SavedAdd your journal

Journals / OHS ACADEMY / 2021 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Occupational Health and Safety Risk Analysis in Trout Aquaculture Facility

Alabalık Yetiştiricilik Tesislerinde İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Risk Analizi

Mert Minaz(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AQUACULTURE)0000-0003-1894-9807
Kübra Ak(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AQUACULTURE)0000-0001-6809-2659
İlker Zeki Kurtoğlu(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AQUACULTURE)0000-0002-4214-7997
Pages
14–21
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The lowest risk averages for case scenarios collected in 4 clusters according to processes are dining hall and locker rooms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aquaculture sector, which responds to alternative food supply, continues to grow exponentially with each passing day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current study focused on case scenarios that may occur in an integrated trout farming facility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The lowest risk averages for case scenarios collected in 4 clusters according to processes are dining hall and locker rooms.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:alabalık çiftliği · iş sağlığı ve güvenliği · risk değerlendirmesi

Abstract

The aquaculture sector, which responds to alternative food supply, continues to grow exponentially with each passing day. For this reason, there is a need for manpower to meet the increasing workload in aqua-culture facilities. As in every sector, occupational health and safety is quite important for employees in aquaculture. The current study focused on case scenarios that may occur in an integrated trout farming facility. Expert opinions for a total of 79 different case scenarios were evaluated. The case scenarios ana-lyzed with the 5x5 matrix method showed that high-risk cases can occur in the facility-wide, culture tanks, toilets and feed storage. The highest number of risks for all case scenarios is in the medium risk category. In the medium risk category, there is a potential for employees to encounter consequences such as death and loss of limbs, especially if the case scenarios foreseen for the facility are realized. The lowest risk averages for case scenarios collected in 4 clusters according to processes are dining hall and locker rooms.

