SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2

Life within walking distance: A multidimensional compilation on the concept of the 15-minute city

Yürüme mesafesinde yaşam: 15 dakikalık şehir kavramı üzerine çok boyutlu bir derleme

Fatma Zehra Aksakallı(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0003-6811-6704
Hazal Ergül(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3064-8476
Fatih Karaçor(KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1201-7857
Seda Hatipoğlu(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4511-1914
Kürşat Çubuk(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8155-7123
Pages
1453–1466
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the main finding of the study, it was revealed that 15-minute city planning and studies focused more on proximity and policy, and that the dimensions of perception and participation were not sufficiently addressed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The 15-minute city model is a contemporary urban planning approach that aims to create accessible, multifunctional and livable neighborhoods where individuals can meet their daily needs within walking or cycling distance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study systematically examines 103 academic publications in the Scopus database that directly refer to the 15-minute city concept and classifies them under four dimensions: proximity, perception, participation and policy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the main finding of the study, it was revealed that 15-minute city planning and studies focused more on proximity and policy, and that the dimensions of perception and participation were not sufficiently addressed
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:15-dakikalık şehir · yakınlık · algı

Abstract

The 15-minute city model is a contemporary urban planning approach that aims to create accessible, multifunctional and livable neighborhoods where individuals can meet their daily needs within walking or cycling distance. While supporting sustainable transportation, this model also includes multidimensional goals such as social equality, environmental responsibility and quality of life based on spatial proximity. However, a holistic classification approach has not been developed in the literature between these thematic dimensions of the concept. This study systematically examines 103 academic publications in the Scopus database that directly refer to the 15-minute city concept and classifies them under four dimensions: proximity, perception, participation and policy. In this thematic analysis carried out with the content analysis method, trends and gaps in the literature were tried to be revealed both at the conceptual and applied levels. As the main finding of the study, it was revealed that 15-minute city planning and studies focused more on proximity and policy, and that the dimensions of perception and participation were not sufficiently addressed

Özet

15 dakikalık şehir modeli, bireylerin günlük yaşam gereksinimlerini yürüme veya bisiklet mesafesinde karşılayabileceği, erişilebilir, çok işlevli ve yaşanabilir mahalleler oluşturmayı amaçlayan çağdaş bir kent planlama yaklaşımıdır. Bu model, sürdürülebilir ulaşımı desteklerken, mekansal yakınlık temelinde toplumsal eşitlik, çevresel sorumluluk ve yaşam kalitesi gibi çok boyutlu hedefleri de içermektedir. Ancak literatürde kavramın bu tematik boyutları arasında bütüncül bir sınıflandırma yaklaşımı geliştirilememiştir. Bu çalışma, Scopus veri tabanında yer alan ve 15 dakikalık şehir kavramına doğrudan atıfta bulunan 103 akademik yayını sistematik bir şekilde inceleyerek; yakınlık, algı, katılım ve politika olmak üzere dört boyut altında sınıflandırmaktadır. İçerik analizi yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen bu tematik çözümlemede hem kavramsal hem de uygulamalı düzeyde literatürdeki eğilimler ve boşluklar ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmanın ana bulgusu olarak 15 dakikalık şehir planlaması ve çalışmalarının daha çok yakınlık ve politika üzerine yoğunlaştığı, algı ve katılım boyutlarının yeterince ele alınmadığı ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksakallı, F. Z., Ergül, H., Karaçor, F., Hatipoğlu, S., Çubuk, K. (2026). Life within walking distance: A multidimensional compilation on the concept of the 15-minute city. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 2, 1453–1466. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1726927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (116)

  1. Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D., Gall C., Pratlong F. Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities, Smart cities, 4 (1), 93-111, 2021.
  2. Allam Z., Bibri S. E., Chabaud D., Moreno C. The Theoretical Practical and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability, Energies, 15 (16), 2022.
  3. Caprotti F., Duarte C., Joss S. The 15-minute city as paranoid urbanism: Ten critical reflections, Cities, 155, 2024.
  4. Guzman L. A., Oviedo D., Cantillo-Garcia V. A. Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions, Cities, 148, 2024.
  5. Kędra A., Maleszyk P., Visvizi A. Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context, Land Use Policy, 129, 2023.
  6. Lu M., Diab E. Developing a 15-minute city policy? Understanding differences between policies and physical barriers, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 191, 2025.
  7. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7 (4), 265-284, 2002.
