SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2018 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR IN THE SPIRAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE: THE CASE OF KARAMAN PROVINCE

ÖRGÜTSEL SESSİZLİK SARMALINDA ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK: KARAMAN İLİ ÖRNEĞİ

SEVCAN GÜLEÇ SOLAK
Merve EROK
Pages
1337–1356
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Only gender and duration of study were found to be effective on OCB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the OCB and organizational silence and to determine the effects of the sub-dimensions of organizational silence on the OCD.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For thisreason, a field study was conducted on the public employees of Karaman province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Only gender and duration of study were found to be effective on OCB.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the OCB and organizational silence and to determine the effects of the sub-dimensions of organizational silence on the OCD. For thisreason, a field study was conducted on the public employees of Karaman province. As a result of the study, a positive relationship was found between the OCB and organizational silence. There was also no difference between demographic characteristics such as marital status, trade union membership, status, age, education and income status and the dependent variable. Only gender and duration of study were found to be effective on OCB.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ÖVD ve örgütsel sessizlik arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve örgütsel sessizliğin alt boyutlarının ÖVD üzerindeki etkilerini tespit etmektir. Bu sebeple Karaman ili kamu çalışanları üzerinde bir alan araştırması yapılmıştır. Yapılan araştırma neticesinde, ÖVD ve örgütsel sessizlik arasında pozitif yönlü (r=0,156) bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Ayrıca medeni durum, sendika üyeliği, statü, yaş, eğitim ve gelir durumu gibi demografik özellikler ile bağımlı değişken olan ÖVD arasında bir farklılık bulunamamış yalnızca cinsiyet ve çalışma süresinin ÖVD üzerinde etkili olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLAK, S. G., EROK, M. (2018). ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR IN THE SPIRAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE: THE CASE OF KARAMAN PROVINCE. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 1337–1356. https://ajindex.com/articles/320360

References (10)

  1. Algın, İlknur (2014),“Üniversitelerde Örgütsel Sessizlik”,Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  2. Alioğulları, Duygu Zişan (2012), “Örgütsel Sessizlik ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki Bir Uygulama”,Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Barksdale, Kevin; WernerJon, M. (2001),“Managerial Ratings Of In‐Role Behaviors, Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, and Overall Performance: Testing Different Models Of Their Relationship”, Journal of Business Research, No:51, p.p. 145‐155. Bateman, Thomas; Organ, Denis (1983),“Job Satisfaction and The Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee Citizenship”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No: 4,s. 587-595.
  3. Bowen, Frances., Blackmon Kate (2003),“Spirals of silence: The Dynamic Effects of Diversity On Organizational Voice”, Journal Of Management Studies, Vol. 40, No: 6,p.p. 1393-1417.
  4. Brief, Arthur; Motowidlo, Stephan, j. (1986),“Pro-Social Organizational Behaviors”,Academy of Management Review, No:11, s.710-725.
  5. Brinsfield, Chad, T. (2009),“Employee Silence: Investıgatıon of Dımensıonalıty, Development of Measures and Examinatıon of Related Factors Dissertion”,Ohio State University, USA. Cohen, Aaron;Vigoda, Eran (2000), “Do Good Citizens Make Good Organizational Citizens? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between General Citizenship and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Israel”,Administration & Society,Vol. 32 No: 5,p.p. 596-624. Çakıcı,Ayşehan (2007), “Örgütlerde Sessizlik: Sessizliğin Teorik Temelleri ve Dinamikleri”Çanakkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C: 16, S: 1,p.p. 145- 162. Erkılıç, Eren; Güllüce, Ali (2017),”Investigation of Organizational CitizenshipBehavior of Hotel Employees by StructuralEquation Model”iBusiness,No:9,p.p.31-47.
  6. Erigüç, Gülsün; Ergin, Gülpembe. (2003). “Personel Yönetiminden İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimine Geçerken İş Analizi: Kamu Hastaneleri Personel Bölümlerinde Bir Uygulama”Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, C: 6, S:1, s: 116-134.
  7. Eryılmaz, Bilal (2016), Kamu Yönetimi Düşünceler-Yapılar- Fonksiyonlar- Politikalar. Umuttepe Yayınları, 9. Baskı,
  8. İstanbul.
  9. Gadot, Vigoda Eran (2006),“Compulsory Citizenship Behavior: TheorizingSome Dark Sides of the Good Soldier Syndrome in Organizations”,Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,Vol.36, No:1, p.p.77-93.
  10. Gambarotto, Francesca; Cammozzo, Alberto (2010), “Dreams of Silence: Employee Voice and Innovation in a Public Sector Community of