SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24

AN EVALUTAION OF A GROUP OF POTTERY FROM YENIBADEMLI HÖYÜK: A NEW LOCAL TRADITION IN ISLANDS

Yenibademli Höyük’te Bulunmuş Olan Bir Grup Çömleğin Değerlendirilmesi: Adalarda Yerel Bir Gelenek

Belgin AKSOY
Pages
51–63
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also worth to mention, that some of these peculiarities can be seen in Thessaly and East Macedonia. functioned as collective memory spaces, the selection and processing of food needed for these feasts, and also the storage of food depending on their seasonal availability or famine conditions played an important role in domestication of plants and animals as well as the transition to settled life for the first time ever

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Yenibademli Höyük, which is located on the island Gökçeada (Imbros) west of Gallipoli, is one of the sites enlightening the relations between north Aegean and west Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The investigations that took place since 1996 did not only uncover a small site showing close similarities to Troy, but also contributed to increase our knowledge on the nature of the Anatolia’s relations to the Aegean world together with the other Bronze Age sites Poliochni at Lemnos and Thermi at Lesbos.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also worth to mention, that some of these peculiarities can be seen in Thessaly and East Macedonia. functioned as collective memory spaces, the selection and processing of food needed for these feasts, and also the storage of food depending on their seasonal availability or famine conditions played an important role in domestication of plants and animals as well as the transition to settled life for the first time ever
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Yenibademli Höyük, which is located on the island Gökçeada (Imbros) west of Gallipoli, is one of the sites enlightening the relations between north Aegean and west Anatolia. The investigations that took place since 1996 did not only uncover a small site showing close similarities to Troy, but also contributed to increase our knowledge on the nature of the Anatolia’s relations to the Aegean world together with the other Bronze Age sites Poliochni at Lemnos and Thermi at Lesbos. In following a group of pottery from Yenibademli Höyük will be presented. These Examples show similarities to those from Troia one hand and Poliochni and Thermi on the other. But there are also some peculiarities, which might be considered as unique. It is also worth to mention, that some of these peculiarities can be seen in Thessaly and East Macedonia. functioned as collective memory spaces, the selection and processing of food needed for these feasts, and also the storage of food depending on their seasonal availability or famine conditions played an important role in domestication of plants and animals as well as the transition to settled life for the first time ever

Özet

Gelibolu Yarımadası açıklarındaki Gökçeada’da (İmbros) bulunan Yenibademli Höyük, Kuzey Ege ve BatıAnadolu arasındaki ilişkilere ışık tutan yerleşim yerlerinden birisidir. Şimdiye kadar burada yürütülençalışmalar, Troya ile önemli ölçüde benzerlik sergileyen küçük bir yerleşimi açığa çıkartmakla kalmamış,Anadolu’nun Ege Dünyası ile kurduğu ilişkiler ağının niteliği hakkında, Poliochni ve Thermi ile birliktefikir sahibi olmamızı da sağlamıştır. Aşağıda Yenibademli’de 1996’dan itibaren yürütülmekte olan kazılar sırasında ele geçen bir grup çömlek tanıtılacaktır. Söz konusu eserler bir taraftan Troia, diğer taraftandiğer iki ada yerleşimi olan Poliochni ve Thermi malzemesi ile paralellikler sergilemekle birlikte, şimdiyekadar bu bölgede karşımıza çıkmamış olan kimi form ve bezeme özellikleri ile de dikkat çeker. Bu kaplarınetüdünde dikkat çeken kimi tekil öğelerin benzerlerine Makedonya Bölgesi’nde ve Thesalia’da rastlanıyorolması, Kuzeybatı Anadolu’nun bu bölge ile ilişkisinin gelişimi açısından ilginç hususlara işaret etmeklebirlikte, bu doğrultuda yeni araştırmalara da ihtiyaç olduğunun altını çizmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSOY, B. (2022). AN EVALUTAION OF A GROUP OF POTTERY FROM YENIBADEMLI HÖYÜK: A NEW LOCAL TRADITION IN ISLANDS. Arkeoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 24, 51–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/448227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aslanıs 1985:
  2. I. Aslanis, Kastanas. Ausgrabungen in einem Siedlungshügel der Bronze- und Eisenzeit Makedoniens 1975-1979. Die frühbronzezeitlichen Funde und Befunde, Berlin. Bernabo-Brea 1964:
  3. L.P. Bernabo-Brea, Poliochni. Citta Preistorica Nell’isola di Lemnos. Vol. I, Roma. Blegen vd 1950:
  4. C. W. Blegen, J.L. Caskey, M. Rawson, J. Sperling, Troy, the first and second settlements. Vol. 1, 2, New Jersey. Chrıstmann 1996:
  5. E. Christmann, Die deutschen Ausgrabungen auf der Pevkakia-Magula in Thessalien II. Die Frühbronzezeit. Bonn. Efe 2006: T. Efe, 2006: “Anatolische Wurzeln – Troia und die frühe Bronzezeit im Westen Kleinasiens”, M.O. Korfmann (Ed.), Troia, Archäologie eines Siedlungshügels und seiner Landschaft, Mainz, 15-28. Efe 2007: T. Efe, “The Theories of the ‘Great Caravan Route’ between Cilicia and Troy the Early Bronze Age Period III in Inland Western Anatolia”, AnSt 57, 47-64. Eslıck 1992:
  6. C. Eslick, Elmalı-Karataş I. The Neolithic and Chalcolithic Periods: Bağbaşı and other sites. Bryn Mawr College Archaeological Monographs. French 1969:
  7. D. French, Anatolia and Aegean in the Third Millennium. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Cambridge. Heurtley 1939:
  8. W.A. Heurtley, Prehistoric Macedonia. An archaeological reconnaissance of Greek Macedonia (West of Struma) in the Neolithic, Bronze and Early Iron Age, Cambridge. Hüryılmaz 2003: H. Hüryılmaz, “2001 Yılı Yenibademli Kazı Sonuçları,” KST, 24.1, Ankara, 95-104. Hüryılmaz 2012: H. Hüryılmaz, “GökçeadaYenibademli Höyük 2010 Yılı Kazıları,” KST, 33.1, Malatya, 1-18. Hüryılmaz 2013: H. Hüryılmaz, “Gökçeada Yenibademli Höyük 2011 Yılı Kazıları”, KST, 34.1, Çorum, 169-186. Hüryılmaz 2014: H. Hüryılmaz, “Gökçeada Yenibademli Höyüğün Kültürel Sıradüzeninin Genel Özellikleri”, Y. Pazarkaya, B. Öztürk, Gökçeada Doğa ve Kültür Varlıkları, İstanbul. Hüryılmaz 2016: H. Hüryılmaz, “Yenibademli and Troy: Reflection of Troy I Culture in the Light of Archaeological Findings and Cultural Identity of Yenibademli,” E. Pernicka, S. Ünlüsoy, S.W.E. Blum (Eds.), Early Bronze Age Troy: Chronology, Cultural Development and Interregional Contacts, 147-155. Hüryılmaz ve Yalçıklı 2015:
  9. H. Hüryılmaz, D. Yalçıklı, “Gökçeada-Yenibademli Höyük 2013 Yılı Kazıları,” KST, 36.1, Gaziantep, 335-350. Kamil 1982:
  10. T. Kamil, Yortan Cemetery in the Early Bronze Age of Western Anatolia. BAR International Series 145, Oxford. Korfmann 2006: M. Korfmann, “Troia, Archäologie eines Siedlungshügels und seiner Landschaft”, M. Korfmann (Ed.), Troia, Archäo