SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2019 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Counterproductive Work Behaviours: The Mediating Role Of Organizational Commitment

Etik Liderlik Ve Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı İlişkisi: Örgütsel Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü

Alptekin SÖKMEN
Gökhan KENEK
Ezgi UĞRAŞ
Pages
1568–1582
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another result of the study is organitaional commitment has a mediating effect on the relationhip between ethical leadership and counterproductive work behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the mediator role of organizational commitment in the relationship between ethical leadership and counterproductive work behaviour.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The datas of this study were obtained with survey method from 253 employees working in different departments in a firm that shows activity in the construction sector in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another result of the study is organitaional commitment has a mediating effect on the relationhip between ethical leadership and counterproductive work behaviors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the mediator role of organizational commitment in the relationship between ethical leadership and counterproductive work behaviour. The datas of this study were obtained with survey method from 253 employees working in different departments in a firm that shows activity in the construction sector in Turkey. Correlation and regression analysis were applied by SPSS 23 programme. The results reveal that ethical leadership has a positive relationship with organitaional commitment; and negatif relationship with counterproductive work behaviour. Also, there is a negatif relationship between organizational commitment and counter-prductive work behaviour. Another result of the study is organitaional commitment has a mediating effect on the relationhip between ethical leadership and counterproductive work behaviors.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı etik liderlik ile üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel bağlılığın aracılık etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma, Türkiye genelinde inşaat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren özel bir şirketin 253 çalışanının katılımıyla tamamlanmıştır. Araştırma verileri anket yöntemi ile toplanmıştır ve verilere uygun olarak SPSS 23 programı aracılığıyla korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre; etik liderlik örgütsel bağlılık ile pozitif yönlü, üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı ile ise negatif yönlü anlamlı ilişkilere sahiptir. Ayrıca, örgütsel bağlılık ve üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen diğer bir sonuca göre ise örgütsel bağlılık, etik liderlik ile üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı arasında aracılık etkisine sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖKMEN, A., KENEK, G., UĞRAŞ, E. (2019). The Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Counterproductive Work Behaviours: The Mediating Role Of Organizational Commitment. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 1568–1582. https://ajindex.com/articles/320137

References (9)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299).
  2. Academic Press.
  3. Allen, N. J., ve Meyer, J. P. (1990). The Measurement And Antecedents Of Affective, Continuance And Normative Commitment To The Organization. Journal Of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
  4. Ambrose, M., Seabright, M. A. ve Schminke, M. (2002). “Sabotage in the workplace: The Role of Organizational Injustice”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89: 947-965
  5. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Bass, B. M., ve Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster. Beauregard, T.A. (2014). Fairness Perceptions of Work-Lıt ifeBalance Initiatives: Effects on Counterproductive Work Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 1-18.
  6. Becker, H S (1960) Notes on the concept of commitment American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32- 42 Berghofer, D. ve Schwartz G., (2008). The Ethical Leadership Scales (Ethical Competence Scale, Ethical Leadership Scale, Ethical Organization Scale), USE: Trafford Publishing. Brown, M. E. ve Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595-616.
  7. Buchanan, B. (1974), Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization Of Managers In Work Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly,19(4), 533-546.
  8. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. Çelik, V. (2000). Eğitimsel Liderlik‛, Pegem A. Yayıncılık, Ankara, 288. Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 90(6), 1241. Demirtas, O., ve Akdogan, A. A. (2015). The effect of ethical leadership behavior on ethical climate, turnover intention, and affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 59-67.
  9. Ejimabo, N. O. (2015). An Approach To Understanding Leadership Decision Making İn Organization. European Scientific Journal, Esj, 11(11). Etzioni, A. (1965). Organizational control structure. Handbook of organizations, 650, 677. Gill, H., Meyer, J. P., Lee, K., Shin, K. H., ve Yoon, C. Y. (2011). Affective and continuance commitment and their relatio