Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23

LATE CLASSICAL PERIOD LOCAL BOWLS FROM KLAZOMENAI

Klazomenai Geç Klasik Dönem Yerel Üretim Kâseleri

Pages
109–141
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to present a typology and chronology of these local bowls that are common in the Late Classical layers of Klazomenai based on the architectural phases of the settlement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The local bowls constitute one of the most important groups among pottery finds from Klazomenai.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These bowls, as a characteristic representative of the Late Classical Period layers dated from the late 5th to mid- 4th centuries B.C., are studied under a typology based on their morphological and decorative features.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to present a typology and chronology of these local bowls that are common in the Late Classical layers of Klazomenai based on the architectural phases of the settlement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The local bowls constitute one of the most important groups among pottery finds from Klazomenai. These bowls, as a characteristic representative of the Late Classical Period layers dated from the late 5th to mid- 4th centuries B.C., are studied under a typology based on their morphological and decorative features. These common semi-fine table wares imply that the shapes and decorative patterns of the Late Archaic Period and persisted on a large scale even during the Late Classical Period. The new features on these bowls were somewhat restricted and were apparent mainly in the second quarter of the 4th century B.C. It is determined that there were some influences of contemporary popular black-glazed Attic pottery on these local bowls in terms of the shape and the decorations. The aim of this study is to present a typology and chronology of these local bowls that are common in the Late Classical layers of Klazomenai based on the architectural phases of the settlement.

Özet

Klazomenai’da açığa çıkan seramik buluntular arasındaki en büyük kümelerden birini yerel üretimkâseler oluşturmaktadır. Yerleşimin 5. yüzyıl sonlarından 4. yüzyıl ortasına kadar tarihlenen Geç KlasikDönem evresinin en karakteristik temsilcileri arasında yer alan kâseler bu çalışmada temel form ve be-zeme özelliklerine göre oluşturulan bir tipoloji içerisinde incelenmektedir. Bu yaygın, yarı kaliteli masakapları Geç Arkaik Dönem’deki form ve bezeme şemalarının Klazomenai’da Geç Klasik Dönem’de debüyük çapta devam ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu kâselere Geç Klasik Dönem’de eklenen yeni özellikler isesınırlı boyuttadır ve genellikle 4. yüzyılın ikinci çeyreğinde ortaya çıkarlar. Dönemin yaygın siyah firnisliAttika seramiklerinin de bu kâselerin form ve bezeme sisteminde belirli etkileri tespit edilmiştir. Bu ça-lışmanın amacı Klazomenai’ın Geç Klasik Dönem tabakalarında yaygın biçimde ele geçen yerel üretimkâselerin, yerleşmenin mimari evrelerine dayanan bir kronolojik dizinini ve tipolojisini sunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASDAĞLI, S. M. Z. (2022). LATE CLASSICAL PERIOD LOCAL BOWLS FROM KLAZOMENAI. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23, 109–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/448240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alexandrescu 1972: P. Alexandrescu, “Un groupe de céramique fabriquée à Istros”, Dacia 6, 113–131. Alexandrescu 1978.
  2. P. Alexandrescu, La céramique d’époque archaïque et classique (VIIe-IVe siècle), Histria IV, Bucureşti. Arrıbas et al. 1978:
  3. A. Arribas, G. Trías, D. Cerdá, J. de Hoz, El barco de El Sec (Calvià, Mallorca): estudio de los materiales, Mallorca. Artzy ve Lyon 2003:
  4. M. Artzy, J. Lyon, “The Ceramics”, in: E. Linder, Y. Kahanov (eds.), The Ma’agan Mikhael Ship. The Recovery of a 2400-Year Old Merchantman, Final Report 1, Jerusalem, 183–202. Aytaçlar 1998:
  5. M.N. Aytaçlar, Klazomenai Khyton’daki Yapı Evreleri (Ege Üniversitesi, yayınlanmamış lisans tezi), İ zmir. Berlın 2002: A.M. Berlin, “Ilion before Alexander: A Fourth Century B.C. Ritual Deposit”, Studia Troica 12, 131–166. Blegen et al. 1964:
  6. C.W. Blegen, H. Palmer, R.S.Young, The North Cemetery, Corinth Vol: XIII, Princeton. Blondé 1985. F. Blondé, “Un remblai thasien du IVe siècle avant notre ère”, BCH 109, 281–344. Blondé 1989: F. Blondé, “Les abords N.-E. de l’agora de Thasos. 3. La céramique”, BCH 113, 481–545. Blondé 2007: F. Blondé, Les céramiques d’usage quotidien à Thasos au IVe siècle avant J.-C., Paris. Boardman 1967:
  7. J. Boardman, Excavations in Chios 1952–1955,
  8. Greek Emporio, BSA Suppl. 6, Oxford. Boardman ve Hayes 1973:
  9. J. Boardman ve J. Hayes, Excavations at Tocra 1963-1965. The Archaic Deposits II and Later Deposits, Oxford. Boehlau ve Schefold 1940:
  10. J. Boehlau ve K. Schefold, Larisa am Hermos Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 1902–1934, Band 3: Die Kleinfunde, Berlin. Boulter 1953: C. Boulter, “Pottery of the Mid-Fifth Century from a Well in the Athenian Agora”, Hesperia 22, 59-115. Cambıtoglou et al. 2001:
  11. A. Cambitoglou, J.K. Papadopoulos, O.T. Jones (eds.), Torone I. The Excavations of 1975, 1976, and 1978, Athens. Carlson 2003: D. N. Carlson, “The Classical Shipwreck at Tektaş Burnu, Turkey”, AJA 107, 581–600. Cıstov ve Domzalskı 2002:
  12. D.E. Cistov, K. Domzalski, “Nymphaion. Results of Excavations in Sector N, 1994–1998”, ArcheologiaWarsz 52, 97–138. Coldstream 1999: J.N. Coldstream, “Knossos 1951– 61. Classical and Hellenistic Pottery from the Town”, BSA 94, 321–351. Coldstream 1968:
  13. J.N. Coldstream, Greek Geometric Pottery. A Survey of Ten Local Styles and Their Chronology, London. Coldstream et al. 2001:
  14. J.N. Coldstream, L.J. Eiring, G. Forster, Knossos Pottery Handbook. Greek and Roman, BSA Studies 7, London. Coleman ve Abramovıtz 1986:
  15. J.E. Coleman, K. Abramovitz, Excavat