCNABB (2006), “Economic Development: Corruption, Complexity, Wealth, and aTriad of Strains”, Humanomics, 22(4): 185-204.
  9. GENTRY, B. (1998), Private Capital Flows and the Environment: Lessons from Latin America, Edward Elgar Pres, UK. GLOBAL LEADERS (2001), Pilot Environmental Sustainability Index, World Economic Forum 2001,
  10. Davos, İsviçre. GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 353-377.
  11. GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1993), “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, (Editör: P. M. GARBER), The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, MIT Pres, Cambridge, ss: 13-56.
  12. GUJARATI, Damodar N. (2006),
  13. Temel Ekonometri, Şenesen, Ümit, Gülay Günlük, Şenesen (Çev), Literatür Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  14. HOFSTEDE, G. H. (1983), “National Cultures in Four Dimensions”, International Studies of Management and Organization, 13: 46-74.
  15. KAYRAK, Musa (2008), “Evolving Challenges for Supreme Audit Institutions in Struggling with Corruption”, Journol of Financial Crime, 15(1): 60-70.
  16. KOTLOBAY, A. (2002), “Illegal Logging in the Southern Part of the Russian Far East: Problem Analysis and Proposed Solution – A case study on experiences of Log Tracking and Chain of Custody P