  8. Fuhrmann M. 15-Minute City - From Concept To Practical Dimension. Complexity Of Housing Estates: A Proposal For A Measuring Tool, Prace i Studia Geograficzne, 69 (4), 61-72, 2024.
  9. Geurs K. T., van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions, Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2), 127-140, 2004.
  10. Huskinson M., Serrano-Estrada L., Martí P. Perceived accessibility matters: Unveiling key urban parameters through traditional and technology-driven participation methods, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24, 100523, 2024.
  11. Nasution A. D., Zahrah W. Community Perception on Public Open Space and Quality of Life in Medan Indonesia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 585-594, 2014.
  12. Kyttä M., Broberg A., Tzoulas T., Snabb K. Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality, Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30-46, 2013.
  13. Godwyll J. M., Buzinde C. N., Glover T. D., White D. D., Frazier A. E., Manuel-Navarrete D. When perception is reality: examining perceived accessibility of recreational public spaces through social space production, World Leisure Journal, 67 (2), 241-263, 2024.
  14. Blanco I., Lowndes V., Salazar Y. Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: how rules practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change, Critical Policy Studies, 16 (2), 204-223, 2022.
  15. Healey P. Collaborative planning shaping places in fragmented societies, Bloomsbury Publishing, New York, A.B.D., 1997.
  16. Gehl J., Cities for people, Island Press, Washington DC, A.B.D., 2010.
  17. Ulloa-Leon F., Correa-Parra J., Vergara-Perucich F., Cancino-Contreras F., Aguirre-Nuñez C. “15-Minute City” and Elderly People: Thinking about Healthy Cities, Smart Cities, 6 (2), 1043-1058, 2023.
  18. Gaglione F., Gargiulo C., Zucaro F., Cottrill C. 15-minute neighbourhood accessibility: A comparison between Naples and London, European Transport - Trasporti Europei, 85 (10), 48295, 2021.
  19. Barratt P., Swetnam R. A civic and sustainable 15-minute campus? Universities should embrace the 15-minute city concept to help create vibrant sustainable communities, Local Economy, 37 (8), 734-744, 2022.
  20. Lima F. T., Brown N. C., Duarte J. P. A Grammar-Based Optimization Approach for Designing Urban Fabrics and Locating Amenities for 15-Minute Cities, Buildings, 12 (8), 1157, 2022.
  21. Balletto G., Ladu M., Milesi A., Borruso G. A methodological approach on disused public properties in the 15-minute city perspective, Sustainability, 13 (2), 1-19, 2021.
  22. Moreno C., Gall C., Woo J., Lee D., Bencekri M. Assessing accessibility of cultural sites through the 15-minute city framework in Seoul, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 29 (1), 8-39, 2025
  23. Menichinelli M., Napolitano M., D’Elia L., Bianchini M., D’Ambrosio S., Lambert S. Assessing the impact of maker services in Barcelona and Milan towards the 15-minute city model through their accessibility, Design Journal, 27 (6), 1229-1251, 2024.
  24. Bencekri M., Kwak J., Lee D., Csiba-Herczeg A., Lee S. A systematic review of the 15-minute city framework: implications for environmental heritage preservation in the Anthropocene, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2025.
  25. Jeon Y., Jung S. Spatial Equity of Urban Park Distribution: Examining the Floating Population within Urban Park Catchment Areas in the Context of the 15-Minute City, Land, 13 (1), 2024.
  26. Hochachka G. When concern is not enough: Overcoming the climate awareness-action gap, Ambio, 53 (8), 1182-1202, 2024.
  27. Marchigiani E., Bonfantini B. Urban Transition and the Return of Neighbourhood Planning, Questioning the Proximity Syndrome and the 15-Minute City, Sustainability, 14 (9), 2022.
  28. Zhang D., Ma S., Fan J., Xie D., Jiang H., Wang G. Assessing spatial equity in urban park accessibility: an improve two-step catchment area method from the perspective of 15-mintue city concept, Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, 104824, 2023.
  29. Aristizábal J. E., Sarache W., Escobar D. A. Spatial Regressiion Model of Urban Walkability Under the 15-Minute City Approach, Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 49 (3), 1037-1045, 2023.
  30. Di Marino M., Tomaz E., Henriques C., Chavoshi S. H. The 15-minute city concept and new working spaces: a planning perspective from Oslo and Lisbon, European Planning Studies, 31 (3), 598-620, 2023.
  31. Shoina M., Voukkali I., Anagnostopoulos A., Papamichael I., Stylianou M., Zorpas A. A. The 15-minute city concept: The case study within a neighbourhood of Thessaloniki, Waste Management and Research, 42(8), 694-710, 2024.
