SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY CHANGES IN GROWING PATIENTS WITH CLASS II MALOCCLUSION AFTER FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE TREATMEN

BÜYÜMESi DEVAM EDEN SINIF 2 HASTALARDA FONKSiYONEL TEDAVi SONRASI FARiNGEAL HAVAYOLUNUN DEğişiMi

Bengisu Akarsu Güven
Aslıhan Zeynep Öz
Pages
13–21
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although the FR group showed positive changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions, no significant difference was found in the intergroup comparison of pharyngeal measurements

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aim: This retrospective study of 41 patient records aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two functional appliances in changing pharyngeal airway dimensions and compare these results with untreated patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 15 patients were treated with Frankel 2 appliances (FR group) and 15 patients treated with Activator (AC group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although the FR group showed positive changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions, no significant difference was found in the intergroup comparison of pharyngeal measurements
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aim: This retrospective study of 41 patient records aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two functional appliances in changing pharyngeal airway dimensions and compare these results with untreated patients. Material and Method: 15 patients were treated with Frankel 2 appliances (FR group) and 15 patients treated with Activator (AC group). The control group included 11 patients who did not receive orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric radiographs were performed pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2). A paired sample t test or Mann Whitney U test was used for intra- group comparisons according to the distribution of the data. Analysis of variance with Tukey’s tests was used to compare the difference between the groups. A level of p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In the FR group, statistically significant differences were found between the T1 and T2 radiographs in the superior pharyngeal airway space (SPAS), inferior pharyngeal airway space-2 (GoB-IAS), and vertical airway length (VAL) measurements. In the AC group, only inferior pharyngeal airway space (IPAS) measurements showed a statistically significant difference between the T1 and T2 radiographs. In the control group, VAL measurement was statistically significantly different between the T1 and T2 radiographs. Conclusion: Although the FR group showed positive changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions, no significant difference was found in the intergroup comparison of pharyngeal measurements

Özet

Amaç: 41 hastanın kayıtlarını içeren bu retrospektif çalışma iki farklı fonksiyonel apareyin faringeal havayolu boyutlarında meydana getirdiği değişiklikleri değerlendirmeyi ve bu sonuçların tedavi edilmeyen hastalar ile karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 15 hasta Frankel 2 apareyi (FR grup), 15 hasta da Aktivatör (AC grup) ile tedavi edildi. Kontrol grubunu ise ortodontik tedavi görmeyen 11 hasta oluşturdu. Tedavi öncesi (T1) ve tedavi sonrası (T2) sefalometrik radyograflar kullanıldı. Grup içi karşılaştırmalar için verilerin dağılımına göre eşleştirilmiş t testi ve Mann Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Gruplar arası karşılaştırma için Tukey testi kullanıldı. p< 0.05 istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi. Bulgular: FR grubunda üst faringeal havayolu boşluğu (SPAS), alt faringeal havayolu boşluğu-2 (GoB-IAS) ve vertikal havayolu uzunluğu (VAL) ölçümlerinde T1 ve T2 arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık vardı. AC grubunda sadece alt faringeal havayolu boşluğu (IPAS) ölçümünde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık vardı. Kontrol grubunda ise VAL istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık gösterdi. Sonuç: FR grubu, faringeal hava yolu boyutlarında olumlu değişiklikler göstermesine rağmen, faringeal ölçümlerin gruplar arası karşılaştırmasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı

🔖

Cite This Article

Güven, B. A., Öz, A. Z. (2022). PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY CHANGES IN GROWING PATIENTS WITH CLASS II MALOCCLUSION AFTER FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE TREATMEN. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 13–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/474508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Figueroa AA, Glupker TJ, Fitz MG, BeGole EA. Mandible, tongue, and airway in Pierre Robin sequence: a longitudinal cephalometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 425-434
  2. Carroll JL. Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children: new controversies, new directions. Clin Chest Med 2003; 24: 261- 282
  3. Praud JP, Dorion D. Obstructive sleep disordered breathing in children: beyond adenotonsillectomy. Pediatr Pulmonol 2008; 43: 837-843
  4. Bacon WH, Krieger J, Turlot JC, Stierle JL. Craniofacial characteristics in patients with obstructive sleep apneas syndrome. Cleft Palate J 1988; 25: 374-378
  5. Jamieson A, Guilleminault C, Partinen M, Quera-Salva MA. Obstructive sleep apneic patients have craniomandibular abnormalities. Sleep 1986; 9: 469-477
  6. Lowe AA, Gionhaku N, Takeuchi K, Fleetham JA. Three- dimensional CT reconstructions of tongue and airway in adult subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 364-374
  7. Tsuchiya M, Lowe AA, Pae EK, Fleetham JA. Obstructive sleep apnea subtypes by cluster analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 533-542
  8. Robin P. Glossoptosis due to atresia and hypotrophy of the mandible. American Journal of Diseases of Children 1934; 48: 541- 547. 9. de Freitas MR, Alcazar NM, Janson G, de Freitas KM, Henriques JF. Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with class I and class II malocclusions and different growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 742–745 10. Hanggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomaki TA. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator- headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod.2008; 30: 598–605
  9. Bollhalder J, Hanggi MP, Schatzle M, Markic G, Roos M, Peltomaki TA. Dentofacial and upper airway characteristics of mild and severe class II division 1 subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35: 447–453 12. Handelman CS, Osborne G. Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteeen years. Angle Orthod 1976; 46: 243-259
  10. Crouse U, Laine-Alava MT, Warren DW. Wood CL. A longitudinal study of nasal airway size from age 9 to age 13. Angle Orthod 1999; 69(5): 413-418
  11. Godt A, Koos B, Hagen H, Goz G. Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 440-446
  12. Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gogen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in