SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Colloquium Anatolicum / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 14

Klazomenai Lahitleri Üzerinde Betimlenen Barbar Figürleri

S. Melike HASDAĞLI ZEREN
Pages
130–159
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the inconsistencies between the cases make the possibility of the historical reality almost unlikely

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to discuss the ethnical identity of the figures depicted on the Klazomenian Sarcophagi.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reliability of identities of the figures which mainly rise on the bases of their costumes, arms and equipments, is under question.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the inconsistencies between the cases make the possibility of the historical reality almost unlikely
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lahit · İonia · İskit

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the ethnical identity of the figures depicted on the Klazomenian Sarcophagi. The reliability of identities of the figures which mainly rise on the bases of their costumes, arms and equipments, is under question. It is also researched that the iconographic and historical contexts in which these figures took place. This study is discussed that the meaning of these figures on the sarcophagi, and because non-Ionian figures mostly take place in battle scenes it is also questioned that whether they picture the reflections of real events within the history of Ionia or not. As a result of this viewpoint, Skythian-Ionian, Thrakian-Persian and Thrakian-Skythian battles possibilities are analyzed beyond classical Kimmerian-Ionian and Persian-Ionian battles proposals. However, the inconsistencies between the cases make the possibility of the historical reality almost unlikely

Özet

Makalenin konusunu figürlü Klazomenai lahitleri üzerindeki, savaş ve mücadele sahnelerinde tasvir edilen, görünümleri ile Yunan hoplitlerinden ayrılan figürlerin etnik kimliği oluşturur. Figürleri kimliklendirme çabası, bu figürlerin giydiği giysiler ve taşıdıkları silah ve diğer ekipmanların yanında figürlerin içerisinde yer aldığı kompozisyon üzerinde temellenir. Birbirini tekrar eden ve geleneksel bir çizim anlayışına sahip olan Klazomenai lahitleri üzerinde Yunan olmayan bu figürlerin resmedilme sebepleri ikonografik ve tarihsel zemin üzerinde araştırılmıştır. Çalışma ayrıca Yunan olmayan figürlerin yer aldığı sahnelerin İonia’nın geçirdiği tarihi olayları yansıtan resimler olup olmayacağını tartışır. Bu doğrultuda daha önceki çalışmalarda öne sürülen Kimmer-İonia ve Pers-İonia savaş resimleri olasılıklılarına İskit-İonia, Pers-Thrakia ve İskit-Thrakia savaşlarının olasılıkları eklenmiştir. Ancak olasılıkların artmasının da gösterdiği üzere söz konusu tasvirlerin direkt tarihi resim oldukları kanısının desteklenemeyeceği anlaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEREN, S. M. H. (2015). Klazomenai Lahitleri Üzerinde Betimlenen Barbar Figürleri. Colloquium Anatolicum, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 14, 130–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/145749

References (13)

  1. Åkerström 1951 Architektonische Terrakottaplatten in Stockholm, Lund. Baughan, E. P. 2010 “Persian Riders in Lydia? The Painted Frieze of the Aktepe Tomb Kline”, Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Classical Archaeology, 22-26 September 2008, Rome. Bolettino di Archeologia on line 1: 24-36.
  2. Beazley, J. D. 1942
  3. Attic Red-Figure Vase-Painters, Oxford. 1947
  4. Etruscan Vase-Painting, Oxford. 1963 Attic Red-Figure Vase-Painters2, Oxford. Barringer, J. M. 2004 “Skythian Hunters on Attic Vases”, C. Marconi (ed.), Greek Vases: Images, Contexts and Controversies. Proceedings of the Conference. Sponsored by the Center for the Ancient Mediterranean at Columbia University, 23-24 March 2002. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, Volume XXV, Leiden-Boston: 13-25.
  5. Best, J. G. P. 1969 Thracian Peltasts and Their Influence on Greek Warfare, Groningen. Bingöl, O. 1997 Malerei und Mosaik der Antike in der Türkei, Mainz am Rhein. Boardman, J. 1970 Greek Gems and Finger Rings: Early Bronze Age to Late Classical, London. 2000 Persia and the West: An Archaeological Investigation of the Genesis of Achaemenid Art, London. 2002
  6. Kırmızı Figürlü Atina Vazoları, İstanbul (Çeviri: Gürkan Ergin). 2011 The Greeks Overseas: Their Early Colonies and Trade, New York. von Bothmer, D. 1957
  7. Amazons in Greek Art, Oxford. Bovio, J. M. 1938
  8. CVA Italia, Museo nazionale di Palermo, Italy 14, Roma. Buyskikh, S. B. 2007 “Contacts between Greeks and non-Greeks on the Lower Bug in the Sixth and Fifth Centuries BC.” D. Braundand – S. D. Kryzhitskiy (eds.), Classical Olbia and the Scythian World from the Sixth Century BC to the Second Century AD. Proceedings of the British Academy 142, Oxford:17-22.
  9. Cahn, H. A. 1973 “Dokimasia”, RA 6: 3-22.
  10. Casson, L. 1977 “The Thracians”, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 35. 2: 2-6.
  11. Coleman, J. E. 1997 “Ancient Greek Ethnocentrism”, J. Coleman – C. Walz, (eds.), Greeks and Barbarians: Essays on the Interactions between Greeks and Non-Greeks in Antiquity and the Consequences for Eurocentrism, Bethesda Maryland: 175-220.
  12. Cook, R. M. 1952 “Dogs in Battle”, Tobias Dohrn (ed.), Festschrift Andreas Rumpf. Zum 60. Geburstag dargebracht von Freuden und Schülern. Köln. Im Dezember 1950, Krefeld: 38-42. 1954 “Clazomenian and Related East Greek Black-Figure”, CVA BM 8, London: 14-28. 1965 “Old Smyrna: Ionic Black Figure and Other Sixth-Century Figured Wares”, BSA 60: 114-142. 1981
  13. Clazomenian Sarcophagi, Mainz. Cook, J. M. – Nichols, R. V. 1998 Old Smy