  32. Noworól A., Kopyciński P., Hałat P., Salamon J., Hołuj A. The 15-Minute City-The Geographical Proximity of Services in Krakow, Sustainability, 14 (12), 7103, 2022.
  33. Misztal M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the daily mobility of Warsaw residents, Prace i Studia Geograficzne, 68 (3), 23-37, 2023.
  34. Zysk E., Zalewska K. The Methodology for Assessing the 15 Minute Age-Friendly Walkability (AFW) of Urban Public Spaces, Sustainability, 16 (15), 2024.
  35. Lima F. T., Costa F. The Quest for Proximity: A Systematic Review of Computational Approaches towards 15-Minute Cities, Architecture, 3 (3), 393-409, 2023.
  36. Allam Z., Bibri S. E., Chabaud D., Moreno C. The Theoretical Practical and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability, Energies, 15 (16), 6042, 2022.
  37. Rao F., Kong Y., Ng K. H., Xie Q., Zhu Y. Unravelling the Spatial Arrangement of the 15-Minute City: A Comparative Study of Shanghai Melbourne and Portland, Planning Theory and Practice, 25 (2), 184-206, 2024.
  38. Pozoukidou G., Angelidou M. Urban Planning in the 15-Minute City: Revisited under Sustainable and Smart City Developments until 2030, Smart Cities, 5 (4), 1356-1375, 2022. 39. Hölzel M., Kolsch K. H., de Vries W. T. Location of Coworking Spaces (CWSs) Regarding Vicinity Land Use and Points of Interest (POIs), Land, 11 (3), 354, 2022.
  39. Allam Z., Khavarian-Garmsir A. R., Lassaube U., Chabaud D., Moreno C. Mapping the Implementation Practices of the 15-Minute City, Smart Cities, 7 (4), 2094-2109, 2024.
  40. Bruno D. M., Musante G., Dacarro F. Materials for a debate on the 15-minute city: Public transportation’s effect on urban space and time in two Asia-based alternative proposals, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 23 (6), 2134-2156, 2023.
  41. Balletto G., Sechi F., Borruso G., Sinatra M., Meloni I., Fancello G. Mobility and land-use system in the sport mega-events. The case of the Cagliari stadium (Sardinia Italy), European Transport-Trasporti Europei, 93, 2023.
  42. Harroucha R., Chaouni A. A. GIS-based approach evaluating sustainable spatio-functional accessibility to mosques, Annals of GIS, 29 (3), 429-439, 2023.
  43. Fabris L. M. F., Camerin F., Semprebon G., Balzarotti R. M. New healthy settlements responding to pandemic outbreaks: Approaches from (and for) the global city, Plan Journal, 5 (2), 385-406, 2020.
  44. Calafati L., Froud J., Haslam C., Johal S., Williams K. Place and mobility in Wales: Challenges and opportunities for reducing car use in a car-dependent low-density country, Local Economy, 38 (8), 773-793, 2024.
  45. Mozaffaree Pour N., Partanen J. Planning for the urban future: two-level spatial analysis to discover 15-Minute City potential in urban area and expansion in Tallinn Estonia, Journal of Computational Social Science, 7 (1), 777-807, 2024.
  46. Bartzokas-Tsiompras A., Bakogiannis E. Quantifying and visualizing the 15-Minute walkable city concept across Europe: a multicriteria approach, Journal of Maps, 19 (1), 2141143, 2023.
  47. Negm H., Miller H., El-Geneidy A. Exploring the X-Minute City by Travel Purpose in Montréal Canada, Transport Findings, 2023.
  48. Monteiro J., Para M., Sousa N., Natividade-Jesus E., Ostorero C., Coutinho-Rodrigues J. Filling in the Spaces: Compactifying Cities towards Accessibility and Active Transport, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(3), 120, 2023.
  49. Drobniak A., Stangel M. Fostering Local Urban Centers in relation to district train stations as part of the transition from a post-industrial to a sustainable city: a case study of Katowice, Bulletin of Geography, Socio-Economic Series, 64, 103-116, 2024.
  50. Barbieri L., D’Autilia R., Marrone P., Montella I. Graph Representation of the 15-Minute City: A Comparison between Rome London and Paris, Sustainability, 15 (4), 3772, 2023.
