Journals / Clinical Dentistry and Research / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

POSTERİOR MANDİBULA ATROFİSİNİN TEDAVİSİ; İKİ FARKLI CERRAHİ TEKNİĞİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

DEALING with ATROPHY of MANDIBULA POSTERIOR; CLINICAL COMPARISON of TWO DIFFERENT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

Pages
62–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the unsupported thin bones can be problematic and undesirable bone resorptions can occur with one stage surgeries in bone expanding with piezosurgery

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The long term teeth loss results in progressive loss of alveolar bone height and width so that jaws becomes partially or totally atrophic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the alveolar ridges lack the appropriate bone volume, additional surgical procedures are needed to reconstruct and augment the deficiency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the unsupported thin bones can be problematic and undesirable bone resorptions can occur with one stage surgeries in bone expanding with piezosurgery
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The long term teeth loss results in progressive loss of alveolar bone height and width so that jaws becomes partially or totally atrophic. When the alveolar ridges lack the appropriate bone volume, additional surgical procedures are needed to reconstruct and augment the deficiency. The reconstruction of defective mandibles using nonvascularized bone grafts and dental implant insertion has become a well-established procedure for prosthodontic rehabilitation. Autogenous bone is believed to be the most effective bone graft material and is still regarded as the “gold standard”. Moreover, piezosurgery is relatively a new technique for osteotomy and osteoplasty. The microvibrations allow a selective cut of only mineralized structures without damaging soft tissues and allow very thin cuts.In the case reports, mandibular knife edge ridges’ augmentation with corticocansellous symphyseal autografts and bone expanding with piezoelectric surgery is presented. Autogenous mandibular bone grafts can provide a reliable bone quality for augmenting the ridge width of the posterior mandible prior to adequate implant restoration and improve the esthetics and function of the final restoration. However, the unsupported thin bones can be problematic and undesirable bone resorptions can occur with one stage surgeries in bone expanding with piezosurgery

Özet

Uzun süreli dişsizlik, zamanla artan şekilde alveoler kemiğin yüksekliğinde ve genişliğinde azalmaya neden olur ve bu da çenelerde total veya parsiyel atrofiye yol açar. Alveoler sırtlar uygun kemik hacmi açısından yetersiz olduğunda, defekti doldurmak ve yeniden yapılandırmak için ilave cerrahi işlemlere gereksinim durulur. Protetik rehabilitasyon için, defektif alanın non-vaskülarize kemik greftleri kullanılarak yeniden yapılandırılması ve dental implant yerleştirme en yerleşmiş yöntemlerdir. Otojen kemiğin, en etkili kemik grefti olduğuna inanılmaktadır ve günümüzde de “altın standart” olarak kabul görmektedir. Bunun ötesinde, piezocerrahi; osteotomi ve osteoplasti için nispeten daha yeni bir yöntemdir. Mikrovibrazyonlar yumuşak dokuları zedelemeden mineralize dokuların seçici olarak kesilmesini ve çok ince kesilerin yapılabilmelerini sağlamaktadır. Bu olgu bildiriminde, mandibuler knife edge sırtların kortikokanseloz simfizeyal otogreftlerle doldurulması ve piyezoelektrik cerrahi ile kemik genişletme sunulmuştur. Otojen mandibuler kemik greftleri, uygun implant restorasyonu öncesinde mandibulanın posteriorunda kemik sırtlarının genişliğinin artırılmasında güvenilir bir kemik kalitesi sağlayabilir ve final restorasyonun estetik ve fonksiyonel özelliklerini geliştirir. Bununla birlikte, desteklenmemiş ince kemikler problem yaratabilir ve piyezocerrahi ile tek aşamalı kemik genişletme işlemlerinde istenmeyen kemik rezorpsiyonları görülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUHTAROĞULLARI, M., ÜNGÖR, C., TURALI, S., İSMAYILOV, O. (2013). POSTERİOR MANDİBULA ATROFİSİNİN TEDAVİSİ; İKİ FARKLI CERRAHİ TEKNİĞİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Clinical Dentistry and Research, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 62–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/149676

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aghalo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2007; 22(suppl): 49-70
  2. Clayman L. Implant Reconstruction of the Bone-Grafted Maxilla: Review of the Literature and Presentation of 8 Cases, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2006; 64: 674-682
  3. Brånemark PI, Lindström J, Hallén O, Breine U, Jeppson PH, Ohman A. Reconstruction of the defective mandible. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 9: 116-128 4. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris GB, Sbordone C, Guidetti F. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and nativ bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized Tomographic follow-up. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2009; 24: 695-703
  4. Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction With Nonvascularized Autogenous Block Bone: Clinical Results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65: 2039-2046
  5. Stübinger S, Landes C, Seitz O, Zeilhofer HF, Sader R. Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 cases. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 66-71
  6. Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol 2004; 53: 207-214
  7. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17 (Suppl. 2) 136–159
  8. Elo JA, Herford AS, Boyne PJ. Implant success in distracted bone versus autogenous bone-grafted sites. Journal of Oral Implantology 2009; 35: 181-184. 10.McCarthy C, Patel RR, Wragg FP, Brook IM. Dental Implants and Onlay Bone Grafts in the Anterior Maxilla: Analysis of Clinical Outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 238–241
  9. Louis PJ, Gutta R, Said-Al-Naief N, Bartolucci AA. Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible With Particulate Bone Graft and Titanium Mesh for Implant Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66: 235-245. 12.Verdugo F, Simonian K, D’Addona A, Ponto´ n J,Nowzari H. Human Bone Repair After Mandibular Symphysis Block Harvesting: A Clinical and Tomographic Study. J Periodontol 2010;81: 702-709. 13.Williamson RA. Rehabilitation of the Resorbed Maxilla and Mandible Using Autogenous Bone Grafts and Osseointegrated Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 476-488. 14.Coatoam GW, Mariotti A. The segmental ridge-split procedure, J Periodontol 2003; 74; 5: 757-770
  10. Lopes N, Oliveira