SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Anger among Young Drivers: A Qualitative Study

Genç Sürücülerde Öfke Deneyimleri: Bir Nitel Analiz Çalışması

Uluğhan Ergin(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4959-8942
Gizem Fındık(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8245-6324
Bahar Öz(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5440-0948
Pages
1–27
Publication Date
2020-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To examine the relationship between themes, code co-occurrence model of MAXQDA software was used and the revealed affiliations were discussed through theories and phenomena of social psychology literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traffic system, which includes human factors, is an open system that drivers can experience the emotion of anger through either dangerous driving experiences or interactions with other road users.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is a qualitative study that have analyzed the transcriptions of 7 male and 7 female participants, 14 in total, which their transcriptions have been acquired through interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To examine the relationship between themes, code co-occurrence model of MAXQDA software was used and the revealed affiliations were discussed through theories and phenomena of social psychology literature.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:genç sürücüler · öfke · sürücülük öfkesi

Abstract

Traffic system, which includes human factors, is an open system that drivers can experience the emotion of anger through either dangerous driving experiences or interactions with other road users. The state of anger that could be observed especially within young driver group, predicts various driving related variables from risk perception to aberrant driving. The main aim of this research is to extensively examine the anger of young driver group as a result of their experiences within traffic. For that purpose, participants were asked to recall a traffic experience that caused them to feel profound anger, and they were asked certain questions related to their specific memory. This study is a qualitative study that have analyzed the transcriptions of 7 male and 7 female participants, 14 in total, which their transcriptions have been acquired through interviews. In this study, Thematic Analysis is preferred and the analysis revealed four themes and fifteen subthemes. Related with the theme of “The Reason of the Incident”, “Intentional Behaviors”, “Individual Characteristics”, “Interactive and Changeable Traffic System”, “Inattentiveness” and “Female Driver” were revealed. Related with “Emotions Felt”, “Anger”, “Frustration”, “Fear”, “Responsibility for Others” and “Long-term Emotional Effects” were revealed. While the theme of “The Main Source of Anger” stands on its own, the last theme, “Reactions after the Incident”, have revealed the subthemes of “Constructive Approach”, “Retaliation”, “Reactions through Gestures and Facial Expressions”, “Communicating through Vehicle” and “Coping”. To examine the relationship between themes, code co-occurrence model of MAXQDA software was used and the revealed affiliations were discussed through theories and phenomena of social psychology literature.

Özet

İnsan faktörünü de içerisinde barındıran trafik sistemi, sürücülerin gerek yaşadıkları tehlikeleri olaylarla gerekse diğer yol kullanıcılarıyla olan etkileşimleriyle öfke duygusunu deneyimleyebildikleri açık bir sistemdir. Özellikle genç sürücü grubunda daha yaygın gözlemlenebilen bu öfke durumu, risk algısından sapkın sürücülüğe kadar birçok değişken üzerinde belirleyici rol oynamaktadır. Bu araştırmanın temel hedefi, genç sürücü grubunun trafikte yaşadığı olaylar sonucunda hissettiği öfkeyi derinlemesine incelemektir. Bunun için katılımcılara şiddetli bir şekilde öfkelendikleri bir trafik olayını anımsamaları istenmiş, bu anıya yönelik çeşitli sorular yöneltilmiştir. Bu çalışma, nitel bir çalışma olup, 7 erkek ve 7 kadın katılımcıdan oluşan, toplamda 14 kişiyle yapılan mülakatlar sonucu elde edilen metinlerin analiziyle oluşturulmuştur. Çalışmada Tematik Analiz yöntemi tercih edilmiş ve analizin sonucunda toplamda dört üst tema ile on beş alt tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar: “Olayın Nedeni” üst temasına bağlı “Niyetli Davranışlar”, “Bireysel Özellikler”, “Etkileşimli ve Değişken Trafik Sistemi”, “Dikkatsizlik” ve “Kadın Sürücü”; “Hissedilen Duygular” üst temasına bağlı “Öfke”, “Sinir Bozukluğu”, “Korku”, “Başkalarına Karşı Sorumluluk” ve “Uzun Süreli Duygusal Etkiler”; “Öfkenin Esas Kaynağı” üst teması ve son olarak “Olay Sonrası Tepkiler” üst temasına bağlı “Alttan Alma”, “Misilleme”, “Jest ve Mimiklerle Gösterilen Tepkiler”, “Araç Aracılığıyla İletişim Kurma” ve “Başa Çıkma” alt temalarıdır. Temaların birbiri ile ilişkisini incelemek adına MAXQDA yazılımının Kod Birlikte Oluşma Modeli kullanılmış olup, ortaya çıkan ilişkiler sosyal psikoloji alanyazınında mevcut kuramlar ve olgular ışığında ele alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ergin, U., Fındık, G., Öz, B. (2020). Anger among Young Drivers: A Qualitative Study. Trafik ve Ulaşım Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.38002/tuad.631087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (69)

