SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The evaluation of the conditions of the Multidimensional scale of perceived social support the partner of the patient suffering from myocardial infarction

Miyokard infarktüsü geçiren hasta eşlerinin sosyal destek durumlarının değerlendirilmesi

Seher ERGÜNEY
Mehtap TAN
Pages
37–43
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a positive relation only between income level and the scores of MSPSS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Evaluation Of The Conditions Of The Multidimensional Scale Of Perceived Social Support The Partner Of The Patients Suffering From Myocardial Infarction The aim of this study was to assess the social support perceived by the spouses of patients with myocardial infarction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected with Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to have been addressed 52 wives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a positive relation only between income level and the scores of MSPSS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Evaluation Of The Conditions Of The Multidimensional Scale Of Perceived Social Support The Partner Of The Patients Suffering From Myocardial Infarction The aim of this study was to assess the social support perceived by the spouses of patients with myocardial infarction. Data were collected with Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to have been addressed 52 wives. The mean scores of the perceived social support from their families, friends and nurses were 21.76±4.52, 19.63±4.18 and 16.00±3.22, respectively. The mean score of the total social support was 57.19±8.14. At the end of the research, the score of the perceived social support from nurses was more lower than those of families and friends. There were not a meaningful relation among the gender, the education level, the residence and the family type of the spouse of patients, and the scores of MSPSS. There was a positive relation only between income level and the scores of MSPSS.

Özet

Bu çalışma miyokard infarktüsü tanısı alan bireylerin eşlerinin algıladıkları sosyal desteğin durumunu değerlendirmek amacı ile yapılmıştır. Veriler ' 'Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği" (MSPSS) ile 52 eşten elde edilmiştir. Eşlerin aileden algıladıkları sosyal destek puan ortalamaları 21.76±4.52, arkadaşlardan 19.63± 4.18, özel bir birey (hemşirelerden) 16.00±3.22, toplam sosyal destek puan ortalaması ise 57.19±8.14 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda hemşirelerden algılanan sosyal destek puanı, aile ve arkadaştan algılanan sosyal destekten düşük olarak bulunmuştur. Eşlerin cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi, yaşadıkları yer, aile tipi ile çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek puanları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanamamıştır. Aylık gelir ile anlamlı ilişki saptanmıştır (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜNEY, S., TAN, M. (2022). The evaluation of the conditions of the Multidimensional scale of perceived social support the partner of the patient suffering from myocardial infarction. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/453350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adela Y et al. (2001). Social support and well-being in early adolescents. Clinical Nursing Research. 10:163. Argon G. (2002). Kronik hastalıklara uyum. Kronik hastalıklarda bakım.ss:37-44.
  2. Barrera MJR, Ainlay S (1983). The structure of social support: A coceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Comminity Psychology. 11:133-143.
  3. Chen WH, Yao JP. An investigation on the family support of discharged acute myocardial infarction patients. Zhonghua Hu LiZaZhi. 32(12):683-6.
  4. Cochrane JJ et al. (1997). The mental health of informal caregives in Ontario: An epidemioiogical survey. Am J Public Health. 87(12):2002-2007.
  5. Coyne JC, Downey G (1991). Social factors and psychopathology, stres, social support and coping processes. Annual Review Psychology. 42:401-425.
  6. Davis MH et al. (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support:Associatiwith well-being and attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 74:468-481.
  7. Eker D, Arkar H (1995). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 10(34);45-55.
  8. Eker D ve ark (2001). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 12(1): 17-25.
  9. EH K (1996). Social Networks social support and coping with serious illness. The family connection. Soc Sci Med. 42(2): 173-183.
  10. Kessler RC et al. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: stress social support and coping processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 36:531- 572. Kettunen S et al. (1999). Myocardial infarction, spouses' reactions and their need of support. J Adv Nurs. 30(2):479-88.
  11. King KB et a I. (1993). Social support and long-term recovery from coronary artery surgery: Effects on patients and spouses. Health Psychol. 12(l):56-63,
  12. Mollaoğlu M (1997). Kritik bakım ünitelerinin duyusal girdilere etkileri ve hemşirelik girişimleri. YBHD. !(2):86-90.
  13. Procidona ME, Heller K (1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family. Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology. 11: 1-24.
  14. Riley D, Eckinrode J (1986). Social Ties: Subgroup differences, costs and benefit. J Pers Soc Psych. 51: 770-778.
  15. Santavirta N et al. (2001). Coping in spouses of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the early phase of recovery. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 16( 1 ):34-46.
  16. Sorias O (1989). Toplumdan seçilmiş bir örneklemde sosyal ağın yapısal özellikleri ile algılanan destek. Psikoloji Seminer Derg. 7:27-40. Sorias O(