✨
Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)
Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Psychological contracts. collective contracts. individual contracts
Abstract
the promises and obligations between the parties. the union going between, increases the probability of psychological contract violation by hindering the mutuality in perceiving the promises and obligations. Yet, as idiosyncratic deals are not permitted in collective contraclS. organizational justice (equality-based distributive justice) perceptions may be higher in workplaces where employment relationship is
Anahtar kelimeler
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
BİLGİN, L. (2007). Psikolojik Sözleşmelerin Oluşumu, Gelişimi ve İhlalinde Toplu ve Bireysel Sözleşmelerin Rolü. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/230739