  51. Pollack R., Olsen J. R., Heppenstall A., Hoehn A., Boyd J., Hardy V. P., Littlejohn J., Stevenson A., Mitchell R., Meier P., Stokes J. How could 20-minute neighbourhoods impact health and health inequalities? A policy scoping review, BMC Public Health, 24 (1), 3426, 2024.
  52. Song G., He X., Kong Y., Li K., Song H., Zhai S., Luo J. Improving the Spatial Accessibility of Community-Level Healthcare Service toward the ‘15-Minute City’ Goal in China, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11 (8), 436, 2022.
  53. Abouhassan M., Elkhateeb S., Anwar R. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Computational Algorithms to Optimize the 15-Minute City Model, Urban Science, 8 (4), 259, 2024.
  54. Marquet O., Anguelovski I., Nello-Deakin S., Honey-Rosés J. Decoding the 15-Minute City Debate: Conspiracies Backlash and Dissent in Planning for Proximity, Journal of the American Planning Association, 91 (1), 117-125, 2024.
  55. Brownrigg-Gleeson M. L., Monzon A., Alonso A. Designing the 15-Minute City at Street Level: a Bottom-Up Analysis of Social Proximity, Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 56 (220), 369-390, 2024.
  56. Colaço R., de Abreu e Silva J. Does the 15-minute City Promote Sustainable Travel? Quantifying the 15-minute City and Assessing its Impact on Individual Motorized Travel Active Travel Public Transit Ridership and CO2 Emissions, Networks and Spatial Economics, 1-25, 2025.
  57. Dumedah G., Iddrisu S., Kpevu G. A., Dakurah G., Adams C. A. Do informal urban communities in Ghana qualify as a 15-Minute City based on access to socioeconomic activities?, African Geographical Review, 44 (1), 70-86, 2024.
  58. Ferrer-ortiz C., Marquet O., Mojica L., Vich G. Barcelona under the 15-Minute City Lens: Mapping the Accessibility and Proximity Potential Based on Pedestrian Travel Times, Smart Cities, 5 (1), 146-161, 2022.
  59. Carpio-Pinedo J., Benito-Moreno M., Lamíquiz-Daudén P. J. Beyond land use mix walkable trips. An approach based on parcel-level land use data and network analysis, Journal of Maps, 17 (1), 23-30, 2021.
  60. Bertoni A., Dubini P., Monti A. Bringing back in the spatial dimension in the assessment of cultural and creative industries and its relationship with a city’s sustainability: The case of milan, Sustainability, 13 (19), 10878, 2021.
  61. Salih N. M. M., Hussein S. H. Cities After Pandemic: Enabling Social Distancing As A New Design Standard To Achieve Urban Immunity, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 20 (4), 345-360, 2021.
  62. Grant J. L. Complete Community: Planning Theory From Practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 90 (2), 213-229, 2024.
  63. Borghetti F., Longo M., Mazzoncini R., Somaschini Cl., Cesarini L., Contestabile L. Relationship between railway stations and the territory: Case study in LombardY - Italy for 15-min station, International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 5 (4), 367-378, 2021.
  64. Ninivaggi F., Cutrini E. Resilience Proximity and the 15-Minute City: A Case Study for Central Italy, Networks and Spatial Economics, 1-9, 2025.
  65. Samson C., Freudendal-Pedersen M. Restructuring urban planning to facilitate sustainable consumption, Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, 2022.
  66. Casarin G., MacLeavy J., Manley D. Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city, Urban Studies, 60 (16), 3167-3186, 2023.
  67. Pinto F., Akhavan M. Scenarios for a Post-Pandemic City: urban planning strategies and challenges of making “Milan 15-minutes city.”, Transportation research procedia, 60, 370-377, 2021.
  68. Wang J., Kwan M. P., Xiu G., Deng F. A robust method for evaluating the potentials of 15-minute cities: Implications for sustainable urban futures, Geography and Sustainability, 5 (4), 597-606, 2024.
  69. Nijkamp P., Kourtit K., Krugman P., Moreno C. Old wisdom and the New Economic Geography: Managing uncertainty in 21st century regional and urban development, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 16 (10), 100124, 2024.
  70. Elldér E. Built environment and the evolution of the “15-minute city”: A 25-year longitudinal study of 200 Swedish cities, Cities, 149 (2), 104942, 2024.
  71. Liu D., Wang J., Song J., Kwan M. P., Fang D., Ariga T., Chen Y., Stinckwich S. Exploring the inequality in fine-grained primary healthcare accessibility in Macau based on high-resolution geospatial data under the 15-minute city framework, Applied Geography, 174, 103473, 2025.
