SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acil Yardım ve Afet Bilimi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Disaster Managers' Awareness of Smart City Applications

Afet Yöneticilerinin Akıllı Kent Uygulamalarına Yönelik Farkındalıklarının Değerlendirilmesi

Mehtap Kılıç(Ardahan Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2344-2381
Ramazan Aslan(ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5602-6379
Pages
23–30
Publication Date
2025-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insights for strengthening urban resilience through informed disaster management practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Disasters lead to economic, social, and physical losses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the most effective strategies to mitigate these losses is the adoption of smart city applications, which play a vital role in all phases of disaster management especially in risk reduction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insights for strengthening urban resilience through informed disaster management practices.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Afet Yönetimi · Akıllı Kent · Afet Yöneticisi

Abstract

Introduction: Disasters lead to economic, social, and physical losses. One of the most effective strategies to mitigate these losses is the adoption of smart city applications, which play a vital role in all phases of disaster management especially in risk reduction. Purpose: Through technologies such as real-time data analysis and early warning systems, smart cities help identify potential hazards, improve urban safety, and support crisis preparedness. For these benefits to be fully realized, it is essential for disaster managers to develop an awareness of smart city concepts and integrate them into their planning and decision-making processes. Method: This study was conducted using a quantitative research method. Data were collected through a survey to evaluate the awareness levels of smart city applications among managers working in the Provincial Disaster and Emergency Directorates operating in all 81 provinces of Türkiye. A total of 225 branch managers were invited to participate, and responses were received from 171 participants (RR = 76%). Result: Findings show that disaster managers generally demonstrate strong awareness of smart cities and their components. Regionally, Marmara, Black Sea, and Southeastern Anatolia displayed higher levels of engagement, whereas the Mediterranean region showed lower scores. Conclusion: These findings provide valuable insights for strengthening urban resilience through informed disaster management practices.

