SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 21

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE AND SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM NON-FINANCIAL FIRMS IN THE BIST 50

KURUMSAL AÇIKLAMALAR VE KISA VADELI FINANSAL PERFORMANS: BIST 50 ENDEKSI’NDE YER ALAN FINANSAL OLMAYAN FIRMALARDAN KANITLAR

Ümran Bulut Su0000-0002-9451-711X
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2026-01-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the findings suggest that ESG disclosures may not be automatically associated with increased profitability in the short term, and that the relationship may be sensitive to contextual factors such as the information environment, time horizon, and firm-specific dynamics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures and short-term accounting-based financial performance in non-financial firms listed on the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 50 Index, using return on assets (ROA) as an indicator, within an exploratory framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Initially, 40 firms were included in the analysis using data from 2019–2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the findings suggest that ESG disclosures may not be automatically associated with increased profitability in the short term, and that the relationship may be sensitive to contextual factors such as the information environment, time horizon, and firm-specific dynamics.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2019–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ESG Açıklaması · Finansal Performans · ROA.

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures and short-term accounting-based financial performance in non-financial firms listed on the Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 50 Index, using return on assets (ROA) as an indicator, within an exploratory framework. Initially, 40 firms were included in the analysis using data from 2019–2023. Due to the limited number of firms without ESG disclosures, a matching process based on sector, firm size, and financial leverage criteria was implemented to increase comparability, resulting in a final sample of 12 firms (6 with ESG disclosures and 6 without). ESG disclosure was defined as a binary (dummy) variable, and ROA was used as the financial performance indicator. Univariate analyses show that firms with ESG disclosures have higher average ROA levels. However, multiple regression analyses performed when liquidity, financial leverage, firm size, and sector differences are controlled for indicate that ESG disclosure does not produce a statistically significant and consistent effect on ROA. Overall, the findings suggest that ESG disclosures may not be automatically associated with increased profitability in the short term, and that the relationship may be sensitive to contextual factors such as the information environment, time horizon, and firm-specific dynamics.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Borsa İstanbul (BIST) 50 Endeksi’nde yer alan finansal olmayan firmalarda çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim (ESG) açıklamaları ile kısa vadeli muhasebe temelli finansal performans arasındaki ilişkiyi, aktif kârlılığı (ROA) göstergesi üzerinden keşifsel bir çerçevede incelemektedir. 2019–2023 dönemine ait veriler kullanılarak başlangıçta 40 firma analiz kapsamına alınmıştır. ESG açıklaması yapmayan firma sayısının sınırlı olması nedeniyle karşılaştırılabilirliği artırmak amacıyla sektör, firma büyüklüğü ve finansal kaldıraç kriterlerine dayalı bir eşleştirme gerçekleştirilmiş ve nihai örneklem 12 firmadan (6 ESG açıklaması yapan ve 6 yapmayan) oluşturulmuştur. ESG açıklaması ikili (kukla) değişken olarak tanımlanmış, finansal performans göstergesi olarak ROA kullanılmıştır. Tek değişkenli analizler, ESG açıklaması yapan firmaların ortalama ROA düzeylerinin daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak likidite, finansal kaldıraç, firma büyüklüğü ve sektör farklılıkları kontrol edildiğinde gerçekleştirilen çoklu regresyon analizleri, ESG açıklamasının ROA üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve tutarlı bir etki üretmediğine işaret etmektedir. Genel olarak bulgular, ESG açıklamalarının kısa vadede otomatik bir kârlılık artışıyla ilişkilendirilemeyebileceğini ve ilişkinin bilgi ortamı, zaman ufku ve firma-özel dinamikler gibi bağlamsal unsurlara duyarlı olabileceğini düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Su, Ü. B. (2026). CORPORATE DISCLOSURE AND SHORT-TERM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM NON-FINANCIAL FIRMS IN THE BIST 50. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 21, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/1564117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
  2. Andika, C. (2025). ESG integration in financial accounting: Comparative evidence and policy implications. Sinergi International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v3i3.863
  3. Arayssi, M., & Dah, M. (2016). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: The case of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 6(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v6i2.10261
  4. Bahadır, O., & Akarsu, S. (2024). Does company information environment affect ESG–financial performance relationship? Evidence from European markets. Sustainability, 16(7), 2701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072701
  5. Baran, M., Kuźniarska, A., Makieła, Z., Sławik, A., & Stuss, M. M. (2022). Does ESG reporting relate to corporate financial performance in the context of the energy sector transformation? Evidence from Poland. Energies, 15(2), 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020477
  6. Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/344114
  7. Cai, W., Bai, M., & Davey, H. (2024). Mandatory environmental disclosure policy in the largest carbon emission country. Pacific Accounting Review, 36(5), 527–560. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-04-2023-0055
  8. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
  9. Demirgüneş, K. (2008). The relationship between liquidity and profitability: An empirical study on the Turkish retail industry. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 63(4), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n4p63
  10. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
  11. Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x
  12. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.002
  13. European Commission. (2022). Corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD). https://finance.ec.europa.eu.
  14. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
  15. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x
  16. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
  17. Fu, T., & Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: The moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, Article 1256052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052
  18. Gholami, A., Sands, J., & Rahman, H. U. (2022). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and value generation: Is the financial industry different? Sustainability, 14(5), 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052647
  19. Gitman, L. J. (2009). Principles of managerial finance (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
  20. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
  21. Hussain, M., Alsayegh, M., & Boshnak, H. (2024). The impact of ESG disclosure on firm performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(17), 7660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177660
  22. Iqbal, M. (2023). ESG score and firm performance: Study of environmentally sensitive companies in emerging markets. Ekspektra, 7(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.25139/ekt.v7i2.6385
  23. Jasni, N., & Zulkifli, A. (2024). The moderating role of sector risk in the ESG–financial performance relationship. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i2.672
  24. Kalani, R., Sengupta, A., & Didwania, M. (2024). The impact of ESG techniques on ROIC and EPS. Migration Letters, 21(S6), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21iS6.7920
  25. Koundouri, P., Pittis, N., & Plataniotis, A. (2022). The impact of ESG performance on financial performance. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 15(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015013
  26. Li, W., Mei, M., Yu, X., Wang, J. J., & Geng, T. (2024). How does ESG performance impact corporate financing costs? Journal of Systems Science and Information, 12(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2023-0054
  27. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
  28. Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x
  29. Penman, S. H. (2013). Financial statement analysis and security valuation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  30. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053
  31. Rahman, R. A., & Alsayegh, M. F. (2021). Determinants of ESG reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040167
  32. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
  33. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2016). Fundamentals of corporate finance (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  34. Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2020). Financial materiality in sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2657
  35. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
  36. Wijaya, H. D., & Iryanto, B. W. (2024). CSR and ESG disclosure on profitability. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(11), 2828–2844. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i11.1490
  37. Zhou, Y. (2025). When ESG meets shareholder value. Systems, 13(5), Article 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050315