  72. Schultheiss M. E., Pattaroni L., Kaufmann V. Planning urban proximities: An empirical analysis of how residential preferences conflict with the urban morphologies and residential practices, Cities, 152, 105215, 2024.
  73. Mouratidis K. Time to challenge the 15-minute city: Seven pitfalls for sustainability equity livability and spatial analysis, Cities, 153, 105274, 2024.
  74. Kim Y., Lee S. Neighborhood-level determining factors of travel distance by trip purpose: Policy implications for the N-minute city, Cities, 156, 105464, 2025.
  75. Núñez M. B. F., Maciejewska M., Mojica L., Marquet O. Car-use reduction in 15-Minute Cities. A matter of modal shift or shorter travel distances?, Journal of Urban Mobility, 6, 100093, 2024.
  76. Liu D., Kan Z., Lee J. The proposal of a 15-minute city composite index through integrating GPS trajectory data-inferred urban function attraction based on the Bayesian framework, Applied Geography, 173, 103451, 2024.
  77. Grant R. J., Li H., Oner A. C. Legacy of arts and chrono-urbanism in Wynwood Miami, Cities, 159, 105787, 2025. 79. Mombelli S., Miralles-Guasch C., Marquet O. Can proximity forge strong bonds? Exploring the relationship between urban proximity and social cohesion at the neighbourhood level, Sustainable Cities and Society, 119, 106096, 2025.
  78. Jiang Z., Wu C., Chung H. The 15-minute community life circle for older people: Walkability measurement based on service accessibility and street-level built environment - A case study of Suzhou China, Cities, 157, 105587, 2025.
  79. Villalba A., Vila L. E., Carot J. M. Analyzing patterns of accessibility to schools: A gravitational metrics study in València, AIMS Mathematics, 10 (1), 809-825, 2025.
  80. Elldér E. Exploring socio-economic inequalities in access to the 15-minute city across 200 Swedish built-up areas, Journal of Transport Geography, 122, 105587, 2025.
  81. Murgante B., Valluzzi R., Annunziata A. Developing a 15-minute city: Evaluating urban quality using configurational analysis. The case study of Terni and Matera Italy, Applied Geography, 162, 103171, 2024.
  82. Liu D., Kwan M. P., Wang J. Developing the 15-Minute City: A comprehensive assessment of the status in Hong Kong, Travel Behaviour and Society, 34, 100666, 2024.
  83. Gorrini A., Presicce D., Messa F., Choubassi R. Walkability for children in Bologna: Beyond the 15-minute city framework, Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100052, 2023.
  84. Birkenfeld C., Victoriano-Habit R., Alousi-Jones M., Soliz A., El-Geneidy A. Who is living a local lifestyle? Towards a better understanding of the 15-minute-city and 30-minute-city concepts from a behavioural perspective in Montréal Canada, Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100048, 2023.
  85. Lu M., Diab E. Understanding the determinants of x-minute city policies: A review of the North American and Australian cities’ planning documents, Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 2023.
  86. Zhang S., Wu W., Xiao Z., Wu S., Zhao Q., Ding D., Wang L. Creating livable cities for healthy ageing: Cognitive health in older adults and their 15-minute walkable neighbourhoods, Cities, 137, 104312, 2023.
  87. Tammaru T., Sevtsuk A., Witlox F. Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition, Journal of Transport Geography, 112, 103686, 2023.
  88. Poorthuis A., Zook M. Moving the 15-minute city beyond the urban core: The role of accessibility and public transport in the Netherlands, Journal of Transport Geography, 110, 103629, 2023.
  89. Jaroszewicz J., Denis M., Fijałkowska A., Graszka O., Pluto-Kossakowska J., Krzysztofowicz S. Spatially explicit mixed-use indicators to measure life quality across the city - A conceptual framework and case study: Piaseczno - A medium sized city in the peri-urban zone of Warsaw Poland, Cities, 137, 104296, 2023.
  90. Li Y., Chai Y., Chen Z., Li C. From lockdown to precise prevention: Adjusting epidemic-related spatial regulations from the perspectives of the 15-minute city and spatiotemporal planning, Sustainable Cities and Society, 92, 104490, 2023.
  91. Rhoads D., Solé-Ribalta A., Borge-Holthoefer J. The inclusive 15-minute city: Walkability analysis with sidewalk networks, Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 100, 101936, 2023.
  92. Willberg E., Fink C., Toivonen T. The 15-minute city for all? - Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility, Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 103521, 2023.