Özet

Giriş: Afetler; ekonomik, sosyal ve fiziksel kayıplara yol açmaktadır. Bu kayıpları azaltmanın en etkili stratejilerinden biri, afet yönetiminin tüm aşamalarında, özellikle de risk azaltma evresinde önemli rol oynayan akıllı kent uygulamalarının benimsenmesidir. Amaç: Gerçek zamanlı veri analizi ve erken uyarı sistemleri gibi teknolojiler aracılığıyla akıllı kentler, potansiyel tehlikelerin belirlenmesine, kentsel güvenliğin artırılmasına ve kriz hazırlıklarının desteklenmesine katkı sağlar. Bu faydaların tam anlamıyla sağlanabilmesi için afet yöneticilerinin akıllı kent kavramlarına yönelik farkındalık geliştirmeleri ve bu kavramları planlama ile karar alma süreçlerine entegre etmeleri gerekmektedir. Yöntem: Bu çalışma, nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Türkiye’nin 81 ilinde faaliyet gösteren İl Afet ve Acil Durum Müdürlüklerinde görev yapan yöneticilerin akıllı kent uygulamalarına yönelik farkındalık düzeylerini değerlendirmek amacıyla anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Toplam 225 şube müdürü çalışmaya davet edilmiş, 171 katılımcıdan yanıt alınmıştır (YYO = %76). Bulgular: Bulgular, afet yöneticilerinin genel olarak akıllı kentler ve bunların bileşenlerine dair güçlü bir farkındalığa sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bölgesel olarak Marmara, Karadeniz ve Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgeleri daha yüksek düzeyde katılım sergilerken, Akdeniz Bölgesi daha düşük puanlar almıştır. Sonuç: Bu bulgular, bilinçli afet yönetimi uygulamaları yoluyla kentsel dirençliliğin güçlendirilmesine yönelik önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılıç, M., Aslan, R. (2025). Evaluation of Disaster Managers' Awareness of Smart City Applications. Acil Yardım ve Afet Bilimi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 23–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/1628913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. United Nations, Report of the open-ended intergovernmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction, 2016. https://www.undrr.org/publication/report-open-ended-intergovernmental-expert-working-group-indicators-and-terminology (accessed 15 October 2024).
  2. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, Disaster Year In Review 2023, 2024. https://files.emdat.be/2024/04/CredCrunch74.pdf.
  3. Uzun, A., Oğlakci, B. (2019). Turkey’s earthquake history and institution based earthquake reduction policies and strategies, in: P. Farabollini, F. Romana Lugeri, S. Mugnano (Eds.), Earthquake Risk Perception, Communication And Mitigation Strategies Across Europe, Second.
  4. Memiş, L., Babaoglu, C. (2020). Farklı boyutlarıyla afet yönetimi, Afet Yönetimi ve Teknoloji, in: M. Yaman, E. Çakır (Eds.), Nobel Yayıncılık, pp. 163–178.
  5. UNISDR, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, 2015.
  6. UN-Habitat, World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities, UN-Habitat, Nairobi, Kenya, 2022.
  7. Kong, X., Liu, X., Jedari, B. Li, M., Wan, L., Xia, F. (2019). Mobile crowdsourcing in smart cities: technologies, applications, and future challenges, IEEE Internet Things J. 6. 8095–8113.https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2921879.
  8. Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M. (2015). Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and ınitiatives, Journal of Urban Technology 22. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
  9. Schiavo, F.T., de Magalhães, C.F. (2022) Smart sustainable cities: the essentials for managers’ and leaders’ ınitiatives within the complex context of differing definitions and assessments, Smart Cities 5. 994–1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030050
  10. Gomstyn, A. Jonker, A. What is a smart city?, 2023. https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-city.
  11. UNECE, Smart Sustainable Cities, 2024. https://unece.org/housing/smart-sustainable-cities.
  12. Cohen, B. (2014). The Smartest Cities In The World 2015: Methodology, https://www.fastcompany.com/3038818/the-smartest-cities-in-the-world-2015-methodology
  13. Hartama, D., Mawengkang, H., Zarlis, M., Sembiring, R.W. (2017). Smart city: utilization of ıt resources to encounter natural disaster, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 890. 12076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012076.
  14. Michelucci, F.V., de Marco, A., Tanda, A. (2016). Defining the role of the smart-city manager: an analysis of responsibilities and skills, Journal of Urban Technology 23. 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1164439.
  15. Hoxha, V., Pallaska, E., A study of components predicting smart governance in Prishtina, Kosovo, Urbani izziv 34 (2023) 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2023-34-02-01.
  16. Ateş, M., Erinsel Önder, D. (2018). The concept of ‘smart city’ and criticism within the context of its transforming meaning, MEGARON 14 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2018.45087.
  17. AFAD, AFAD Hakkında, 2021. https://www.afad.gov.tr/afadhakkinda (accessed 29 July 2024).
  18. Göksoy Sevinçli, B. Scale Development and Validity Study for Smart City, Urban Academy 16 (2023) 1497–1524. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1287596.
  19. Telli, R. Türkiye’de Ulaşım Altyapısının Bölgesel Kalkınmaya Etkileri, Journal of Turkish Social Sciences Research 5 (2020) 53–69.
  20. Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliği, TMMOB Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Raporu, 2023.
  21. İstanbul Kalkınma Ajansı, 2014-2023 İstanbul Bölge Planı, 2014.
  22. Lenz, B., Kolarova, V., Stark, K. Gender Issues in the Digitalized ‘Smart’ Mobility World – Conceptualization and Empirical Findings Applying a Mixed Methods Approach, in: H. Krömker (Ed.), HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 378–392.
  23. Singh, Y.J. Is smart mobility also gender-smart?, Journal of Gender Studies 29 (2020) 832–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1650728.
  24. Winter, S.C., Obara, L.M., Barchi, F. Environmental Correlates of Health-Related Quality of Life among Women Living in Informal Settlements in Kenya, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203948.
  25. Myrttinen, H. Security Sector Governance, Security Sector Reform and Gender, DCAF; OSCE/ODIHR; UN Women, Geneva, 2019.
  26. Taipale, S. The use of e-government services and the Internet: The role of socio-demographic, economic and geographical predictors, Telecommunications Policy 37 (2013) 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.05.005.
  27. Mohammadian, H.D., Langari, Z.G. Castro, M., Wittberg, V. (2022). Smart governance for educational sustainability: hybrid smes & the 5 th wave theory towards mapping the future education in post-covid era, in: 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tunis, Tunisia, IEEE, pp. 1916–1926.
  28. Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A.L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N.A.M., Sen, S.K., Sivapalan, S., Novo-Corti, I., Venkatesan, M., Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions, Environ Dev Sustain 23. 6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y.
  29. Almeida, F., Guimarães, C.M., Amorim, V. (2024). Exploring the differences and similarities between smart cities and sustainable cities through an ıntegrative review, Sustainability 16. 8890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208890.
  30. Soja, E., Soja, P. (2020). Fostering ICT use by older workers, JEIM 33. 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2018-0282.
  31. Elvas, L.B., Mataloto, B.M., Martins, A.L., Ferreira, J.C. (2021). Disaster management in smart cities, Smart Cities 4. 819–839. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020042.
  32. Moura, F., de Abreu e Silva, J. (2019). Smart cities: definitions, evolution of the concept and examples of ınitiatives, in: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., Wall T. (Eds.), Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 1–9.
  33. Ullah, A., Anwar, S.M., Li, J., Nadeem, L., Mahmood, T., Rehman, A., Saba, T. (2024). Smart cities: the role of Internet of things and machine learning in realizing a data-centric smart environment, Complex Intell. Syst. 10. 1607–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01175-4
  34. Almeida, F., Guimarães, C.M., Amorim, V. (2024). Exploring the differences and similarities between smart cities and sustainable cities through an ıntegrative review, Sustainability 16. 8890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208890.