Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Koroner arter hastası olan genç ve yaşlı hastaların risk faktörleri, klinik ve anjiyografi bulguları açısından karşılaştırılması

Comparison of traditional risk factors, natural history and angiographic findings between coronary heart disease patients with age <40 and ≥40 years old

Pages
124–127
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objective: In this study we aimed to examine the angiographic findings, traditional risk factors and natural history of Turkish patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study we aimed to examine the angiographic findings, traditional risk factors and natural history of Turkish patients
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: In this study we aimed to examine the angiographic findings, traditional risk factors and natural history of Turkish patients
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: In this study we aimed to examine the angiographic findings, traditional risk factors and natural history of Turkish patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study we aimed to examine the angiographic findings, traditional risk factors and natural history of Turkish patients

Özet

Comparison of traditional risk factors, natural history and angiographic findings between coronary heart disease patients with age

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖKMEN, Y., YILDIRIM, N., DOĞAN, M. S., ARAT, N., ÖZCAN, F. (2022). Koroner arter hastası olan genç ve yaşlı hastaların risk faktörleri, klinik ve anjiyografi bulguları açısından karşılaştırılması. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 124–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/437147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ridker MP, Genest J, Libby P. Risk factors for atherosclerotic disease. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, editors. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001. p. 1010 - 39
  2. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1144-7
  3. Weinberger I, Rotenberg Z, Fuchs J, Sagy A, Friedmann J, Agmon J. Myocardial infarction in young adults under 30 years: risk factors and clinical course. Clin Cardiol 1987; 10: 9-15
  4. Perski A, Olsson G, Landou C, de Faire U, Theorell T, Hamsten A. Minimum heart rate and coronary atherosclerosis: independent relations to global severity and rate of progression of angiographic lesions in men with myocardial infarction at a young age. Am Heart J 1992; 123: 609-16
  5. Chouhan L, Hajar HA, Pomposiello JC. Comparison of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in patients aged _____35 and >55 years. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 157-9
  6. Uhl GS, Farrell PW. Myocardial infarction in young adults: risk factors and natural history. Am Heart J 1983; 105: 548-53
  7. Gordon T, Castelli WP, Hjortland MC, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Predicting coronary heart disease in middle-aged and older persons: the Framingham study. JAMA 1977; 238: 497-9
  8. Stokes J, Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Cupples LA, D’Agostino RB. The relative importance of selected risk factors for various manifestations of cardiovascular disease among men and women from 35 to 64 years old: 30 years of follow-up in the Framingham study. Circulation 1987; 75 (Suppl 5): V-65-73
  9. Report of the Expert Committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1183-97
  10. National Cholesterol Education Program (U.S.). Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (adult treatment panel III): final report. Bethesda, Md: National Cholesterol Education Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2002. NIH publication; no. 02-5215
  11. Malmberg K, Bavenholm P, Hamsten A. Clinical and biochemical factors associated with prognosis after myocardial infarction at a young age. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 592-9
  12. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, Fye CL, Anderson SW, Elam MB, et al. Gemfibrozil for