✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psychological contracts. collective contracts. individual contracts
Abstract
the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations. Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
🔖
Cite This Article
BİLGİN, L. (2007). Psikolojik Sözleşmelerin Oluşumu, Gelişimi ve İhlalinde Toplu ve Bireysel Sözleşmelerin Rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/230739