SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Factors Affecting the Stability of Treatment of Skeletal Angle Class III Anomalies

İskeletsel Angle Sınıf III Anomalilerin Tedavisinin Stabilitesine Etki Eden Faktörler

Oğuzhan KALE
Alev AKSOY
Merve ÖZKAN
Pages
162–167
Publication Date
2021-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this seminar is; to talk about the factors that affect the stability of the treatment of dental and skeletal class III anomalies, and the current studies on long term treatment of applied therapies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Class III malocclusions are difficult anomalies due to treatment success and high relapse risk.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The treatment of class III malocclusions during the growth and development period is more difficult than the treatment of other malocclusions in the same period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this seminar is; to talk about the factors that affect the stability of the treatment of dental and skeletal class III anomalies, and the current studies on long term treatment of applied therapies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ortodontik tedavi · Relaps · Sınıf III anomaliler

Abstract

Class III malocclusions are difficult anomalies due to treatment success and high relapse risk. The treatment of class III malocclusions during the growth and development period is more difficult than the treatment of other malocclusions in the same period. Besides, treatment results can be adversely affected due to late mandibular growth. Success and stabilization of Class III malocclusion treatments depends on the dental / skeletal components of the anomaly, the severity of the anomalies, the age of onset of treatment, the effects of treatment mechanics, the changes that can occur with growth and development, the knowledge of the physician and the cooperation of the patient. The purpose of this seminar is; to talk about the factors that affect the stability of the treatment of dental and skeletal class III anomalies, and the current studies on long term treatment of applied therapies.

Özet

Sınıf III maloklüzyonlar tedavi başarısı ve yüksek relaps riski nedeniyle zor anomalilerden biri olarak tanımlanır. Büyüme ve gelişim dönemi içerisinde yapılan sınıf III maloklüzyonların tedavisi aynı dönemde yapılan diğer maloklüzyonların tedavilerine oranla daha zordur. Bunun yanı sıra geç mandibuler büyümeye bağlı olarak tedavi sonuçları olumsuz olarak etkilenebilmektedir. Sınıf III maloklüzyonların tedavilerinin başarılı olması ve stabil kalması, anomalinin dişsel/iskeletsel komponentlerine, anomalinin şiddetine, tedaviye başlama yaşına, tedavi mekaniklerinin etkilerine, büyüme ve gelişimle oluşabilecek değişimlere, hekimin bilgisine ve hastanın işbirliğine bağlıdır. Bu seminerin amacı; dişsel ve iskeletsel sınıf III anomalilerin tedavisinin stabilitesine etki eden faktörleri ve uygulanan tedavilerin uzun dönemde incelendiği güncel çalışmalardan bahsetmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, O., AKSOY, A., ÖZKAN, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Stability of Treatment of Skeletal Angle Class III Anomalies. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 162–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/745318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amado J, Sierra AM, Gallon A, Alvarez C, Baccetti T. 2008. Relationship between personality traits and cooperation of adolescent orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod, 78: 688-691. Aras A. 1996. Ortodontide Pekiştirme (Lisans üstü ders notları), 8, 15, 27, 35. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. 2004. Cephalometric variables predicting the long term success or failure of combined rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. Am J Orthod, 126: 16-22.
  2. Baccetti T, Rey D, Oberti G, Stahl F, McNamara JA. 2009. Long term outcomes of class III treatment with mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthod, 79: 828-834.
  3. Baik HS, Jee SH, Lee KJ, Oh TK. 2004. Treatment effects of Frankel functional regulator III in children with class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125: 294-301. Baik HS. 1995. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108: 583-592.
  4. Battagel JM, Orton HS. 1993. Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach. Eur J Orthod, 15: 45-55.
  5. Bos A, Vosselman N, Hoogstraten J, PrahlAndersen B. 2005. Patient compliance: a determinant of patient satisfaction? Angle Orthod, 75: 526-531.
  6. Callender RS, Barbour A. 1981. Effective communication with clients: financial arrangements. J Clin Orthod, 15: 497-500. Cozzani G. 1981. Extraoral traction and Class III treatment. Am J Orthod, 80: 638-650.
  7. Daniels AS, Seacat JD, Inglehart MR. 2009. Orthodontic treatment motivation and cooperation: a crosssectional analysis of adolescent patients' and parents' responses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136: 780-787.
  8. Deguchi T, Kanomi R, Ashizawa Y, Rosenstein SW. 1999. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children. Angle Orthod, 69: 349-355. Delaire J. 1997. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod, 19: 289-311. Demirel H. 1999. Ağız içi çift plak uygulaması ile 3. sınıf anomalilerin tedavilerine yeni bir yaklaşım. Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara,
  9. Turkey. Dinçer M, Işık-Arslan B, Gülşen A. 2008. Başlıkla stabilize edilmiş yüz maskesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, 21: 56-66.
  10. Ferro A, Nucci LP, Ferro F, Gallo C. 2003. Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,123: 423-434. Frankel R. 1970. Maxillary retrusion in Class III and treatme