SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

Emergence of Communication Systems in Collaborative and Joint Action

Ortak ve İşbirliğine Dayalı Eylem Bağlamında İletişim Sistemlerinin Gelişimi

Murat ULUBAY
Pages
785–800
Publication Date
2023-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysis shows, in addition to several quantitative parameters, trends of diminishing use ratio of directive speech acts and increasing use ratio of assertive speech acts had been observed which are claimed to be characteristics of development of a mature and effective communication system and cognitive mechanisms of joint action.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Communication is a focal point in studies of joint action, where collective cognitive activity required (Sebanz and Knoblich, 2006).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a virtual experimental environment was utilized where participants’ communication was restricted to text messaging interface with a limited set of letters and symbols.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysis shows, in addition to several quantitative parameters, trends of diminishing use ratio of directive speech acts and increasing use ratio of assertive speech acts had been observed which are claimed to be characteristics of development of a mature and effective communication system and cognitive mechanisms of joint action.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ortak-eylem · kolektif zeka · söz-eylem

Abstract

Communication is a focal point in studies of joint action, where collective cognitive activity required (Sebanz and Knoblich, 2006). In this study, a virtual experimental environment was utilized where participants’ communication was restricted to text messaging interface with a limited set of letters and symbols. In eight experimental sessions, similar but different joint action tasks were given; each couple improved their joint action skills and developed their own private communication systems. Analysis shows, in addition to several quantitative parameters, trends of diminishing use ratio of directive speech acts and increasing use ratio of assertive speech acts had been observed which are claimed to be characteristics of development of a mature and effective communication system and cognitive mechanisms of joint action.

Özet

İletişim sistemleri, kolektif bilişsel faaliyetin gerektiği ortak-eylem alanının önemli bir unsuru olmuştur. (Sebanz and Knoblich, 2006). Çalışmada sanal bir deneysel ortamda katılımcı çiftlerin iletişim imkanları metin tabanlı bir arayüzde çok kısıtlı sayıda harf ve sembole sınırlanarak, sekiz deney oturumunun her birinde benzer ama farklı ortak eylem görevleri verilmiştir. Katılımcılar deneyler ilerledikçe ortak eylem kapasitelerini geliştirmiş ve her çift kendine özel bir iletişim sistemi geliştirmiştir. Yapılan analizlerde deneyler ilerledikçe, birçok niceliksel parametrelerle ilgili olan trendlerle beraber, Yönlendirici ve Saptayıcı-Betimleyici söz-eylemleri kullanım oranlarında sırasıyla azalan ve artan trendler saptanmıştır. Bu durumun olgunlaşmış işbirliği kapasitesini sağlayan bilişsel psikolojik mekanizmaların ve etkin iletişim sistemlerinin gelişiminin göstergesi olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUBAY, M. (2023). Emergence of Communication Systems in Collaborative and Joint Action. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 785–800. https://ajindex.com/articles/1020803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Appling, D.S., Briscoe, E.J., Hayes, H & Mappus, R.L. (2013). Towards Automated Personality Identification Using Speech Acts. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Axelrod, R. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.
  2. Bach, K. (2005). Speech Acts. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/spchacts.html
  3. Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., & Arnau, J. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29.4, 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
  4. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. In Analysis (Vol. 58, Issue 1, pp. 7–19). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  5. Clarks, H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
  6. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29, 737-767.
  7. Galantucci, B. (2005). An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems. In Cognitive Science (Vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 737–767). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1551670
  8. Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint Action: Current Perspectives. In Topics in Cognitive Science (Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 255–259). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756 8765.2009.01017.x Gerard, S., & Pickering, M. (2004). Why is Conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 8 Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. (P. Cole, & J. Morgan, Eds.) Syntax and semantics: Speech Acts, 3, 41-58.
  9. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
  10. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press.
  11. Hutchins, E., & Johnson, J. (2009). Modelling the Emergence of Language as an Embodied Collective Cognitive Activity. Topics inn Cognitive Science, 523-544.
  12. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
  13. Nolfi, S. (2005). Emergence of communication in embodied agents: co-adapting communicative behaviours. Connection Science, 231 - 248. Origgi, G., & Sperberger, D. (2000). Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In P. Carruthers, & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the Human Mind: Language, Modularity and Social Cognition (pp. 140-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Qadir, A., & Riloff, E. (2011). Classifying Sentences as Speech Acts in Message