Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 65 Sayı: 2

THE CLASH BETWEEN PRIDE AND JOY, FORM AND ECSTACY IN THE CROWN: APOLLONIAN ELIZABETH AND DIONYSIAN MARGARET

THE CROWN DİZİSİNDE GURUR İLE NEŞENİN, BİÇİM İLE COŞKUNUN ÇATIŞMASI: APOLLONCU ELİZABETH VE DİONYSOSÇU MARGARET

Pages
1407–1440
Publication Date
2025-12-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By reading Elizabeth and Margaret through the Apollonian and Dionysian lens, the article offers a fresh contribution to media studies, cultural theory, and modern receptions of classical philosophy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article offers a Nietzschean interpretation of Netflix’s historical drama The Crown, focusing on the dialectical tension between Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret as dramatized in the show’s first two seasons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on Friedrich Nietzsche’s theory of the Apollonian and Dionysian principles from The Birth of Tragedy, it argues that Elizabeth and Margaret function as symbolic embodiments of two opposing yet interdependent forces: the Apollonian drive for order, restraint, and institutional continuity, and the Dionysian impulse toward passion, rebellion, and ecstatic self-expression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By reading Elizabeth and Margaret through the Apollonian and Dionysian lens, the article offers a fresh contribution to media studies, cultural theory, and modern receptions of classical philosophy.
🔬Design:İnceleme Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:The Crown · Kraliçe II. Elizabeth · Prenses Margaret

Abstract

This article offers a Nietzschean interpretation of Netflix’s historical drama The Crown, focusing on the dialectical tension between Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret as dramatized in the show’s first two seasons. Drawing on Friedrich Nietzsche’s theory of the Apollonian and Dionysian principles from The Birth of Tragedy, it argues that Elizabeth and Margaret function as symbolic embodiments of two opposing yet interdependent forces: the Apollonian drive for order, restraint, and institutional continuity, and the Dionysian impulse toward passion, rebellion, and ecstatic self-expression. While Elizabeth’s Apollonian temperament sustains the dignity and discipline of the monarchy, Margaret’s Dionysian vitality introduces the emotional complexity and subversive energy that threaten its decorous façade. Through detailed close readings of key episodes, the article traces how The Crown stages this philosophical and aesthetic clash as both a personal sibling rivalry and a broader ideological struggle between tradition and transformation within a postwar constitutional monarchy. The article situates this dynamic within the broader cultural and symbolic economy of royal representation, demonstrating how the series employs mythic archetypes to interrogate the psychic and political costs of sovereignty, gendered authority, and national symbolism. It also engages with existing scholarship on The Crown’s visual politics, gender dynamics, and historiographical approach, while extending the conversation by introducing a classical philosophical framework that has been largely absent from critical analyses of the series. Ultimately, this study proposes that The Crown not only reflects contemporary anxieties surrounding monarchy and modernity but also enacts a televisual tragedy in Nietzschean terms: a sustained dramatization of the fragile equilibrium between form and chaos, discipline and desire. By reading Elizabeth and Margaret through the Apollonian and Dionysian lens, the article offers a fresh contribution to media studies, cultural theory, and modern receptions of classical philosophy.

Özet

Bu makale, Netflix’in tarihsel drama dizisi The Crown’ı Nietzscheci bir perspektiften ele alarak, dizinin ilk iki sezonunda Kraliçe II. Elizabeth ile Prenses Margaret arasında dramatize edilen diyalektik gerilimi analiz etmektedir. Friedrich Nietzsche’nin Tragedyanın Doğuşu adlı eserinde ortaya koyduğu Apolloncu ve Dionysosçu ilkelere dayanarak, Elizabeth ve Margaret’in birbirine zıt ama karşılıklı bağımlı iki kuvvetin simgesel tezahürleri olarak kurgulandığı savunulmaktadır: Apolloncu düzen, itidal ve kurumsal süreklilik arzusu ile Dionysosçu tutku, başkaldırı ve coşkulu kendilik ifadesi arzusu. Elizabeth’in Apolloncu mizacı monarşinin vakarını ve disiplinini sürdürürken, Margaret’in Dionysosçu canlılığı bu düzenin cilalı yüzeyine sızan duygusal karmaşıklığı ve yıkıcı enerjiyi temsil eder. Makale, önemli bölümlere dair yakın okumalarla bu felsefi ve estetik çatışmanın hem kardeşler arası kişisel bir rekabeti hem de savaş sonrası anayasal monarşi içinde gelenekle dönüşüm arasındaki daha geniş ideolojik mücadeleyi nasıl sahnelediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu dinamik, kraliyet temsiline dair kültürel ve simgesel ekonomi bağlamında değerlendirilmekte; dizinin mitik arketipleri kullanarak egemenliğin, toplumsal cinsiyet temelli otoritenin ve ulusal sembolizmin ruhsal ve politik bedellerini sorguladığı savunulmaktadır. The Crown üzerine yapılmış mevcut çalışmalardaki görsel temsil, toplumsal cinsiyet ve tarih yazımına değinilirken, eleştirmenlerce çoğunlukla göz ardı edilen klasik felsefi bir çerçeve tartışmaya dâhil edilmektedir. Sonuç olarak makale, The Crown dizisinin yalnızca çağdaş monarşi ve modernlik kaygılarını yansıttığını değil, aynı zamanda Nietzscheci anlamda bir televizyon trajedisi sunduğunu ve biçim ile kaos, disiplin ile arzu arasında sürdürülen kırılgan bir dengeyi sahnelediğini öne sürmektedir. Elizabeth ve Margaret’in Apolloncu ve Dionysosçu ilkeler aracılığıyla okunması, medya çalışmaları, kültürel kuram ve klasik felsefenin modern yansımaları alanlarına özgün bir katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Albayrak, G. (2025). THE CLASH BETWEEN PRIDE AND JOY, FORM AND ECSTACY IN THE CROWN: APOLLONIAN ELIZABETH AND DIONYSIAN MARGARET. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 65 Sayı: 2, 1407–1440. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2025.65.2.25

