SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Odontologica Turcica / 2023 / Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3

Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files

T-endo must, T-endo mis ve Reciproc Blue Kanal Eğeleri ile Kanal Şekillendirmesi Sırasında Apikalden Taşan Debris Miktarının Karşılaştırılması

Funda FUNDAOĞLU KÜÇÜKEKENCİ
Pages
79–83
Publication Date
2023-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: The amount of apically extruded debris is related to the taper angle of the file used and the kinematics of the file.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nickel-titanium file systems with different taper angles working with rotation and reciprocation motion on the amount of debris extruding apically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After manual glide-path preparation, the teeth in each group were instrumented to the working length set 1 mm short of the anatomical apex using the standard sequence provided by the manufacturers: Group 1: Reciproc Blue (Easy In Smile, New Jersey, USA), Group 2: T-endo must (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey),Group 3: T-endo mis (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: The amount of apically extruded debris is related to the taper angle of the file used and the kinematics of the file.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:apikal foramen · endodonti · kök kanalını hazırlama

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nickel-titanium file systems with different taper angles working with rotation and reciprocation motion on the amount of debris extruding apically. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study was performed using the Myers and Montgomery model. Forty-five human maxillary anterior teeth were inserted into preweighed Eppendorf tubes and randomly classified into three groups. After manual glide-path preparation, the teeth in each group were instrumented to the working length set 1 mm short of the anatomical apex using the standard sequence provided by the manufacturers: Group 1: Reciproc Blue (Easy In Smile, New Jersey, USA), Group 2: T-endo must (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey),Group 3: T-endo mis (Dentac, İstanbul, Turkey). Root canals were irrigated with 10 mL 2.5% NaOCl, 17% EDTA, and distilled water between each file insertion. The tubes with collected debris were stored in an incubator at 70°C for 7 days. Measurement of the weight of extruded debris was performed by subtracting the pre-instrumentation from the post-instrumentation weight of the tubes. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference Test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The weights of the apically extruded debris were 0.0094±0.0015 g in Group 1, 0.0075±0.0012 g in Group 2, and 0.0044±0.0010 g in Group 3, and the difference between all groups was statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The amount of apically extruded debris is related to the taper angle of the file used and the kinematics of the file.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, rotasyon ve resiprokasyon hareketi ile çalışan farklı koniklik açılarına sahip nikel titanium eğe sistemlerinin apikalden taşan debris miktarına etkisini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma Myers ve Montgomery modeli kullanılarak yapıldı. Kırk beş insan üst kesici diş önceden tartılmış Eppendorf tüplerine yerleştirildi ve anatomik apeksten 1 mm kısa çalışma boyu olacak şekilde Grup 1: Reciproc Blue (Easy In Smile, New Jersey, ABD); Grup 2: T-endo must (Dentac, İstanbul, Türkiye), Grup 3: T-endo mis (Dentac, İstanbul, Türkiye) ile şekillendirildi. Kök kanalları 10 mL %2.5 NaOCl, %17 EDTA ve distile su ile irrige edildi. İçerisinde debris olan tüpler 7 gün boyunca 70 °C inkübatörde bekletildi. Tüplerin son ağırlığından ilk ağırlıkları çıkarılarak apikalden taşan debris miktarları elde edildi. Veriler, tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile değerlendirildi (α=0,05). Bulgular: Grup 1'de 0.0094±0.0015 g, Grup 2'de 0.007±0.0012 g ve Grup 3'te 0.0044±0.0010 g debris görüldü. Tüm gruplar arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0.05). Sonuç: Apikalden taşan debris miktarı, kullanılan eğenin koniklik açısı ve eğenin kinematiği ile ilgilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKEKENCİ, F. F. (2023). Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris During Root Canal Instrumentation Using T-endo must, T-endo mis, and Reciproc Blue Files. Acta Odontologica Turcica, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 3, 79–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/960036

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Chércoles-Ruiz A, Sanchez-Torres A, Gay-Escoda C. Endodontics, endodontic retreatment, and apical surgery versus tooth extraction and implant placement: A systematic review. J Endod 2017;43:679-86. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67.
  2. Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11:472–8. Siqueira JF. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J 2003;36:453–63.
  3. Ustun Y, Canakci BC, Dincer AN, Er O, Duzgun S. Evaluation of apically extruded debris associated with several Ni-Ti systems. Int Endod J 2015;48:701-4.
  4. Nayak G, Singh I, Shetty S, Dahiya S. Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using two new reciprocating and one continuous rotation single file systems. J Dent Tehran 2014;11:302-9.
  5. Uzun I, Guler B, Ozyurek T, Tunc T. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:71-5.
  6. Gündoğar M, ÖzyürekT. Cyclic fatigue resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1192–6.
  7. Boijink D, Costa DD, Hoppe CB, Kopper PMP, Grecca FS. Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using the WaveOne Gold Reciprocating and Twisted File Adaptive Systems. J Endod 2018;44:1289-92. T-endo Must Brochure [Internet]. [cited 2022 July 12]. Available from: https://dentac.com/img/D/must-eng.pdf
  8. De-Deus G, Silva EJ, Vieira VT, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G. et al. Blue Thermomechanical Treatment Optimizes Fatigue Resistance and Flexibility of the Reciproc Files. J Endod 2017;43:462-6. T-endo Mis Brochure[Internet].[cited 2022 July 12]. Available from: https://dentac.com/img/K/katalog.pdf
  9. Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17:275-9.
  10. Ruiz-Hubard EE, Gutmann JL, Wagner MJ. A quantitative assessment of canal debrisforced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques.J Endod 1987;13:554–8.
  11. Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1998;24:180-3.
  12. Beeson TJ, Hartwell GR, Thornton JD, Gunsolley JC. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile.04 Taper series 29. J Endod 1998;24:18-22.
  13. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically Extruded D