SINIF II DİVİZYON 2 MALOKLÜZYONLU BİR ERİŞKİNİN ÇEKİMSİZ TEDAVİSİ

Key Findings & Data:The patient had class II molar and class II canine relationships, retroclined upper and lower incisors, excessive deep bite and severe crowding.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:An optimal molar and canine relationship was achieved in 14 months.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This case report describes the treatment of an adult with Class II division 2 malocclusion. The patient had class II molar and class II canine relationships, retroclined upper and lower incisors, excessive deep bite and severe crowding. The patient was treated by incisor protrusion and use of fixed functional appliance. An optimal molar and canine relationship was achieved in 14 months.

Özet

Bu olgu raporunda Sınıf II divizyon 2 maloklüzyona sahip erişkin hastanın tedavisi anlatılmaktadır. Hastada sınıf II molar ve sınıf II kanin ilişkisi, dikleşmiş üst ve alt insizörler, aşırı deep bite ve ciddi çapraşıklık bulunmaktaydı . Hastada insizör protrüzyonu ve sabit fonksiyonel aperey ile tedavi yapıldı. Optimum molar ve kanin ilişkisi 14 ayda sağlandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUNER, H. G., KOCADERELİ, İ. (2013). SINIF II DİVİZYON 2 MALOKLÜZYONLU BİR ERİŞKİNİN ÇEKİMSİZ TEDAVİSİ. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 49–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/151911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

Ast DH, Carlos JP, Cons NC. The prevalence and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in upstate New York. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 437-445
Ingervall B, Seeman L, Thilander B. Frequency of malocclusion and need of orthodontic treatment in 10-year old children in Gothenburg. Sven Tandlaek Tidskr 1972; 65: 7-21
Bishara SE. Class II Malocclusions: Diagnostic and Clinical Considerations With and Without Treatment. Semin Orthod 2006; 12: 11-24
Von Bremen J, Panscherz H. Efficiency of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Treatment in Relation to Different Treatment Approaches. Semin Orthod 2003; 9: 87-92
Asakawa S, Al-Musaallam T, Handelman CS. Nonextraction treatment of a Class II deepbite malocclusion with severe mandibular crowding: Visualized treatment objectives for selecting treatment options. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 308-316
Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: A cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 616- 625
Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II Non-Extraction Patients Treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Intermaxillary Elastics. Angle Orthodontist 2008; 78-2: 332-338
Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: A retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 552-561
Hasund A, Ulstein G. The position of incisors in relation to the lines NA and NB in different facial types. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 1-14
Riedel RA. A review of retrusion problem. Angle Orthod 1960; 30: 179-194
Chen YJ, Yao CCJ, Chang HF. Nonsurgical correction of skeletal deep overbite and Class II Division 2 malocclusion in an adult patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 371-378
Chiappone RC. Special considerations for adult orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1976; 10: 535-545
Barrer HG. The adult orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 617-640
Robb SI, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA. Effectiveness and duration of orthodontic treatment in adults and adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113: 383-386
Becker A, Chaushu S. Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orth