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Aldrich, R. J., & Cormac, R. (2021). The Secret Royals: Spying and the Crown, from Victoria to Diana. London: Atlantic Books.
  2. Arias, R. M. (2021, January 21). The Crown Offers a Compelling Historical Narrative. The Stanford Daily. https://www.stanforddaily.com/2021/01/21/the-crown-offers-acompelling- historical-narrative/
  3. Aronson, T. (1997). Princess Margaret: A Biography. London: Michael O’Mara Books.
  4. Bagehot, W. (2009). The English Constitution (P. Smith, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1867)
  5. Birler, Ö., & Türk, D. (2022). Contemporary Tragedies: A Political Glance to the Cinemas of Farhadi and Lanthimos. Ankara University İLEF Journal, 9(1), 175– 202. https://doi.org/10.24955/ilef.1000077.
  6. Burnham, D., & Jesinghausen, M. (2010). Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy: A Reader’s Guide. London and New York: Continuum.
  7. Clancy, L., & De Benedictis, S. (2021). ‘I Wanted to Offer My Sympathy. Woman to Woman’: Reading The Crown during a Conjuncture of Crisis. Soundings, 79, 122–33. https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.79.08.2021
  8. Coghlan, J., Hackett, L. J., & Nolan, H. (2025). The British Royals in Popular Culture: From the Tudors to the Windsors. London: Routledge.
  9. Daniels, P. R. (2013). Nietzsche and The Birth of Tragedy. London: Routledge.
  10. Eagleton, T. (2003). Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. Gambarato, R. R., & Heuman, J. (2023). Beyond Fact and Fiction: Cultural Memory and Transmedia Ethics in Netflix’s The Crown. European Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494221128332
  12. Geuss, R. (1999). Introduction. In F. Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings (R. Geuss & R. Speirs, Eds.; R. Speirs, Trans., pp. xiii–xxx). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Goldhill, S. (1997). Modern Critical Approaches to Greek Tragedy. In P. E. Easterling (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy (pp. 324–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Halleran, M. R. (2005). Tragedy in Performance. In R. Bushnell (Ed.), A Companion to Tragedy (pp. 198–214). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  15. Hardman, R. (2022). Queen of Our Times: The Life of Elizabeth II. London: Macmillan.
  16. Kark, R. and Cohen, B. S. (2024). The Crown Must Always Win: Rethinking Authentic Leadership through The Crown Series. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(6), 1699–1727. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.70
  17. Lacey, R. (2017). The Crown: The Official Companion, Volume 1: Elizabeth II, Winston Churchill, and the Making of a Young Queen (1947–1955). London: Blink Publishing.
  18. Lacey, R. (2019, November 17). How The Crown Has Changed the World’s View of the Royals. BBC Culture. https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20191117-how-the-crown-haschanged- the-worlds-view-of-the-royals.
  19. Lenson, D. (1987). The Birth of Tragedy: A Commentary. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
  20. Morgan, P. (Executive producer & writer). (2016). The Crown (Season 1) [TV Series]. Left Bank Pictures; Sony Pictures Television.
  21. Morgan, P. (Executive producer & writer). (2017). The Crown. (Season 2) [TV Series]. Left Bank Pictures; Sony Pictures Television.
  22. Morton, A. (2021). Elizabeth & Margaret: The Intimate World of the Windsor Sisters. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
  23. Nietzsche, F. (1999). The Birth of Tragedy (R. Geuss & R. Speirs, Eds.; R. Speirs, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Otto, W. F. (1965). Dionysus: Myth and Cult (R. B. Palmer, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  25. Pimlott, B. (1996). The Queen: A Biography of Elizabeth II. London: HarperCollins.
  26. Poole, A. (2005). Tragedy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Porter, J. I. (2005). Nietzsche and Tragedy. In R. Bushnell (Ed.), A Companion to Tragedy (pp. 25–38). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  28. Seaford, R. (2005). Tragedy and Dionysus. In R. Bushnell (Ed.), A Companion to Tragedy (pp. 39–54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  29. Singh, A. (2015). £100m Netflix Series Recreates Royal Wedding. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11813 152/100m-Netflix-series-recreates-royal-wedding.html.
  30. Clancy, L., & De Benedictis, S. (2021). ‘I Wanted to Offer My Sympathy. Woman to Woman’: Reading The Crown during a Conjuncture of Crisis. Soundings, 79, 122–33. https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.79.08.2021