SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Annals of Medical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Clinical trial to evaluate the outcome of canal wall up and canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy

Işıl ÇAKMAK KARAER
Nuray ENSARİ
Pages
466–470
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there was no statistically significant difference identified at 4 kHz.Conclusion: Regardless to the surgical technique, statistically significant levels of hearing gain were provided at 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 kHz;however, there was no hearing gain at 4 kHz after the surgical procedure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing outcomes of chronic suppurative otitis media surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chronic suppurativeotitis media (CSOM) surgery composed of two procedure; canal wall up mastoidectomy (CWU) and canal wall down mastoidectomy(CWD).Material and Methods:The study included 29 patients with CSOM diagnosis and patients a mean age of 37.02 ± 2.4 years (y).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there was no statistically significant difference identified at 4 kHz.Conclusion: Regardless to the surgical technique, statistically significant levels of hearing gain were provided at 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 kHz;however, there was no hearing gain at 4 kHz after the surgical procedure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing outcomes of chronic suppurative otitis media surgery. Chronic suppurativeotitis media (CSOM) surgery composed of two procedure; canal wall up mastoidectomy (CWU) and canal wall down mastoidectomy(CWD).Material and Methods:The study included 29 patients with CSOM diagnosis and patients a mean age of 37.02 ± 2.4 years (y). Thedemographic features (age, gender), clinical features and intraoperative findings of the patients were recorded. Patients’ hearing wasevaluated with pure tone audiometry (PTA) at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz and pre-postoperative air bone gap (ABG) difference. Pre- andpost-operative air-bone gap (ABG) at 12 months after ossiculoplasty. There were 8 patients who underwent CWD and 21 patientswho underwent CWU.Results: TWhen preoperative and postoperative ABG for the patients are compared, there were statistically significant differencesidentified at 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 kHz. However, there was no statistically significant difference identified at 4 kHz.Conclusion: Regardless to the surgical technique, statistically significant levels of hearing gain were provided at 0.5, 1, 2 and 8 kHz;however, there was no hearing gain at 4 kHz after the surgical procedure.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAER, I. Ç., ENSARİ, N. (2022). Clinical trial to evaluate the outcome of canal wall up and canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 466–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/446191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Cheng-Chuan C, Mu-Kuan C. Canal-wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for advanced cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 29:270
  2. Chamoli P, Singh CV, Radia S et al. Functional and anatomical outcome of inside out technique for cholesteatoma surgery. American J Otolaryngol 2018; 39:423-30
  3. Gaillardin L, Lescanne E, Morinière S et al. Residual cholesteatoma: prevalence and location. Follow-up strategy in adults. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2012;129:136-40
  4. Tomlin J, Chang D, McCutcheon B et al. Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a metaanalysis. Audiol Neurootol 2013;18:135-42
  5. Kerckhoffs KG, Kommer MB, van Strien, TH et al. The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up or canal wall down technique in adults. Laryngoscope 2016;126:980-7
  6. Segalla DK, Nakao LH, Anjos MF et al. Resultados cirúrgicos e audiológicos pós mastoidectomia em um serviço de Residência Médica. Acta Otorrinolaringol 2008;26:178-81
  7. Vartiainen E, Nuutinen J. Long-term hearing results of one-stage tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1992;249: 329-31
  8. Veldman JE, Braunius WW. Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: a learning experience: report on 389 cases with a long-term follow-up. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107: 486-491
  9. Cruz LMO, Kasse CA, Leonhart FD. Efficacy of surgical treatment of chronic otitis media. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:263-6
  10. Cruz LMO, Kasse CA, Leonhart FD. Eficácia do tratamento cirurgico da otite média crônica colesteatomatosa. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 67:142-6
  11. Cook JA, Krishnan S, Fagan PA. Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngo 1996;105: 379-83
  12. Cheng-Chuan C, & Mu-Kuan, C. Canal-wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for advanced cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 29:270
  13. Stankovic M. Follow-up of cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty. ORL 2007;69: 299-305
  14. Roden D, Honrubia, VF, Wiet R. Outcome of residual cholesteatoma and hearing in mastoid surgery. J Otolaryngol 1996; 25:178-81
  15. Nyrop M, Bonding P. Extensive cholesteatoma: longterm results of three surgical techniques. The J Laryngology & Otology 1997;111:521-6. 16. de Azevedo AF, de Castro Soares AB, Garchet, HQC, de Sousa, NJA. Tympanomastoidectomy: Comparison between canal wall-down and canal wall-up techniques in surgery for chronic otitis media. Int Arch Otorhinolary