Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2020 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

Coopetition: A Content Analysis Study within the Scope of Empirical Articles Published Between 2010-2020

Ortaklaşa Rekabet: 2010-2020 Yılları Arasında Yayınlanmış Ampirik Makaleler Kapsamında Bir İçerik Analizi Çalışması

Pages
2071–2092
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of the findings, coopetition can generally be considered as a phenomenon that includes the structural and behavioral dimensions as well as being a strategic choice with a competitive dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of coopetition, which is frequently emphasized in the literature as a paradoxical phenomenon, has continued to attract the attention of the academic world and researchers for many years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a content analysis covering the empirical articles published in foreign literature between 2010 and 2020 in the context of management and organization for the concept of coopetition was conducted systematically and classified according to their basic context.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of the findings, coopetition can generally be considered as a phenomenon that includes the structural and behavioral dimensions as well as being a strategic choice with a competitive dimension.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The concept of coopetition, which is frequently emphasized in the literature as a paradoxical phenomenon, has continued to attract the attention of the academic world and researchers for many years. With this study, it is aimed to develop a broader understanding of coopetition and to shed light on future studies. In this study, a content analysis covering the empirical articles published in foreign literature between 2010 and 2020 in the context of management and organization for the concept of coopetition was conducted systematically and classified according to their basic context. The empirical studies reviewed show that firms' competitiveness is not limited to certain sectors. The findings also reveal that coopetition has some difficulties in practice (such as redefining organizational boundaries, establishing a trust relationship and coordination of coopetition) and contradictions (such as cooperation and information sharing with competitors). In light of the findings, coopetition can generally be considered as a phenomenon that includes the structural and behavioral dimensions as well as being a strategic choice with a competitive dimension.

Özet

Literatürde sıklıkla paradoksal bir olgu olduğu vurgulanan ortaklaşa rekabet kavramı uzun yıllardırakademik dünyanın ve araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmeye devam etmektedir. Bu çalışma ile ortaklaşarekabet ile ilgili daha geniş bir anlayış geliştirilmesi ve gelecekteki çalışmalara ışık tutulmasıamaçlanmaktadır. Bu çalışma çerçevesinde ortaklaşa rekabet kavramına dönük olarak yönetim veorganizasyon bağlamında, 2010-2020 yılları arasında yabancı literatürde yayınlanmış ampirik makalelerikapsayan bir içerik analizi yapılarak çalışmalar sistematik olarak incelenmiş ve temel bağlamlarına göresınıflandırılmışlardır. İncelenen ampirik çalışmalar firmaların ortaklaşa rekabet etmesinin belirlisektörlerle sınırlı olmadığını göstermektedir. Bulgular ayrıca ortaklaşa rekabetin uygulamada kendi içindebir takım güçlükler (örgüt sınırlarının yeniden belirlenmesi, güven ilişkisi kurma ve ortaklaşa rekabetinkoordinasyonu gibi) ve çelişkiler (rakiplerle işbirliği ve bilgi paylaşımı gibi) barındırdığını ortayakoymaktadır. Bulgular ışığında ortaklaşa rekabet genel olarak, rekabet boyutu olan stratejik bir terciholmasının yanı sıra yapısal ve davranışsal boyutları da kapsayan bir olgu olarak değerlendirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEREHA, A. (2020). Coopetition: A Content Analysis Study within the Scope of Empirical Articles Published Between 2010-2020. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 2071–2092. https://ajindex.com/articles/357479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akdoğan, A. A., & Cingöz, A. (2012). “An empirical study on determining the attitudes of small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) related to coopetition”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 252-258.
  2. Akpinar, M., & Vincze, Z. (2016). “The dynamics of coopetition: A stakeholder view of the German automotive industry”, Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 53-63.
  3. Bacon, E., Williams, M. D., & Davies, G. (2019). “Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations”, Journal of Business Research. 115, 307-316.
  4. Bendig, D., Enke, S., Thieme, N., & Brettel, M. (2018). “Performance implications of crossfunctional coopetition in new product development: the mediating role of organizational learning”, Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 137-153.
  5. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (1999). “Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178- 194. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). “Coopetition” in business Networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously”, Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-426.
  6. Bengtsson, M., Hinttu, S., & Kock, S. (2003, September). “Relationships of cooperation and competition between competitors”, In 19th Annual IMP Conference, Lugano (pp. 1-11).
  7. Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T., & Vanyushyn, V. (2016). “The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability”, Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 19- 30. Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2013). “Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The doubleedged sword of coopetition”, Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060-2070.
  8. Bouncken, R. B., Clauß, T., & Fredrich, V. (2016). “Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: Singular or plural governance?”, Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 77-90.
  9. Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2016). “Learning in coopetition: Alliance orientation, network size, and firm types”, Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1753-1758.
  10. Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Ritala, P., & Kraus, S. (2018). “Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation”, British Journal of Management, 29(3), 391-410.
  11. Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2020). “Configurations of firm-level value capture in coopetition”, Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101869. Chai, L., Li, J., Tangpong, C., & Clauss, T. (2019). “The interplays of coopetition, conflicts, trus