Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

ENDÜSTRİYEL ÇEVİK İŞLETME İÇİN DENGELENMİŞ BAŞARI GÖSTERGELERİ

Pages
38–50
Publication Date
2022-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With future studies, the consistency of the framework can be measured by comparing businesses that apply and do not apply these criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Starting with the contingency approach and extending to the theories of complexity, chaos and complexity, dynamic competition elements embodying the enterprises with the concepts of globalization and industry 4.0, threaten the businesses more than ever with their destructive innovation approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today's industrial businesses have to gain the concept of agility as a management set adapted to their structure, process and strategies, regardless of the sectors in which they operate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With future studies, the consistency of the framework can be measured by comparing businesses that apply and do not apply these criteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:örgütsel çeviklik · performans · dengeli başarı göstergesi

Abstract

Starting with the contingency approach and extending to the theories of complexity, chaos and complexity, dynamic competition elements embodying the enterprises with the concepts of globalization and industry 4.0, threaten the businesses more than ever with their destructive innovation approaches. The concept of agility emerged primarily in the fields of production and software in the nineties. Today's industrial businesses have to gain the concept of agility as a management set adapted to their structure, process and strategies, regardless of the sectors in which they operate. In the study, the concept of organizational agility was comprehensively examined in the context of enablers and necessary capabilities, and is summarized as a management tool that can be added to the existing strategy criteria of businesses within the framework of Balanced Scorecard developed by Kaplan and Norton. With future studies, the consistency of the framework can be measured by comparing businesses that apply and do not apply these criteria.

Özet

Durumsallık yaklaşımı ile başlayıp, kompleksite, kaos ve karmaşıklık kuramlarına uzanan, küreselleşme ve Endüstri 4.0 kavramları ile işletmelerde vücut bulan dinamik rekabet unsurları, yıkıcı inovasyon yaklaşımları ile birlikte işletmeleri hiç olmadığı kadar tehdit etmektedir. Yoğunlukla üretim ve yazılım alanlarında doksanlı yıllarda ortaya çıkan çeviklik kavramının, günümüzde endüstriyel işletmelerin faaliyet gösterdikleri sektörlerden bağımsız olarak, yapı, süreç ve stratejilerine göre uyarlanması ve kazanılması zorunlu olan bir yetenek hâline gelmiştir. Çalışmada örgütsel çeviklik kavramı, mümkün kılan destekleyiciler ve gerekli olan yetenekler bağlamında kapsamlı olarak incelenmiştir. Kaplan & Norton tarafından geliştirilmiş olan Dengeli Başarı Göstergesi çerçevesinde işletmelerin mevcut strateji ölçütlerine boyutsal olarak ilave edilebilecek bir yönetim aracı olarak özetlenmeye çalışılmıştır. İleride yapılabilecek çalışmalarla bu ölçütleri uygulayan ve uygulamayan işletmeler mukayese edilerek, çerçevenin tutarlılığı ölçülebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKDİN, A. E. (2022). ENDÜSTRİYEL ÇEVİK İŞLETME İÇİN DENGELENMİŞ BAŞARI GÖSTERGELERİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 38–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/396991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ali, I. (2016). Doing the organizational tango: Symbiotic relationship between formal and informal organizational structures for an agile organization. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 11, 55-72.
  2. Ambrose, C. & Morello, D. (2004). Designing the Agile Organization: Design Principles and Practices, Gartner. Attaran, M. (2017). The Rise of 3-D Printing: The Advantages of Additive Manufacturing Over Traditional Manufacturing, Business Horizons, 60(5), 677-688.
  3. Azuma, R. T. (1997).
  4. A Survey of Augmented Reality, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  5. Bahrami, M., Kiani, M., Montazeralfaraj, R., Zadeh, H., Zadeh, M. (2016). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning in the Relationship of Organizational Intelligence and Organizational Agility. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 7, 10.1016/j.phrp.2016.04.007. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. van, Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., vd. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Available from http://agilemanifesto.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Şubat 2019).
  6. Burns, T. & Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Oxford University Press,
  7. Oxford Cai, Z., Liu, H., Huang, Q. & Liang, L. (2019). Developing organizational agility in product innovation: the roles of IT capability, KM capability, and innovative climate, R&D mangement, 49 (4), 421-438.
  8. Cameron, K.S. & Quinn, R.E. 1999. Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework, 1st ed.; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA. Carvalho, A. M., Sampaio, P., Rebentisch E. &Saraiva, P. (2017). Quality, excellence and culture in the pursuit of organizational agility, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 1714-1718.
  9. Chai, N. (2009). Sustainability performance evaluation system in government: a balanced scorecard approach towards sustainable development, Newyork, Springer. Conboy, K. & Fitzgerald, B. (2004). Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: A study of agility in different disciplines. WISER 2004 - ACM Workshop on Interdisciplinary Software Engineering Research. 37-44. 10.1145/1029997.1030005. De Meuse, K. (2017). Learning agility: Its evolution as a psychological construct and its empirical relationship to leader success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69, 267-295.
  10. Demigha, S., Kharabsheh, R. (2019). Agile and Organizational Learning. Proceedings o