SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Sound Quality by Acoustic Analysis After Bilateral Reinke’s Edema Surgery

Bilateral Reinke Ödemi Cerrahisi Sonrası Ses Kalitesinin Akustik Analiz ile Değerlendirilmesi

Nuray ENSARİ
Nevreste Didem SONBAY YILMAZ
Muhammet YILDIZ
Özer Erdem GÜR
Cansu AFYONCU
Pages
346–349
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Endolaryngeal surgery performed after the etiological factors are removed from there increases the sound quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, after the correction of the etiological factors diagnosed as Reinke edema, the sound made before and after surgery was evaluated in patients with surgical decision and discussed with the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients who were operated at our service with a diagnosis of bilateral reink edema between 2015-2019 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Endolaryngeal surgery performed after the etiological factors are removed from there increases the sound quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, after the correction of the etiological factors diagnosed as Reinke edema, the sound made before and after surgery was evaluated in patients with surgical decision and discussed with the literature. Methods: Patients who were operated at our service with a diagnosis of bilateral reink edema between 2015-2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The voice recordings of all patients were recorded acoustic and spectrographically 1 week before the operation and 1 month after the operation. In acoustic analysis, Mean basic frequency (Fo), mean intensity, percentage of jitter (%), percentage of shimmer (%) were measured. The values before and after the operation were compared statistically. Results: As a result of comparison of acoustic analysis findings before and after the operation, a significant difference was found in all parameters except Fo parameter. Conclusion: Reinke's edema; It is a benign polypoid degeneration with characteristic histology of the reinke cavity. Endolaryngeal surgery performed after the etiological factors are removed from there increases the sound quality.

Özet

Giriş:Bu çalışmada Reinke ödemi tanısı alan etyolojik faktörler düzeltildikten sonra cerrahi kararıverilen hastalarda cerrahi öncesi ve sonrası yapılan ses değerlendirilerek literatür eşliğindetartışıldı.Gereç ve Yöntemler:Servisimizde 2015-2019 yılları arasında bilateral reinke ödemi tanısı ile opere edilen hastalarretrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bütün hastaların operasyondan 1 hafta önce ve operasyondan1 ay sonra kontrollerinde ses kayıtları akustik ve spektrografik olarak kaydedildi. Akustikanalizde; ortalama temel frekans (Fo), ortalama şiddet, jitter yüzdesi (%), shimmer yüzdesi (%)parametreleri ölçüldü. Operasyon öncesi ve sonrası değerler istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası akustik analiz bulgularının karşılaştırılması sonucunda, Foparametresi hariç tüm parametrelerde anlamlı fark saptandı.Sonuç: Reinke ödemi; Reinke boşluğunun karakteristik histolojik ile iyi huylu polipoid dejenerasyonudur. Etyolojik faktörler oradan kaldırıldıktan sonra yapılan endolarengeal cerrahi seskalitesini oldukça yükseltir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ENSARİ, N., YILMAZ, N. D. S., YILDIZ, M., GÜR, Ö. E., AFYONCU, C. (2022). Evaluation of Sound Quality by Acoustic Analysis After Bilateral Reinke’s Edema Surgery. Akdeniz Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 346–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/434216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Tavaluc R, Tan-Geller M. Reinke's Edema. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019; 52(4):627-35. (PMID: 31101355
  2. Zeitels SM, Hillman RE, Bunting GW, Vaughn T. Reinke's edema: phonatory mechanisms and manage ment strategies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997; 106(7):533-43. (PMID: 9228851
  3. Khodeir MS, Hassan SM, El Shoubary AM, Saad MNA. Surgical and Nonsurgical Lines of Treatment of Reinke's Edema: A Systematic Literature Review. J Voice. 2019: 21.pii: S0892-1997(19)30344-3. (PMID: 31761692)
  4. Tsikoudas A, Kochillas X, Vernham G. Reinke’s oedema, hormones and hormone replacement therapy. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120(10):849–52. (PMID: 16716238
  5. Dursun G, Ozgursoy OB, Kemal O, Coruh I. One-year follow up results of combined use of CO2 laser and cold instrumentation for Reinke’s edema surgery in profes sional voice users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264(9):1027–32. (PMID: 17431653
  6. Woodson GE, Cannito M. Voice analysis. CW Cummings, JM Fredrickson, LA Harker, CJ Krause, MA Richardson, DE Schuller (Ed). Cummings Otolaryngolo gy—Head & Neck Surgery.3rd edition. Phidelphia: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1998.page 1876-1890 7. Sarıca S, Bilal N, Sağıroğlu S, Oğuzhan O, Altınışık M, Kılıç MA. Farklı Analiz Programları Kullanarak Sesin Frekans ve Perturbation Parametrelerinin Karşılaştırıl ması. KBB BBC Derg 2017;25 (2):13-20 8. Martins RH, Fabro AT, Domingues MA, Chi AP, Grego rio EA. Is Reinke’s edema a precancerous lesion? Histological and electron microscopic aspects. J Voice 2009;23(6):721–25. (PMID: 18619781
  7. Lim S, Sau P, Cooper L, McPhaden A, Mackenzie K. The incidence of premalignant and malignant disease in Reinke’s edema. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150(3):434–6. (PMID: 24436463
  8. Remacle M, Friedrich G, Dikkers FG, de Jong F. Phono surgery of the vocal folds: a classification proposal. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260:1–6. (PMID: 12520347)
  9. Honda K, Haji T, Maruyama H. Functional results of Reinke’s edema surgery using a microdebrider. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119(1):32–6. PMID: 20128184
  10. Nielsen VM, Hojslet PE, Karlsmose M. Surgical treatment of Reinke’s oedema (Long-term results). J Laryngol Otol 1986;100(02):187–90.