SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF HEADGEAR TRACTION ON MAXILLARY THIRD MOLAR ANGULATION

HEADGEARIN ÜST ÜÇÜNCÜ MOLAR DİŞLERİN ANGULASYONU ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Bahadır KAN
Bengisu AKARSU GÜVEN
İlken KOCADERELİ
Pages
63–68
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The angulations of the rightand left maxillary third molars were compared with the verticalaxis of the adjacent second molars and in relation to theocclusal and orbital planes before and at the end of orthodontictreatment.Results: Compared with pre-treatment measurements, theaverage maxillary second and third molar angulations afterorthodontic treatment with distalization by using the cervicalheadgear did not differ significantly (p>0.05).Conclusion: The effect of maxillary first molar distalizationon the angulation of the maxillary third molar appears to beminimal before the eruption of the maxillary second molar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aim: To assess the changes in theangulation of maxillary third molar during orthodontictreatment in subjects having distalization of maxillary firstmolar with cervical headgear.Subjects and Methods: In this retrospective study, thesample consisted of 40 subjects (22 males and 18 females)with a mean age of 11.9 ± 0.8 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In pre-treatment (T1) andpost-treatment (T2), panoramic radiographs as the horizontalreference lines, the occlusal, and the orbital planes wereused to measure and compare changes in the position of thedeveloping maxillary third molars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The angulations of the rightand left maxillary third molars were compared with the verticalaxis of the adjacent second molars and in relation to theocclusal and orbital planes before and at the end of orthodontictreatment.Results: Compared with pre-treatment measurements, theaverage maxillary second and third molar angulations afterorthodontic treatment with distalization by using the cervicalheadgear did not differ significantly (p>0.05).Conclusion: The effect of maxillary first molar distalizationon the angulation of the maxillary third molar appears to beminimal before the eruption of the maxillary second molar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aim: To assess the changes in theangulation of maxillary third molar during orthodontictreatment in subjects having distalization of maxillary firstmolar with cervical headgear.Subjects and Methods: In this retrospective study, thesample consisted of 40 subjects (22 males and 18 females)with a mean age of 11.9 ± 0.8 years. In pre-treatment (T1) andpost-treatment (T2), panoramic radiographs as the horizontalreference lines, the occlusal, and the orbital planes wereused to measure and compare changes in the position of thedeveloping maxillary third molars. The angulations of the rightand left maxillary third molars were compared with the verticalaxis of the adjacent second molars and in relation to theocclusal and orbital planes before and at the end of orthodontictreatment.Results: Compared with pre-treatment measurements, theaverage maxillary second and third molar angulations afterorthodontic treatment with distalization by using the cervicalheadgear did not differ significantly (p>0.05).Conclusion: The effect of maxillary first molar distalizationon the angulation of the maxillary third molar appears to beminimal before the eruption of the maxillary second molar.

Özet

Amaç: Servikal headgear uygulaması ile maksiller birinci molar distalizasyonu yapılan bireylerde ortodontik tedavinin maksiller üçüncü molar angulasyonunda oluşturduğu değişiklikleri değerlendirmektir. Bireyler ve Yöntem : Bu retrospektif çalışmaya, ortalama yaşı 11,9 ± 0,8 yıl olan 40 birey (22 erkek, 18 kız) dahil edildi. Tedavi öncesi (T1) ve tedavi sonrası (T2) panoramik radyograflarda gelişmekte olan üçüncü molarların pozisyonundaki değişiklikleri ölçmek ve karşılaştırmak için horizontal referans düzlemleri olarak oklüzal düzlem ve orbital düzlem kullanıldı. Sağ ve sol maksiller üçüncü molarların angulasyonları tedavi öncesi ve sonrasında komşu ikinci moların vertikal ekseni ile ve oklüzal ve orbital düzlemlerle yaptığı açıya göre karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Tedavi öncesi ölçümlerle karşılaştırıldığında, ortalama maksiller ikinci ve üçüncü molar angulasyonları servikal headgear ile distalizasyon yapılan ortodontik tedaviden sonra anlamlı farklılık göstermedi (p>0.05). Sonuç: Maksiller birinci molar distalizasyonunun maksiller üçüncü molar angulasyonuna etkisi maksillar ikinci moların erüpsiyonundan önce minimal olarak görünmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KAN, B., GÜVEN, B. A., KOCADERELİ, İ. (2022). EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF HEADGEAR TRACTION ON MAXILLARY THIRD MOLAR ANGULATION. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/474584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Shpack N, Brosh T, Mazor Y, Shapinko Y, Davidovitch M, Sarig R et al. Long- and short-term effects of headgear traction with and without the maxillary second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146: 467-476.
  2. Flores-Mir C, McGrath L, Heo G, Major PW. Efficiency of molar distalization associated with second and third molar eruption stage. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 735-742.
  3. Tarazona B, Paredes V, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL. Influence of first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e760-766 Russell B, Skvara M, Draper E, Proffit WR, Philips C, White RP Jr. The association between orthodontic treatment with removal of premolars and the angulation of developing mandibular third molars over time. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 376-380.
  4. Staggers JA, Germane N, Fortson WM. A comparison of the effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulation. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 135-138.
  5. Jain S, Valiathan A. Influence of first premolar extraction on mandibular third molar angulation. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 1143- 1148. Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 126-132.
  6. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. III. Inclined objects. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1981; 22: 585-592.
  7. Hardy TC, Suri L, Stark P. Influence of patient head positioning on measured axial tooth inclination in panoramic radiography. J Orthod 2009; 36: 103-110.
  8. Topkara A, Sari Z. Investigation of third molar impaction in Turkish orthodontic patients: Prevalence, depth and angular positions. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: S94-98. Saysel MY, Meral GD, Kocadereli I, Tasar F. The effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulations. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 719-722
  9. Bayram M, Ozer M, Arici S. Effects of first molar extraction on third molar angulation and eruption space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: e14-20. Janson G, Putrick LM, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, Henriques RP. Maxillary third molar position in Class II malocclusions: the effect of treatment with and without maxillary premolar extractions. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 573-579.
  10. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J