Bilateral indirekt inguinal hernia (olgu sunumu)

Objective & Hypothesis:In 1998-1999 academic year, 65 year old male cadaver was dissected in Gaziantep University, Medicine Faculty, Dept. of Anatomy and bilateral indirect inguinal hernia was observed in this cadaver.

📊

Key Findings & Data:In the inguinal canal, there was caecum in right side and was the greater omentum in left side.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:It was found that caecum was adhesion to the posterior and exterior walls of the inguinal canal.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In 1998-1999 academic year, 65 year old male cadaver was dissected in Gaziantep University, Medicine Faculty, Dept. of Anatomy and bilateral indirect inguinal hernia was observed in this cadaver. In the inguinal canal, there was caecum in right side and was the greater omentum in left side. It was found that caecum was adhesion to the posterior and exterior walls of the inguinal canal. For this case, the literature was examined and discussed.

Özet

1998-1999 ders yılında Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anatomi Anabilim Dalı'nda eğitim-öğretim amacı ile diseke edilen 65 yaşında erkek bir kadavrada bilateral indirekt inguinal hernia saptandı. Sağda inguinal kanal içerisinde caecum'un, solda ise omentum majus'un girdiği gözlendi. Caecum'un inguinal kanalın arka ve dış duvarına adhese olduğu tespit edildi. Olgu nedeni ile literatür gözden geçirilerek tartışıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAVİ, A., ERBAĞCI, H., KIZILKAN, N., GÜMÜŞBURUN, E. (2022). Bilateral indirekt inguinal hernia (olgu sunumu). Anadolu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 58–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/438183

References (10)

Chin T, Liu C,Wei C. The morphology of the contralateral internal inguinal ring is age-dependent in children with unilateral inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1663-1665
Dere F. Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. 5. baskı, S.272-276, Adana Nobel Tip Kitabevi, Adana, 1999
McGregor DB, Halverson K, Mc Vay CB. The unilateral pediatric hernia: should the controlateral side be explored? J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15: 313-317
Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T. Meta-analysis of the risk of metachoronous hernia in infants and children. Am J Surg 1997;174: 741-744
Moore KL. The Developing Human, 4 th Ed., pp.279-282, W.B.Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 1988
Moore KL. Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 3 th Ed., pp.147, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1992
Netter FH: The Cıba Collection of Medical illustrations; vol 2/3, pp.204-206, Cıba Pharmaceutical Co,New york, 1979
Sancak B,Cumhur M. Fonksiyonel Anatomicontralateral inguinal hernia: a prospective (Baş-Boyun İç Organlar), ss.212-214, Metu analysis, J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:684~688. Press Yayıncılık ve İletişim A.Ş., Ankara, 1999
Surana R, Puri P. Is contralateral exploration necessary in infants with unilateral inguinal hernia? J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:1026-1027
Tackett LD, Breuer CK. Luks FI, Caldamone AA, Breuer JG, DeLuca FG, Caesar RE,Efthemiou E, Wesselhoeft CW. Incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia: a prospective analysis, J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:684-688.