SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

The evaluation of relationship between social support and hopelessness in hemodialysis patients

Hemodiyaliz hastalarında sosyal destek ve umutsuzluk arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi

Neşe ERDEM
Ayşe OKANLI
Elanur KARABULUTLU
Mehtap TAN
Pages
32–39
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a negative correlation between perceived social support from their families and hopelessness (r.-269, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted with the purpose of determining the relationship between social support perceived and hopelessness in hemodialysis patients.The data were collected using a questionnaire determining the sociodemographic features and ' 'Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support' '(MSPSS), ' 'Beck Hopelessness Scale" (BUÖ) to have been addressed 136 patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the statistical evaluating of the data were used percentage, Kruskall Wallis, Mann Whitney U, t- test and correlation analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a negative correlation between perceived social support from their families and hopelessness (r.-269, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted with the purpose of determining the relationship between social support perceived and hopelessness in hemodialysis patients.The data were collected using a questionnaire determining the sociodemographic features and ' 'Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support' '(MSPSS), ' 'Beck Hopelessness Scale" (BUÖ) to have been addressed 136 patients. In the statistical evaluating of the data were used percentage, Kruskall Wallis, Mann Whitney U, t- test and correlation analysis. The mean scores of the perceived social support from their families, friends and nurses were 23.3 ±4.8, 15.5 ±6.9 and 22±8.1 respectively. The mean score of total social support was 59.3±8 their mean hopelessness score was 8.8±5.1. There was a negative correlation between perceived social support from their families and hopelessness (r.-269, p

Özet

Bu çalışma hemodiyaliz hastalarının algıladıkları sosyal destek ile umutsuzlukları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Veriler sosyodemograflk özellikleri belirleyen bir anket, "Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği" (MSPSS), "Beck Umutsuzluk Ölçeği" (BUÖ) ile 136 hastadan elde edilmiştir. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde yüzdelik, Kruskall Wallis (KW), Mann Whitney U (MWU), t- testi ve korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Hastaların aileden algıladıkları sosyal destek puan ortalamaları 23.3±.4.8, arkadaşlardan 15.5±6.9, hemşirelerden 22±8.1, toplam destek puan ortalaması 59.3±8, umutsuzluk puan ortalaması ise 8.8±5.1 olarak bulunmuştur. Aileden algılanan sosyal destek ile umutsuzluk arasında negatif yönde ilişki saptanmıştır (r.-269,p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, N., OKANLI, A., KARABULUTLU, E., TAN, M. (2022). The evaluation of relationship between social support and hopelessness in hemodialysis patients. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 32–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/453288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Abramson I, Metalsky -GL, Alloy LB (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review. 96:358-372.
  2. Abram HS, Moore GL, Westervelt FB (1971). Suicidal behavior in chronic dialysis patients. Am J Psychiatry. 127:119-127.
  3. Argon G (2002). Kronik hastalıklara uyum. Kronik hastalıklarda bakım. İntertıp Tıbbi Yayıncılık. İzmir.
  4. Bayramova N, Karadakovan A (2004). Kronik hastalığı olan bireylerin umutsuzluk durumlarının incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv.HYO Derg. 7(2):39-47.
  5. Christensen AJ, Wiebe JS, Smith TW et al. (1994). Predictors of Survival among hemodialysis patients: effect of perceived family support. Health Psychol. 13(6):521-5.
  6. Christensen AJ, Smith TW, Turner CW et a!.(1992). Family support, physical impairment, and adherence in hemodialysis: an investigation of main and buffering effects. J Behav Med. 15(4):313-325.
  7. Conley JA et al. (1981). Support systems for patients and spouses on home dialysis. Int J Family Psychiatry. 2:45-54.
  8. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enss M et al. (1998). Depression, hopelessness and suicidal ideation. Psychosomatics. 39:366-370.
  9. Eker D, Arkar H (1995) Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 10(34);45-55.
  10. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H (2001). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 12(1): 17-25
  11. Foster FG, McKegney FP (1978). Small group dynamics and survival on chronic hemodialysis. Int J Psiychiatry Med. 8:105-116.
  12. Friend R, Singletary Y, Mendell NR et al. (1986). Group participation and survival among patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Public Health. 76:670-672.
  13. Holder B (1997). Family support and survival among African-America end-stage renal disease patients. Adv Ren Replace Ther. 4(1): 13-21.
  14. Hupcey JE (1998). Social support: Assessing conceptual coherence. Qual Health Res 8:304-318.
  15. Kimmel PL, Thamer M, Richard CM et al. (1998). Psychiatric illness in patients with end-stage renal disease. Am J Med. 105:214-221.
  16. Kumbasar H (1997). Kronik böbrek yetmezliği, diyaliz ve psikososyal sorunlar. Ege Psikiyatri Sürekli Yayınları. Konsültasyon Liyezon Psikiyatrisi.2(1): 169- 77. Kelleci M, Doğan S (1998). Fiziksel hastalıklarla birlikte depresyonu olan hastalara hemşirelerin yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi. Uluslararası katılımlı VI. Ulusal Hemşirelik Kongresi. 14-16
  17. Mayıs, Ankara. 88-93.
  18. Loscalzo M (1996). Psychological approaches