SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

Hasargörebilirlik analizlerinde yer hareketi veri setine ve şiddet ölçüsüne bağlı epistemik belirsizliğin değerlendirilmesi

Özkan KALE
Pages
2125–2140
Publication Date
2019-06-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it can be concluded that the most influential parameter on the analysis results is intensity measure and its effective selection can considerably decrease the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main components of fragility analysis of structures can be listed as compilation of ground motion dataset, structural analysis and selection of ground motion intensity measures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, epistemic uncertainty with respect to the selection of the ground motion dataset and intensity measure is evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it can be concluded that the most influential parameter on the analysis results is intensity measure and its effective selection can considerably decrease the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hasargörebilirlik analizi · yer hareketi veri seti · şiddet ölçüsü

Abstract

The main components of fragility analysis of structures can be listed as compilation of ground motion dataset, structural analysis and selection of ground motion intensity measures. In this study, epistemic uncertainty with respect to the selection of the ground motion dataset and intensity measure is evaluated. In this respect, the fragility curves of building type structural simulations for four different ground motion dataset and three selected intensity measures are developed by considering two different approaches and the probable variations are investigated. The detailed evaluations which depend on the fragility curves and the deterministic earthquake scenarios indicate that compiled ground motion datasets, selected intensity measures and the fragility curve development approaches can considerably affect the analysis results. However, it can be concluded that the most influential parameter on the analysis results is intensity measure and its effective selection can considerably decrease the epistemic uncertainty in fragility analysis.

Özet

Yapıların hasargörebilirlik analizlerinin ana unsurlarını yer hareketi veri setinin derlenmesi, yapısal analiz ve yer hareketi şiddet ölçüsü seçimi olarak sıralamak mümkündür. Bu çalışmada, hasargörebilirlik analizlerinde deprem veri seti ve şiddet ölçüsü seçimine bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan epistemik belirsizlikler değerlendirilmiştir. Bu amaçla, dört farklı deprem veri seti ve seçilen üç farklı şiddet ölçüsü için bina türü yapı simülasyonlarına ait hasar potansiyeli eğrileri iki farklı yaklaşıma göre geliştirilmiş ve olası farklılıklar incelenmiştir. Hasar potansiyeli eğrileri ve deterministik deprem senaryoları kullanılarak yapılan detaylı değerlendirmeler derlenen deprem veri setleri, şiddet ölçüsü seçimi ve hasar potansiyeli eğrilerinin türetilmesinde uygulanan yöntemlerin sonuçları belirli düzeylerde etkileyebileceğini göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte sonuçları etkileyen en etkin parametrenin şiddet ölçüsü olduğu ve efektif şiddet ölçüsü seçiminin hasargörebilirlik analizlerindeki epistemik belirsizliği alt seviyelere indirgeyebileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, Ö. (2019). Hasargörebilirlik analizlerinde yer hareketi veri setine ve şiddet ölçüsüne bağlı epistemik belirsizliğin değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 2125–2140. https://ajindex.com/articles/19896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkar S., Azak T., Çan T., vd., Evolution of seismic hazard maps in Turkey, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, doi 10.1007/s10518-018-0349-1, 2018.
  2. Akkar S., Sucuoğlu H., Yakut A., Displacement-Based Fragility Functions for Low- and Mid-rise Ordinary Concrete Buildings, Earthquake Spectra, 21(4), 901–927, 2005.
  3. Ay B. Ö., Erberik M. A., Vulnerability of Turkish Low-Rise and Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(S2), 2–11, 2008.
  4. Erberik M. A., Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey, Engineering Structures 30, 1360–1374, 2008.
  5. Hsieh M. H., Lee B. J., Lei T. C., Lin J. Y., Development of medium-and low-rise reinforced concrete building fragility curves based on Chi–Chi Earthquake data, Natural Hazards, 69(1), 695–728, 2013.
  6. Uçar T., Düzgün M., Derivation of analytical fragility curves for RC buildings based on nonlinear pushover analysis, İMO Teknik Dergi, 24(3), 6421–6446, 2013.
  7. Mazılıgüney L., Yakut A., Kadaş K., Kalem İ., Fragility analysis of reinforced concrete school buildings using alternative intensity measure-based ground motion sets, 2nd Turkish Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Eskişehir-Türkiye, 25-27 Eylül, 2013.
  8. Hancilar U., Çaktı E., Erdik M., Franco G.E., Deodatis G., Earthquake vulnerability of school buildings: Probabilistic structural fragility analyses, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 67: 169–178, 2014.
  9. Karimzadeh S., Sakan A., Erberik M. A., Yakut A., Seismic damage assessment based on regional synthetic ground motion dataset: a case study for Erzincan, Turkey, Natural Hazards, doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3255-6, 2018. FEMA 154: Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C, 1988.
  10. Farsangi E.N., Rezvani F.H., Talebi M., Hashemi S.A., Seismic Risk Analysis of Steel-MRFs by Means of Fragility Curves in High Seismic Zones, Advances in Structural Engineering 17(9), 1227–1240, 2014.
  11. Lin S.-L., Uma S. R., King A., Empirical Fragility Curves for Non-Residential Buildings from the 2010–2011
  12. Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(5), 749–777, 2018.
  13. Zakeri B., Padgett J. E., Amiri G. G., Fragility Analysis of Skewed Single-Frame Concrete Box-Girder Bridges, ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 28(3): 571-582, 2014.
  14. Kadaş K., Yakut A., Re-examination of a Spectral Ground Motion Intensity Measure Base