  93. Khavarian-Garmsir A. R., Sharifi A., Sadeghi A. The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods, Cities, 132 (10), 104101, 2023.
  94. Abdullah M., Ali N., Javid M. A., Hussain Q. Awareness and knowledge levels of engineering and planning students and practitioners about the 15-minute city concept in a developing country, Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 100037, 2022.
  95. Staricco L. 15- 10- or 5-minute city? A focus on accessibility to services in Turin Italy, Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 100030, 2022.
  96. Logan T. M., Hobbs M. H., Conrow L. C., Reid N. L., Young R. A., Anderson M. J. The x-minute city: Measuring the 10 15 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design, Cities, 131, 103924, 2022.
  97. Hosford K., Beairsto J., Winters M. Is the 15-minute city within reach? Evaluating walking and cycling accessibility to grocery stores in Vancouver, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100602, 2022.
  98. Kissfazekas K. Circle of paradigms? Or ‘15-minute’ neighbourhoods from the 1950s, Cities, 123, 103587, 2022.
  99. Guzman L. A., Arellana J., Oviedo D., Moncada Aristizábal C. A. COVID-19 activity and mobility patterns in Bogotá. Are we ready for a ‘15-minute city’?, Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, 245-256, 2021.
  100. Ko S., Choi I. jung Kim D. guen Shin J. Segmented user demand forecasting for libraries in the 15-minute city considering users’ preferences and spatial patterns, Cities, 151, 105159, 2024.
  101. Williams T., Bonsma-Fisher M., Nelson T., Whitehurst D. G. T., Winters M. Cycling towards complete communities: Estimating access to destinations via low traffic stress cycling, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101179, 2024.
  102. Jin T., Wang K., Xin Y., Shi J., Hong Y., Witlox F. Is a 15-Minute City Within Reach? Measuring Multimodal Accessibility and Carbon Footprint in 12 Major American Cities, Land Use Policy, 142, 107180, 2024.
  103. Giuffrida N., Mölter A., Pilla F., Carroll P., Ottomanelli M. On the equity of the x-minute city from the perspective of walkability, Transportation Engineering, 16, 100244, 2024.
  104. Akrami M., Sliwa M. W., Rynning M. K. Walk further and access more! Exploring the 15-minute city concept in Oslo Norway, Journal of Urban Mobility, 5, 100077, 2024.
  105. Elldér E. The 15-minute city dilemma? Balancing local accessibility and gentrification in Gothenburg Sweden, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135, 104360, 2024.
  106. Guzman L. A., Oviedo D., Cantillo-Garcia V. A. Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions, Cities, 148, 104882, 2024.
  107. Marquet O., Mojica L., Fernández-Núñez M. B., Maciejewska M. Pathways to 15-Minute City adoption: Can our understanding of climate policies’ acceptability explain the backlash towards x-minute city programs?, Cities, 148, 104878, 2024.
  108. Murgante B., Patimisco L., Annunziata A. Developing a 15-minute city: A comparative study of four Italian Cities-Cagliari Perugia Pisa and Trieste, Cities, 146, 104765, 2024.
  109. Korah P. I., Cobbinah P. B., Adu P. Beyond the known: Walking accessibility twist to new cities. Habitat International, 144, 102997, 2024.
  110. Harroucha R., Chaouni A. A. Mosques pedestrian accessibility analysis under the 15 min cities concept, GeoJournal, 88 (4), 3575-3594, 2023.
  111. Buliung R. 15-minute cities ‘walkability’ and last millimeter problems, Disability and Society, 40 (5), 1425-1429, 2024.
  112. Bocca A. Sustainable development and proximity city. The environmental role of new public spaces, TeMA, 1, 71-87, 2024.
  113. Bekci B., Sipahi M. Investigation of spatial accessibility on the scale of pedestrian areas, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering Architecture of Gazi University, 38 (4), 2155-2165, 2023.
  114. Marquet O., Mojica L., Fernández-Núñez M. B., Maciejewska M. Pathways to 15-Minute City adoption: Can our understanding of climate policies’ acceptability explain the backlash towards x-minute city programs?, Cities, 148 (6), 104878, 2024.
  115. Şahin Y. D., Sirel B. Determining accessibility levels on pedestrian routes: The sample of Çukurova University campus example, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering Architecture of Gazi University, 39 (2), 811-824, 2024.
  116. Zhang S., Zhen F., Kong Y., Lobsang T., Zou S. Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50 (2), 500-514, 2023