  1. Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J. ve Campbell, W. K. (2000). Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence result from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism? Current Directions in Psychological Science. 9(1), 26–29, doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00053
  2. Berdoulat, E., Vavassori, D. ve Sastre, M. T. M. (2013). Driving anger, emotional and instrumental aggressiveness, and impulsiveness in the prediction of aggressive and transgressive driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.029
  3. Bıçaksız, P. ve Özkan, T. (2016). Impulsivity and driver behaviors, offences and accident involvement: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 38, 194-223, doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.06.001
  4. Bogdan, S. R., Măirean, C. ve Havârneanu, C. E. (2016a). A meta-analysis of the association between anger and aggressive driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 350-364, doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.009
  5. Bogdan, S. R., Măirean, C. ve Havârneanu, C. E. (2016b). A meta-analysis of the association between anger and aggressive driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 350–364. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.009
  6. Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  7. Britt, T. W. ve Garrity, M. J. (2003). An integrative model of road rage. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 16(3), 53–79.
  8. Burton, D. (2008). Cross-Cultural Marketing: Theory, Practice and Relevance. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  9. Buscher, D. ve Quick, D. (2004). Masculinities: male roles and male involvement in the promotion of gender equality: a resource packet. New York: Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children.
  10. Bushman, B. J. ve Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened Egotism, Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Direct and Displaced Aggression: Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Lead to Violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.219
  11. Bushman, B. J., Steffgen, G., Kerwin, T., Whitlock, T. ve Weisenberger, J. M. (2018). “Don’t you know I own the road?” The link between narcissism and aggressive driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 52, 14-20. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2017.10.008
  12. Chatterjee, S., Gao, X., Sarkar, S. ve Uzmanoğlu, C. (2019). Reacting to the scope of a data breach: The differential role of fear and anger. Journal of Business Research, 101, 183-193. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.024
  13. Crocker, J. ve Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 598-623. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
  14. Dahlen, E. R., Martin, R. C., Ragan, K. ve Kuhlman, M. M. (2005). Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(2), 341-348. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006
  15. Dahlen, E. R. ve Ragan, K. M. (2004). Validation of the propensity for angry driving scale. Journal of Safety Research, 35(5), 557-563. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2004.09.002
  16. Dahlen, E. R. ve White, R. P. (2006). The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 903-915. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.016
  17. Deffenbacher, J. L., Deffenbacher, D. M., Lynch, R. S. ve Richards, T. L. (2003). Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: A comparison of high and low anger drivers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(6), 701-718. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00046-3
  18. Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R. ve Swaim, R. C. (2002). The Driving Anger Expression Inventory: A measure of how people express their anger on the road. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 717-737. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00063-8
  19. Demir, B., Demir, S. ve Özkan, T. (2016). A contextual model of driving anger: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 332-349. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.020
  20. Eatough, V. ve Smith, J. (2006). “I was like a wild wild person”: Understanding feelings of anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 483-498. doi:10.1348/000712606X97831
  21. Eşiyok, B., Yasak, Y. ve Korkusuz, I. (2007). Anger expression on the road: Validity and reliability of the driving anger expression inventory. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 18(3), 231-243.
  22. Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R. ve Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1013-1034. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0393
  23. Fındık, G., Uslu, İ., Öz, B., Lajunen, T., Özkan, T. (2015). Sürdürülebilir ulaşım için yol ve trafik güvenliği ulusal kongresi bildiri kitabı. Orman, A., Özgür, O., Soydan, A.G., Can, K., Uluçay, G., Gürler, H., Kokol, N. (Ed.) Sürdürülebilir ulaşım için yol ve trafik güvenliği ulusal kongresi içinde (s. 136 – 142). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi
  24. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C. ve Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10Year Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199-216. doi:10.1111/spc3.12018
  25. Glick, P. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, power distance, and gender inequality across cultures. S. Guimond (Ed.), Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations, and Culture içinde (s. 283-302). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511584329.015
  26. González-Iglesias, B., Gómez-Fraguela, J. A. ve Luengo-Martín, M. Á. (2012). Driving anger and traffic violations: Gender differences. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4), 404-412. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.002
  27. Harvey, J. H., Town, J. P. ve Yarkin, K. L. (1981). How fundamental is “the fundamental attribution error”? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 346-349. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.346
  28. Hennessy, D. A. (2016). Are narcissists really angrier drivers? An examination of state driving anger among narcissistic subtypes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 267-275. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.025
  29. Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81-99. doi:10.1007/BF01733682
  30. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  31. Hofstede, G. ve Bond, M. H. (1984). The need for synergy among cross-cultural studies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417-33. doi:10.1177/0022002184015004003
  32. Hofstede, G. H. (2001), Culture’s Consequences, Second Edition: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. London, England: Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks.
  33. Horvath, S. ve Morf, C. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1252-1258. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.011
