Journals / Kent Akademisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Physical Carrying Capacity of Erzincan Girlevik Waterfall and Its Vicinity

Erzincan Girlevik Şelalesi ve Yakın Çevresinin Fiziksel Taşıma Kapasitesinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
22–36
Publication Date
2020-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the data obtained, proposals were made to ensure the sustainability of the area and to contribute to regional and Country tourism in accordance with the conservation - use principle

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With industrialization, individuals began to live their lives in ecosystems that deteriorated more and more.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The increase in the need for recreational areas encourages planners to use areas with natural richness that are a resource for outdoor recreation.Girlevik waterfall located in Çağlayan District, Erzincan province, is one of the important recreational areas of our country in terms of landscape or natural landscape beauty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the data obtained, proposals were made to ensure the sustainability of the area and to contribute to regional and Country tourism in accordance with the conservation - use principle
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erzincan · Fiziksel Kapasite · Erzincan

Abstract

With industrialization, individuals began to live their lives in ecosystems that deteriorated more and more. These developments include people resting in their leisure time, having fun, going on holiday, etc. it has made his wishes more dominant. The increase in the need for recreational areas encourages planners to use areas with natural richness that are a resource for outdoor recreation.Girlevik waterfall located in Çağlayan District, Erzincan province, is one of the important recreational areas of our country in terms of landscape or natural landscape beauty. While efforts to meet the demands of recreation continue, the intensive use of the exposed area is causing serious damage to the natural resource values.Within the scope of the research, the present situation of Erzincan Girlevik waterfall was determined and then the physical carrying capacity of the area was determined. When carrying capacity calculations were examined, the physical carrying capacity of the area was determined to be 994 persons per day. According to this data, the area is exposed to use above its physical carrying capacity. According to the data obtained, proposals were made to ensure the sustainability of the area and to contribute to regional and Country tourism in accordance with the conservation - use principle

Özet

Sanayileşme ile birlikte bireyler yaşamlarını, gün geçtikçe daha fazla bozulan ekosistemlerde sürdürmeye başlamıştır. Bu gelişmeler insanların boş zamanlarda dinlenme, eğlenme, tatile çıkma vb. isteklerini daha baskın hale getirmiştir. Rekreasyonel alanlara ihtiyacın artışı planlamacıları dış mekân rekreasyonuna kaynak oluşturan, doğal zenginliklere sahip alanları kullanmaya teşvik etmektedir. Erzincan İli, Çağlayan Beldesi’nde bulunan Girlevik Şelalesi’de, ülkemizin manzara veya doğal peyzaj güzelliği bakımından önemli rekreasyonel alanlarından birisidir. Rekreasyon taleplerini karşılamaya yönelik çalışmalar devam ederken, maruz kalınan yoğun kullanım alanın doğal kaynak değerleri üzerinde ciddi derecede tahribata neden olmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında öncelikle Erzincan Girlevik Şelalesinin mevcut durumu ortaya konulmuş, daha sonra alanın fiziksel taşıma kapasitesi tespit edilmiştir. Taşıma kapasitesi hesapları incelendiğinde, alanın fiziksel taşıma kapasitesi gün içerisinde 994 kişi olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu verilere göre alan fiziksel taşıma kapasitelerinin üzerinde kullanıma maruz kalmaktadır. Elde edilen verilere göre alanın sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanabilmesi ve koruma - kullanma prensibine uygun bir şekilde bölge ve ülke turizmine katkı sağlaması için öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANER, A. M., DEMİR, M. (2020). Determination of Physical Carrying Capacity of Erzincan Girlevik Waterfall and Its Vicinity. Kent Akademisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 22–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/235509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akten, S., Gül, A., Akten, M., 2009. Korunan Doğal Alanların Katılımcı Yönetim Planında Ziyaretçi Etki Yönetimi Yaklaşımı Modeli, International Davraz Congress on Social and Economic Issues Shaping The World's Future: New Global Isparta Arnberger, A., Brandenburg, C., 2007. Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environ. Manage.;40:34-45.
  2. Brush, S., 1975. The concept of carrying capacity for systems of shifting cultivation. American Anthropologist 77: 799-811.
  3. Cahill, K.L., J.L. Marion, ve S.R. Lawson, 2007. Enhancing the interpretation of stated choice tradeoff analysis through the application of a verbal protocol assessment. Journal of Leisure Research;Second Quarter.39, 2. Clarke, A.L., 2002. Assessing the carrying capacity of floridakeys. Population and Environment, 23/4, 405-418.
  4. Grieser, K.A., 2005. Visitor perceptions of crowding, coping and social carrying capacity: an exploratory study in the mohonk preserve. Master Thesis. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, New York Göktuğ, T.H., Yıldız, N.D., ve Demir, M., 2011. Carrying capacity assessment of Tortum Waterfall, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22(12): 37833791. Göktuğ, T.H., Yıldız, N.D., Demir, M., ve Bulut, Y., 2013. Taşıma Kapasitesi Kuramının Milli Parklarda Oluşum - Gelişim ve Modellenme Süreci. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 44 (2): 195-206.
  5. Itami, RM (2002). Estimating Capacities for Pedestrian Walkways and Viewing Platforms. An Report to Parks Victoria Report.pp 20 Manning, R.E., and Lime, D.W., 2001. Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: Avisual approach to setting standards of quality. Journal Leisure Sciences An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18 (1), 125-139.
  6. Manning, R., ve Lawson, S., 2002. Carrying capacity as “Informed Judgment”: The Values of Science and The Science of Values. Environmental Management, 30, 157-168
  7. McCool, S.F. ve Lime, D.W., 2001. Tourism Carrying Capacity: Tempting Fantasy or Useful Reality? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 9 (5), 372–88.
  8. Moore, S.A., and Polley, A., 2007. Defining Indicators and Standards for Tourism Impacts in Protected Areas: Cape Range National Park, Australia. Environmental Management, 39 (3), 291-300.
  9. Muraleetharan, T., Adachi, T., Uchida, K., Hagiwara, T., and Kagaya, S. (2004). A Study on Evaluation of Pedestrian Level of Service Along Sidewalks And At, 28-45.
  10. Needham, M.D., and Rollins, R.B., 2005. Interes