Özet

Alternatif gıda arzına cevap veren su ürünleri sektörü her geçen gün katlanarak büyümeye devam etmekte-dir. Bu nedenle su ürünleri yetiştiricilik tesislerinde artan iş yükünü karşılayacak insan gücüne ihtiyaç vardır. Her sektörde olduğu gibi su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde de çalışanlar için iş sağlığı ve güvenliği olduk-ça önemlidir. Mevcut çalışma, entegre bir alabalık yetiştirme tesisinde meydana gelebilecek vaka senaryo-larına odaklanmıştır. Bu kapsamda toplam 79 farklı vaka senaryosu için uzman görüşleri değerlendirilmiş-tir. 5x5 matris yöntemi ile analiz edilen vaka senaryoları, tesis genelinde, kültür tanklarında, tuvaletlerde ve yem depolarında yüksek riskli vakaların oluşabileceğini göstermiştir. Tüm vaka senaryolarında en fazla risk sayısı orta risk kategorisinde gözlenmiştir. Orta risk kategorisinde, özellikle tesis için öngörülen vaka senaryolarının gerçekleşmesi durumunda çalışanların ölüm ve uzuv kaybı gibi sonuçlarla karşılaşma olası-lığı bulunmaktadır. Proseslere göre 4 kümede toplanan vaka senaryoları için en düşük risk ortalamaları yemekhane ve soyunma odalarıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Minaz, M., Ak, K., Kurtoğlu, İ. Z. (2021). Occupational Health and Safety Risk Analysis in Trout Aquaculture Facility. OHS ACADEMY, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.38213/ohsacademy.989585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Ahmed, N., Thompson, S., & Glaser, M. (2019). “Global Aquaculture Productivity, Environmental Sustainabil-ity, and Climate Change Adaptability”. Environmental Management, 63(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1117-3
  2. Aydoğan, Ö. (2020). “Su Ürünleri Sektöründe Karşılaşılan İş Hastalıkları ve Meslek Hastalıkları Occupational Diseases Encountered in Fishery Sector”. Karaelmas Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 4(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.33720/kisgd.558324
  3. Cavalli, L. S., Marques, F. B., & Watterson, A. (2020). “A critical overview of work-related injury and illness in aquaculture workers from Brazil”. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(2), 1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12377
  4. Cole, D. W., Cole, R., Gaydos, S. J., Gray, J., Hyland, G., Jacques, M. L., Powell-Dunford, N., Sawhney, C., & Au, W. W. (2009). “Aquaculture: Environmental, toxicological, and health issues”. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 212(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2008.08.003
  5. FAO. (2018). “The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals”. www.fao.org/publications
  6. FAO. (2020). “The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action”. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
  7. Güner, E. D. (2018). “Environmental risk assessment for biological wastewater treatment plant”, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(3), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2017.16023
  8. Gutierrez-Wing, M. T., & Malone, R. F. (2006). “Biological filters in aquaculture: Trends and research directions for freshwater and marine applications”, Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.003
  9. Kılkıs, I. (2013). “İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği’nde Yeni Dönem: 6331 Sayılı İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Kanunu (İSGK)”, “İş,Güç” Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 15(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.4026/1303-2860.2013.0217.x
  10. Marques, F. B., Bettoni, G. N., Santos, B. G. T., Adeoye, A. A., Brito, B. G., Brito, K. C. T., Buketov, K., Cazella, S., Fermino, M. H., Hellebrandt, L., Jeebhay, M., Mitchell, R., Ngajilo, D., Watterson, A., & Cavalli, L. S. (2020). “AquaSafe: Aquaculture occupational safety and health in the palm of your hand”, Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, 26(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.36812/pag.202026146-54
  11. Matos, J., Costa, S., Rodrigues, A., Pereira, R., & Sousa Pinto, I. (2006). “Experimental integrated aquaculture of fish and red seaweeds in Northern Portugal”, Aquaculture, 252(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.047
  12. McGuinness, E., Aasjord, H. L., Utne, I. B., & Holmen, I. M. (2013). “Fatalities in the Norwegian fishing fleet 1990-2011”, Safety Science, 57, 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.009
  13. Mert, B., & Ercan, P. (2014). “Su Ürünleri Sektöründe İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilme-si”, TUBAV Bilim Dergisi, 7(4), 16–27. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200983
  14. Moreau, D. T. R., & Neis, B. (2009). “Occupational health and safety hazards in Atlantic Canadian aquacul-ture: Laying the groundwork for prevention”, Marine Policy, 33(2), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.09.001
  15. Myers, M.L. (2011), Reducing Hazards in the Work Environment. In R. Friis & C. Friis (Eds.), The Praeger Handbook of Environmental Health. Praeger. https://products.abc-clio.com/abc-cliocorporate/product.aspx?pc=A3038C
  16. Myers, Melvin L., & Durborow, R. M. (2012), Aquacultural Safety and Health. In E. Carvalho (Ed.), Health and Environment in Aquaculture (pp. 385–400). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/29258
  17. Ngajilo, D., & Jeebhay, M. F. (2019). “Occupational injuries and diseases in aquaculture – A review of litera-ture”, Aquaculture, 507, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.03.053
  18. Özgür, C. (2021). “Dezenfeksiyon ünitesi risk analizi: içme suyu arıtma tesisi”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.741014
  19. Tadesse, T., & Admassu, M. (2006). Occupational Health and Safety (No. 663-A-00-00-0358–00). https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/health/ephti/library/lecture_notes/env_occupational_health_students/ln_occ_health_safety_final.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2021)
  20. Valderrama, D., Hishamunda, N., & Zhou, X. (2010). “Estimating Employment in World Aquaculture”, FAO Aquaculture Newsletter, 24–25. http://www.fao.org/3/al363e/al363e.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.06.2021)
  21. Waite, R., Beveridge, M., Brummett, R., Castine, S., Chaiyawannakarn, N., Kaushik, S., Mungkung, R., Na-wapakpilai, S., & Phillips, M. (2014). “Improving Productivity and Environmental Performance of Aquacul-ture”. https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/handle/20.500.12348/38 (Erişim Tarihi: 02.06.2021)
  22. World Bank. (2013). Fish to 2030: Prospects for Fisheries and Aquaculture. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/458631468152376668/pdf/831770WP0P11260ES003000Fish0to02030.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 02.06.2021)