  34. Huang, P. ve Winston, F. K. (2011). Young drivers. B.E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of Traffic Psychology içinde (s. 315-338). London; Waltham, MA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10023-2
  35. Jones, D. N. ve Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360-364. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021
  36. Jones, E. E. ve Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution proces in social psychology. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology içinde (s. 219-266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  37. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
  38. Lajunen, T., Parker, D. ve Stradling, S. G. (1998). Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 1(2), 107-121. doi:10.1016/S1369-8478(98)00009-6
  39. Lonczak, H. S., Neighbors, C. ve Donovan, D. M. (2007). Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(3), 536-545. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.010
  40. Lu, J., Xie, X. ve Zhang, R. (2013). Focusing on appraisals: How and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception. Journal of Safety Research, 45, 65-73. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.009
  41. Lustman, M., Wiesenthal, D. L. ve Flett, G. L. (2010). Narcissism and aggressive driving: Is an inflated view of the self a road Hazard? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1423-1449. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00624.x
  42. Moè, A., Cadinu, M. ve Maass, A. (2015). Women drive better if not stereotyped. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 85, 199-206. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.021
  43. Neighbors, C., Vietor, N. A. ve Raymond Knee, C. (2002). A motivational model of driving anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 324-335. doi:10.1177/0146167202286004
  44. Newcomb, T. ve Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. American Sociological Review, 23(6), 742-743. doi:10.2307/2089062
  45. Parkinson, B. (2001). Anger on and off the road. British Journal of Psychology. 92(3), 507-526. doi:10.1348/000712601162310
  46. Paulhus, D. L. ve Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 92(3), 507-526. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
  47. Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., Hosie, J. A. ve Milne, A. B. (2006). Age, anger regulation and well-being. Aging and Mental Health, 10(3), 250-256. doi:10.1080/13607860500310385
  48. Porter, B. E. (2011). Handbook of Traffic Psychology (1st Ed.). London; Waltham, MA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-01975-8
  49. Precht, L., Keinath, A. ve Krems, J. F. (2017). Effects of driving anger on driver behavior – Results from naturalistic driving data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 45, 75-92. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.019
  50. Robins, R. W., Spranca, M. D. ve Mendelsohn, G. A. (1996). The Actor-Observer Effect Revisited: Effects of Individual Differences and Repeated Social Interactions on Actor and Observer Attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 375. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.375-389
  51. Roidl, E., Frehse, B. ve Höger, R. (2014). Emotional states of drivers and the impact on speed, acceleration and traffic violations - A simulator study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 70, 282-292. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.010
  52. Solmazer, G., Üzumcüoğlu, Y. ve Özkan, T. (2016). The role of traffic law enforcements in the relationship between cultural variables and traffic fatality rates across some countries of the world. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 38, 137-150. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2016.01.001
  53. Steele, C. M. ve Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
  54. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J. ve Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
  55. Steinhauser, K., Leist, F., Maier, K., Michel, V., Pärsch, N., Rigley, P., … Steinhauser, M. (2018). Effects of emotions on driving behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 150-163. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.012
  56. Sümer, N., Tümer, B., Ergin, U. ve Şahin, S. M. (2019). Dark personality and road crashes: mediating role of driver vengeance and violations. The 10th International Driving Symposium (DA2019). The Eldorado Hotel in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
  57. Taylor, S. E. ve Koivumaki, J. H. (1976). The perception of self and others: Acquaintanceship, affect, and actor-observer differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 403. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.403
  58. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(3), 227-236. doi:10.2307/3033683
  59. Özkan, T., ve Lajunen, T. (2011). Person and environment: Traffic culture. B. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology içinde (s. 179–192). London; Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
  60. Özkan, T., ve Lajunen, T. (2015). A general traffic (Safety) culture system (G-TraSaCuS). TraSaCu Project, European Commission, RISE Programme.
  61. Vallières, E. F., Vallerand, R. J., Bergeron, J. ve Mcduff, P. (2014). Intentionality, anger, coping, and ego defensiveness in reactive aggressive driving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(5), 354-363. doi:10.1111/jasp.12228
  62. Weiner, B. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573 doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
  63. Weiner, B. (2005). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions: An attributional approach. Mahwah: New Jersey: Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781410615749
  64. Wickens, C. M., Roseborough, J. E. W., Hall, A. ve Wiesenthal, D. L. (2013). Anger-provoking events in driving diaries: A content analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 19, 108-120. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.02.002
  65. Wickens, C. M., Wiesenthal, D. L., Flora, D. B. ve Flett, G. L. (2011). Understanding Driver Anger and Aggression: Attributional Theory in the Driving Environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 354-370. doi:10.1037/a0025815
  66. Wickens, C. M., Wiesenthal, D. L. ve Roseborough, J. E. W. (2015). Personality Predictors of Driver Vengeance. Violence and Victims, 30(1), 148-162. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00111
  67. Yang, Q., Zhao, D., Wu, Y., Tang, P., Gu, R. ve Luo, Y. jia. (2018). Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making. Physiology and Behavior, 184, 179-188. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.11.028
  68. Yeung, N. C. J. ve von Hippel, C. (2008). Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 667-674. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.003
  69. Zhang, T. ve Chan, A. H. S. (2016). The association between driving anger and driving outcomes: A meta-analysis of evidence from the past twenty years. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 90, 50-62. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.009