Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Allergic reactions seen in orthodontic treatment

Ortodontik tedavide karşılaşılan allerjik reaksiyonlar

Pages
47–54
Publication Date
2016-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review was to evaluate the allergic reactions seen in orthodontic patients and discuss the cautions that orthodontists can take.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Allergy can be defined as inappropriate and harmful response to harmless and ordinary materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Allergic reactions, like in other fields of dentistry, can also be seen in the field of orthodontics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review was to evaluate the allergic reactions seen in orthodontic patients and discuss the cautions that orthodontists can take.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Allerjik reaksiyon · dental materyaller · ortodonti

Abstract

Allergy can be defined as inappropriate and harmful response to harmless and ordinary materials. Allergic reactions, like in other fields of dentistry, can also be seen in the field of orthodontics. The reactions that occur against orthodontic materials can be seen as irritant or hypersensitivity reactions. The main reason of the irritant reactions is friction between soft tissues and orthodontic appliances. However, the reason of the hypersensitivity reactions is usually the antigenicity of the materials. Hypersensitivity reactions are usually seen as allergic contact dermatitis on face and neck; the occurrence of mucosal-gingival reactions and dermal and systemic reactions are rare. Latex, metal and acrylic resins are the most common allergens in orthodontics. Apart from these materials, allergic reactions can occur against bonding materials, extraoral appliances, disinfectants and antimicrobial agents. The reactions that occur against extraoral appliances usually result from metallic and elastic parts of the appliances or the appliance parts that are in contact with skin. Orthodontists should be aware of the allergic reactions to protect their patients’ health. The aim of this review was to evaluate the allergic reactions seen in orthodontic patients and discuss the cautions that orthodontists can take.

Özet

Allerji, normalde zararsız olan maddelere karşı oluşan uygunsuz ve zararlı bir cevap olarak tanımlanabilir. Diş hekimliğinin bütün alanlarında olduğu gibi ortodontide de allerjik reaksiyonlarla sıklıkla karşılaşılmaktadır. Ortodontik materyallere karşı istenmeyen hasta reaksiyonları hem irritan hem de hipersensitivite reaksiyonları şeklinde görülebilmektedir. İrritan orijinli reaksiyonlar yumuşak dokular ve ortodontik aparey kısımları arasındaki direkt sürtünmeden kaynaklanmaktadır. Hipersensitivite reaksiyonları ise bazı materyallerin antijenitesine bağlıdır ve istenmeyen hasta cevabıyla sonuçlanmaktadır. Hipersensitivite reaksiyonları genelde yüz ve boyunda allerjik kontakt dermatit olarak kendini gösterse de, mukozal ve gingival reaksiyonlar, potansiyel genel dermal ve sistemik reaksiyonlar da nadir olarak görülebilmektedir. Ortodontik tedavide en sık karşılaşılan allerjik reaksiyonlar lateks, metal ve akrilik rezin kaynaklıdır. Bu materyallerin dışında braketlerin yapıştırılmasında kullanılan bonding ajanlarına, ekstraoral apareylere, dezenfektanlarave antimikrobial ajanlarakarşı allerjik reaksiyonlar gelişebilmektedir. Ekstraoral apareyler nedeniyle oluşan reaksiyonlar apareylerin metalik, elastik kısımlarına veya doku ile temasta olan aparey parçalarına bağlı olarak gelişebilmektedir. Ortodontistlerin uygulanan tedavi sırasında allerjik reaksiyonlar açısından dikkatli olması, hastanın genel sağlığının korunması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı, ortodontik tedavi sırasında sıklıkla karşılaşılan allerjik reaksiyonları incelemek ve hekimin alabileceği önlemleri tartışmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Coşkuner, H. G., Kocadereli, İ. (2016). Allergic reactions seen in orthodontic treatment. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 47–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/265291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Dickson G. Contact dermatitis and cervical head-gear. Br Dent J 1983;155:112. Brooks MH, Curzon MG. 'Orthodontic headgear related to allergic contact dermatitis'. Br Dent J 1991;171:124. Lowey MN. Allergic contact dermatitis associated with the use of an Interlandi headgear in a patient with a history of atopy. Br Dent J 1993;175:67-72.
  2. Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Changes in occupational health problems and adverse patient reactions in orthodontics from 1987 to 2000. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:591-8.
  3. Kanerva L, Lahtinen A, Toikkanen J, Forss H, Estlander T, Susitaival P, et al. Increase in occupational skin diseases of dental personnel. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:104-8.
  4. Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Occupational health problems and adverse patient reactions in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:254-64.
  5. Paredes V, Paredes C. Allergic contact dermatitis associated with the use of facemask on a patient with a history of atopy. J Dent Child (Chic) 2010;77:177-9.
  6. Rai R, Dinakar D, Kurian SS, Bindoo YA. Investigation of contact allergy to dental materials by patch testing. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014;5:282-6.
  7. Rubel DM, Watchorn RB. Allergic contact dermatitis in dentistry. Australas J Dermatol 2000;41:63-9. Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Invest 2008;12:1-8.
  8. Lunder T, Rogl-Butina M. Chronic urticaria from an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:232-3.
  9. Ruiz-Genao DP, Moreno de Vega MJ, Sánchez Pérez J, GarcíaDíez A. Labial edema due to an acrylic dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:273-4.
  10. Giunta J, Zablotsky N. Allergic stomatitis caused by self-polymerizing resin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 1976;41:631-7.
  11. McCabe JF, Basker RM. Tissue sensitivity to acrylic resin. A method of measuring the residual monomer content and its clinical application. Br Dent J 1976;140:347-50.
  12. Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Caglar A, Yasar A. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2003;34:148-53.
  13. Devlin H, Watts DC. Acrylic 'allergy'? Br Dent J 1984;157:272-5.
  14. Goncalves TS, Morganti MA, Campos LC, Rizzatto SM, Menezes LM. Allergy to auto-polymerized acrylic resin in an orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:431-5.
  15. Rahilly G, Price N. Current products and practice nickel allergy and orthodontics. J Orthod 2003;30:171-4.
  16. Noble J, Ahing SI, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. Nickel allergy and orthodontics